中国住房公积金的投入产出效率:时空变化与影响因素

IF 1.8 3区 经济学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Journal of Housing and the Built Environment Pub Date : 2024-01-10 DOI:10.1007/s10901-023-10099-x
Hongyan Chen, Linchuan Yang, Huaxiong Jiang, Jinping Song
{"title":"中国住房公积金的投入产出效率:时空变化与影响因素","authors":"Hongyan Chen, Linchuan Yang, Huaxiong Jiang, Jinping Song","doi":"10.1007/s10901-023-10099-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The input–output efficiency of China’s Housing Provident Fund (HPF) program has received increasing academic attention in recent years. However, few studies have been conducted to examine its temporal-spatial variations and influencing factors. To fill the gaps, this study first used a DEA model to measure the input–output efficiency of HPF of 287 Chinese cities from 2015 to 2020, and then employed the Tobit regression model to determine the main influencing factors. Results indicate: (1) China's HPF input–output efficiency grew consistently from 2015 to 2020, remaining relatively high even during the Covid-19 outbreak. (2) HPF's efficiency displays notable spatial variation, with values higher in the eastern region and large cities compared to the western/central areas and medium/small cities. (3) Macroeconomic factors, housing market conditions, and HPF management elements significantly influence HPF efficiency, yet specific impacts vary; some factors (e.g., housing prices, capital investment intensity, fund utilization level) are positive, while others (housing price-to-income ratios, commercial housing loan interest rates, number of contributing employees) are negative. This study enhances understanding of HPF efficiency over time and space in China, offering insights for policy reform and system enhancement.</p>","PeriodicalId":47558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Housing and the Built Environment","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Input–output efficiency of the housing provident fund in China: temporal-spatial variations and influencing factors\",\"authors\":\"Hongyan Chen, Linchuan Yang, Huaxiong Jiang, Jinping Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10901-023-10099-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The input–output efficiency of China’s Housing Provident Fund (HPF) program has received increasing academic attention in recent years. However, few studies have been conducted to examine its temporal-spatial variations and influencing factors. To fill the gaps, this study first used a DEA model to measure the input–output efficiency of HPF of 287 Chinese cities from 2015 to 2020, and then employed the Tobit regression model to determine the main influencing factors. Results indicate: (1) China's HPF input–output efficiency grew consistently from 2015 to 2020, remaining relatively high even during the Covid-19 outbreak. (2) HPF's efficiency displays notable spatial variation, with values higher in the eastern region and large cities compared to the western/central areas and medium/small cities. (3) Macroeconomic factors, housing market conditions, and HPF management elements significantly influence HPF efficiency, yet specific impacts vary; some factors (e.g., housing prices, capital investment intensity, fund utilization level) are positive, while others (housing price-to-income ratios, commercial housing loan interest rates, number of contributing employees) are negative. This study enhances understanding of HPF efficiency over time and space in China, offering insights for policy reform and system enhancement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Housing and the Built Environment\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Housing and the Built Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-023-10099-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Housing and the Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-023-10099-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,中国住房公积金项目的投入产出效率越来越受到学术界的关注。然而,很少有研究对其时空变化和影响因素进行考察。为填补空白,本研究首先采用 DEA 模型测算了 2015-2020 年中国 287 个城市的住房公积金投入产出效率,然后采用 Tobit 回归模型确定了主要影响因素。结果表明:(1)2015 年至 2020 年,中国 HPF 投入产出效率持续增长,即使在 Covid-19 爆发期间也保持了较高水平。(2) HPF 的效率呈现明显的空间差异,东部地区和大城市的数值高于中西部地区和中小城市。(3) 宏观经济因素、住房市场条件和住房公积金管理要素对住房公积金效率有显著影响,但具体影响因素不尽相同;有些因素(如房价、资本投资强度、资金使用水平)是正向的,而有些因素(房价收入比、商业住房贷款利率、缴存职工人数)是负向的。本研究加深了对中国住房公积金效率的时空理解,为政策改革和制度完善提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Input–output efficiency of the housing provident fund in China: temporal-spatial variations and influencing factors

The input–output efficiency of China’s Housing Provident Fund (HPF) program has received increasing academic attention in recent years. However, few studies have been conducted to examine its temporal-spatial variations and influencing factors. To fill the gaps, this study first used a DEA model to measure the input–output efficiency of HPF of 287 Chinese cities from 2015 to 2020, and then employed the Tobit regression model to determine the main influencing factors. Results indicate: (1) China's HPF input–output efficiency grew consistently from 2015 to 2020, remaining relatively high even during the Covid-19 outbreak. (2) HPF's efficiency displays notable spatial variation, with values higher in the eastern region and large cities compared to the western/central areas and medium/small cities. (3) Macroeconomic factors, housing market conditions, and HPF management elements significantly influence HPF efficiency, yet specific impacts vary; some factors (e.g., housing prices, capital investment intensity, fund utilization level) are positive, while others (housing price-to-income ratios, commercial housing loan interest rates, number of contributing employees) are negative. This study enhances understanding of HPF efficiency over time and space in China, offering insights for policy reform and system enhancement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: The Journal of Housing and the Built Environment is a scholarly journal presenting the results of scientific research and new developments in policy and practice to a diverse readership of specialists, practitioners and policy-makers. This refereed journal covers the fields of housing, spatial planning, building and urban development. The journal guarantees high scientific quality by a double blind review procedure. Next to that, the editorial board discusses each article as well. Leading scholars in the field of housing, spatial planning and urban development publish regularly in Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. The journal publishes articles from scientists all over the world, both Western and non-Western, providing a truly international platform for developments in both theory and practice in the fields of housing, spatial planning, building and urban development. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment (HBE) has a wide scope and includes all topics dealing with people-environment relations. Topics concern social relations within the built environment as well as the physicals component of the built environment. As such the journal brings together social science and engineering. HBE is of interest for scientists like housing researchers, social geographers, (urban) planners and architects. Furthermore it presents a forum for practitioners to present their experiences in new developments on policy and practice. Because of its unique structure of research articles and policy and practice contributions, HBE provides a forum where science and practice can be confronted. Finally, each volume of HBE contains one special issue, in which recent developments on one particular topic are discussed in depth. The aim of Journal of Housing and the Built Environment is to give international exposure to recent research and policy and practice developments on the built environment and thereby open up a forum wherein re searchers can exchange ideas and develop contacts. In this way HBE seeks to enhance the quality of research in the field and disseminate the results to a wider audience. Its scope is intended to interest scientists as well as policy-makers, both in government and in organizations dealing with housing and urban issues.
期刊最新文献
Sharing housing: a solution to – or a reflection of – housing inequality? The mediating role of sense of place in relationship between localized social ties and residential satisfaction Rules of organized chaos: patterns in self-help incremental housing in Kampung Cikini, Jakarta Green spaces in Polish large prefabricated housing estates developed in the socialist era Housing cooperatives in Egypt: challenges, constraints, and solutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1