农民参与激励性保护计划:探索创新设计的障碍和机遇

IF 2.2 4区 农林科学 Q2 ECOLOGY Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2489/jswc.2024.00122
M. Houser, B. Campbell, A. Jacobs, S. Fanok, S.E. Johnson
{"title":"农民参与激励性保护计划:探索创新设计的障碍和机遇","authors":"M. Houser, B. Campbell, A. Jacobs, S. Fanok, S.E. Johnson","doi":"10.2489/jswc.2024.00122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Farmers must widely adopt conservation practices if the agricultural system is to become more sustainable. In the United States, federal, state, nonprofit, and private efforts focus on encouraging voluntary adoption through incentive programs. Toward increasing the adoption of conservation practices, it is critical to gain a better understanding of farmers’ past experiences with existing voluntary incentive programs and how they feel programs can be improved going froward to enable greater and more meaningful participation. To offer preliminary insight into these research needs, our study draws on interviews with 10 dairy farmers in the key agricultural county of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. In focusing on this regional context and farming segment, our work offers needed insight into this population’s views on conservation programs and decision-making more generally. Farmers in our sample noted several challenges with current programs that limited wider participation. Programs were seen to enable, rather than directly motivate behavior change. Farmers felt that existing programs at least implicitly overemphasized agriculture’s role in environmental problems and they noted that enrollment complexity, long timelines, and the requirement of upfront spending reduced participation. Toward improvement, interviewees felt private sector agricultural organizations can help facilitate program participation through direct engagement, that the communication of the environmental impact of farmers’ actions could be a participation incentive in itself, and that dairy producers could be better supported by programs that reward environmental achievements via paying more for their milk. These findings advance the existing social science literature on conservation program participation generally, while offering the detailed information about a specific farm type in a specific geography. Our results therefore afford insights that can contribute toward developing targeted engagement and implementation projects, while also offering foundational data toward future research and eventual policy innovation.","PeriodicalId":50049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Soil and Water Conservation","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Farmers’ participation in incentivized conservation programs: Exploring barriers and opportunities for innovative designs\",\"authors\":\"M. Houser, B. Campbell, A. Jacobs, S. Fanok, S.E. Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.2489/jswc.2024.00122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Farmers must widely adopt conservation practices if the agricultural system is to become more sustainable. In the United States, federal, state, nonprofit, and private efforts focus on encouraging voluntary adoption through incentive programs. Toward increasing the adoption of conservation practices, it is critical to gain a better understanding of farmers’ past experiences with existing voluntary incentive programs and how they feel programs can be improved going froward to enable greater and more meaningful participation. To offer preliminary insight into these research needs, our study draws on interviews with 10 dairy farmers in the key agricultural county of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. In focusing on this regional context and farming segment, our work offers needed insight into this population’s views on conservation programs and decision-making more generally. Farmers in our sample noted several challenges with current programs that limited wider participation. Programs were seen to enable, rather than directly motivate behavior change. Farmers felt that existing programs at least implicitly overemphasized agriculture’s role in environmental problems and they noted that enrollment complexity, long timelines, and the requirement of upfront spending reduced participation. Toward improvement, interviewees felt private sector agricultural organizations can help facilitate program participation through direct engagement, that the communication of the environmental impact of farmers’ actions could be a participation incentive in itself, and that dairy producers could be better supported by programs that reward environmental achievements via paying more for their milk. These findings advance the existing social science literature on conservation program participation generally, while offering the detailed information about a specific farm type in a specific geography. Our results therefore afford insights that can contribute toward developing targeted engagement and implementation projects, while also offering foundational data toward future research and eventual policy innovation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Soil and Water Conservation\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Soil and Water Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2024.00122\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Soil and Water Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2024.00122","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

要想使农业系统更具可持续性,农民必须广泛采用保护措施。在美国,联邦、州、非营利组织和私人机构都在努力通过激励项目鼓励农民自愿采用保护措施。为了提高保护措施的采用率,关键是要更好地了解农民过去在现有自愿性激励项目中的经验,以及他们认为如何改进项目才能使其得到更广泛和更有意义的参与。为了对这些研究需求提供初步见解,我们的研究对宾夕法尼亚州兰开斯特主要农业县的 10 位奶牛场主进行了访谈。通过对这一地区背景和农业部门的关注,我们的工作为深入了解这一人群对保护项目和决策的看法提供了必要的帮助。在我们的样本中,农民们指出了当前计划所面临的一些挑战,这些挑战限制了更广泛的参与。他们认为计划是为了促成行为改变,而不是直接推动行为改变。农民们认为,现有的计划至少隐含地过分强调了农业在环境问题中的作用,他们还指出,报名的复杂性、冗长的时间表以及对前期支出的要求降低了参与度。受访者认为,私营部门的农业组织可以通过直接参与来帮助促进项目的参与,宣传农民行为对环境的影响本身就可以成为一种参与激励,而通过为牛奶支付更多费用来奖励环保成就的项目可以更好地支持奶制品生产者。这些发现推动了现有社会科学文献对保护计划参与度的普遍研究,同时提供了特定地域特定农场类型的详细信息。因此,我们的研究结果提供了有助于制定有针对性的参与和实施项目的见解,同时也为未来的研究和最终的政策创新提供了基础数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Farmers’ participation in incentivized conservation programs: Exploring barriers and opportunities for innovative designs
Farmers must widely adopt conservation practices if the agricultural system is to become more sustainable. In the United States, federal, state, nonprofit, and private efforts focus on encouraging voluntary adoption through incentive programs. Toward increasing the adoption of conservation practices, it is critical to gain a better understanding of farmers’ past experiences with existing voluntary incentive programs and how they feel programs can be improved going froward to enable greater and more meaningful participation. To offer preliminary insight into these research needs, our study draws on interviews with 10 dairy farmers in the key agricultural county of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. In focusing on this regional context and farming segment, our work offers needed insight into this population’s views on conservation programs and decision-making more generally. Farmers in our sample noted several challenges with current programs that limited wider participation. Programs were seen to enable, rather than directly motivate behavior change. Farmers felt that existing programs at least implicitly overemphasized agriculture’s role in environmental problems and they noted that enrollment complexity, long timelines, and the requirement of upfront spending reduced participation. Toward improvement, interviewees felt private sector agricultural organizations can help facilitate program participation through direct engagement, that the communication of the environmental impact of farmers’ actions could be a participation incentive in itself, and that dairy producers could be better supported by programs that reward environmental achievements via paying more for their milk. These findings advance the existing social science literature on conservation program participation generally, while offering the detailed information about a specific farm type in a specific geography. Our results therefore afford insights that can contribute toward developing targeted engagement and implementation projects, while also offering foundational data toward future research and eventual policy innovation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (JSWC) is a multidisciplinary journal of natural resource conservation research, practice, policy, and perspectives. The journal has two sections: the A Section containing various departments and features, and the Research Section containing peer-reviewed research papers.
期刊最新文献
Defining boundaries and conceptual frameworks for ecologically focused agricultural systems Artificial intelligence for assessing organic matter content and related soil properties Decompaction and organic amendments provide short-term improvements in soil health during urban, residential development Effect of biochar treatment on soil pH and cucumber fruit: A demonstration of the importance of biochar amendment on the tropical soils of Nigeria Erratum for Martinez et al., Leveraging ecological monitoring programs to collect soil and geomorphology data across the western United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1