INGEVITY+主动固定导联的性能和医生体验:韩国前瞻性 INGEVITY+ 导联临床研究

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2024-01-11 DOI:10.1155/2024/2172306
Boyoung Joung, Myung Hwan Bae, Il-Young Oh, Hyung-Seob Park, Jaemin Shim, Min Soo Cho, Jung Myung Lee, Eue-Keun Choi, Young Soo Lee
{"title":"INGEVITY+主动固定导联的性能和医生体验:韩国前瞻性 INGEVITY+ 导联临床研究","authors":"Boyoung Joung, Myung Hwan Bae, Il-Young Oh, Hyung-Seob Park, Jaemin Shim, Min Soo Cho, Jung Myung Lee, Eue-Keun Choi, Young Soo Lee","doi":"10.1155/2024/2172306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<i>Background</i>. Boston Scientific INGEVITY+ pacing lead (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) has been upgraded to INGEVITY. The performance of the INGEVITY+ pacing lead has not yet been reported. This study aimed to evaluate the short- and long-term safety, effectiveness, and handling experience of INGEVITY+ leads. <i>Methods</i>. Consecutive patients were included from 9 institutions in Korea, where 400 leads (200 right ventricular active fixation leads and 200 right atrial active fixation leads) were implanted or attempted in 200 subjects. <i>Results</i>. During the implantation, only one patient required a lead change because of lead screw failure. The handling questionnaires of the lead received very positive feedback with 88% of operators agreeing that it is easy for leads to pass through small vessels or vessels with multiple leads. At the 3-month follow-up, 95.7% of RA leads and 99.5% of RV leads had pacing thresholds less than 1.5 V. A total of 92.4% of atrial leads had amplitudes greater than 1.5 mV, and 96.5% of ventricular leads had sensing amplitudes greater than 5 mV at 3 months. A total of 99.8% had impedances between 300 and 1,300 ohms. The lead-related complication-free rate for all leads during follow-up was 100%, and the overall rates of lead dislodgment, perforation, and pericardial effusion were all 0.0%. <i>Conclusions</i>. The INGEVITY+ pacing lead exhibited exceptional clinical performance, with a high complication-free rate throughout the 3-month follow-up period. In addition, the lead displayed excellent electrical characteristics, and the lead-handling experience was reported to be very good.","PeriodicalId":9494,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research and Practice","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance and Physician Experience of INGEVITY+ Active Fixation Leads: Prospective INGEVITY+ Lead Clinical Study in Korea\",\"authors\":\"Boyoung Joung, Myung Hwan Bae, Il-Young Oh, Hyung-Seob Park, Jaemin Shim, Min Soo Cho, Jung Myung Lee, Eue-Keun Choi, Young Soo Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/2172306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<i>Background</i>. Boston Scientific INGEVITY+ pacing lead (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) has been upgraded to INGEVITY. The performance of the INGEVITY+ pacing lead has not yet been reported. This study aimed to evaluate the short- and long-term safety, effectiveness, and handling experience of INGEVITY+ leads. <i>Methods</i>. Consecutive patients were included from 9 institutions in Korea, where 400 leads (200 right ventricular active fixation leads and 200 right atrial active fixation leads) were implanted or attempted in 200 subjects. <i>Results</i>. During the implantation, only one patient required a lead change because of lead screw failure. The handling questionnaires of the lead received very positive feedback with 88% of operators agreeing that it is easy for leads to pass through small vessels or vessels with multiple leads. At the 3-month follow-up, 95.7% of RA leads and 99.5% of RV leads had pacing thresholds less than 1.5 V. A total of 92.4% of atrial leads had amplitudes greater than 1.5 mV, and 96.5% of ventricular leads had sensing amplitudes greater than 5 mV at 3 months. A total of 99.8% had impedances between 300 and 1,300 ohms. The lead-related complication-free rate for all leads during follow-up was 100%, and the overall rates of lead dislodgment, perforation, and pericardial effusion were all 0.0%. <i>Conclusions</i>. The INGEVITY+ pacing lead exhibited exceptional clinical performance, with a high complication-free rate throughout the 3-month follow-up period. In addition, the lead displayed excellent electrical characteristics, and the lead-handling experience was reported to be very good.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/2172306\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/2172306","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。Boston Scientific INGEVITY+ 起搏导联(Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA)已升级为 INGEVITY。INGEVITY+起搏导联的性能尚未见报道。本研究旨在评估 INGEVITY+ 导联的短期和长期安全性、有效性和操作经验。方法。纳入韩国 9 家机构的连续患者,在 200 名受试者中植入或尝试植入了 400 个导联(200 个右心室主动固定导联和 200 个右心房主动固定导联)。结果显示在植入过程中,只有一名患者因导联螺钉失效而需要更换导联。导联操作问卷得到了非常积极的反馈,88%的操作者认为导联很容易穿过小血管或有多条导联的血管。在 3 个月的随访中,95.7% 的 RA 导联和 99.5% 的 RV 导联的起搏阈值低于 1.5 V。3 个月时,92.4% 的心房导联振幅大于 1.5 mV,96.5% 的心室导联感应振幅大于 5 mV。99.8%的导联阻抗在 300 到 1300 欧姆之间。随访期间,所有导联的无导联相关并发症发生率为 100%,导联脱落、穿孔和心包积液的总体发生率均为 0.0%。结论INGEVITY+ 起搏导联表现出卓越的临床性能,在 3 个月的随访期间无并发症发生率很高。此外,该起搏导联还具有出色的电气特性,而且据报告导联操作体验非常好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance and Physician Experience of INGEVITY+ Active Fixation Leads: Prospective INGEVITY+ Lead Clinical Study in Korea
Background. Boston Scientific INGEVITY+ pacing lead (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) has been upgraded to INGEVITY. The performance of the INGEVITY+ pacing lead has not yet been reported. This study aimed to evaluate the short- and long-term safety, effectiveness, and handling experience of INGEVITY+ leads. Methods. Consecutive patients were included from 9 institutions in Korea, where 400 leads (200 right ventricular active fixation leads and 200 right atrial active fixation leads) were implanted or attempted in 200 subjects. Results. During the implantation, only one patient required a lead change because of lead screw failure. The handling questionnaires of the lead received very positive feedback with 88% of operators agreeing that it is easy for leads to pass through small vessels or vessels with multiple leads. At the 3-month follow-up, 95.7% of RA leads and 99.5% of RV leads had pacing thresholds less than 1.5 V. A total of 92.4% of atrial leads had amplitudes greater than 1.5 mV, and 96.5% of ventricular leads had sensing amplitudes greater than 5 mV at 3 months. A total of 99.8% had impedances between 300 and 1,300 ohms. The lead-related complication-free rate for all leads during follow-up was 100%, and the overall rates of lead dislodgment, perforation, and pericardial effusion were all 0.0%. Conclusions. The INGEVITY+ pacing lead exhibited exceptional clinical performance, with a high complication-free rate throughout the 3-month follow-up period. In addition, the lead displayed excellent electrical characteristics, and the lead-handling experience was reported to be very good.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology Research and Practice
Cardiology Research and Practice Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiology Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies that focus on the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. The journal welcomes submissions related to systemic hypertension, arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, vascular disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy.
期刊最新文献
Tanshinone IIA Protects Ischemia/Reperfusion-Induced Cardiomyocyte Injury by Inhibiting the HAS2/FGF9 Axis. Assessing the Utility of the DAPT Score and PRECISE-DAPT Score in Determining the Appropriateness of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction/Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Prevalence of Atrial Fibrillation in Semiurban Nepal: Result From a Community-Based Cross-Sectional Screening. Comparative Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Analyses Reveal Molecular Signatures of Myocardial Infarction and Transverse Aortic Constriction in Aged Mouse Models. The Association Between Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index and Readmission Within Six Months in Elderly Heart Failure Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study: Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index for Heart Failure Readmission Within 6 Months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1