通过三腔心动图评估主动脉瓣狭窄:主动脉和左心室之间平衡稳态免前扑(bSSFP)血液信号的比值可预测严重程度。

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jocmr.2023.100005
Kavitha Vimalesvaran, Sameer Zaman, James P Howard, Nikoo Aziminia, Marilena Giannoudi, Henry Procter, Marta Varela, Fatmatulzehra Uslu, Ben Ariff, Nick Linton, Eylem Levelt, Anil A Bharath, Graham D Cole
{"title":"通过三腔心动图评估主动脉瓣狭窄:主动脉和左心室之间平衡稳态免前扑(bSSFP)血液信号的比值可预测严重程度。","authors":"Kavitha Vimalesvaran, Sameer Zaman, James P Howard, Nikoo Aziminia, Marilena Giannoudi, Henry Procter, Marta Varela, Fatmatulzehra Uslu, Ben Ariff, Nick Linton, Eylem Levelt, Anil A Bharath, Graham D Cole","doi":"10.1016/j.jocmr.2023.100005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is an important tool for evaluating the severity of aortic stenosis (AS), co-existing aortic disease, and concurrent myocardial abnormalities. Acquiring this additional information requires protocol adaptations and additional scanner time, but is not necessary for the majority of patients who do not have AS. We observed that the relative signal intensity of blood in the ascending aorta on a balanced steady state free precession (bSSFP) 3-chamber cine was often reduced in those with significant aortic stenosis. We investigated whether this effect could be quantified and used to predict AS severity in comparison to existing gold-standard measurements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multi-centre, multi-vendor retrospective analysis of patients with AS undergoing CMR and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Blood signal intensity was measured in a ∼1 cm<sup>2</sup> region of interest (ROI) in the aorta and left ventricle (LV) in the 3-chamber bSSFP cine. Because signal intensity varied across patients and scanner vendors, a ratio of the mean signal intensity in the aorta ROI to the LV ROI (Ao:LV) was used. This ratio was compared using Pearson correlations against TTE parameters of AS severity: aortic valve peak velocity, mean pressure gradient and the dimensionless index. The study also assessed whether field strength (1.5 T vs. 3 T) and patient characteristics (presence of bicuspid aortic valves (BAV), dilated aortic root and low flow states) altered this signal relationship.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>314 patients (median age 69 [IQR 57-77], 64% male) who had undergone both CMR and TTE were studied; 84 had severe AS, 78 had moderate AS, 66 had mild AS and 86 without AS were studied as a comparator group. The median time between CMR and TTE was 12 weeks (IQR 4-26). The Ao:LV ratio at 1.5 T strongly correlated with peak velocity (r = -0.796, p = 0.001), peak gradient (r = -0.772, p = 0.001) and dimensionless index (r = 0.743, p = 0.001). An Ao:LV ratio of < 0.86 was 84% sensitive and 82% specific for detecting AS of any severity and a ratio of 0.58 was 83% sensitive and 92% specific for severe AS. The ability of Ao:LV ratio to predict AS severity remained for patients with bicuspid aortic valves, dilated aortic root or low indexed stroke volume. The relationship between Ao:LV ratio and AS severity was weaker at 3 T.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Ao:LV ratio, derived from bSSFP 3-chamber cine images, shows a good correlation with existing measures of AS severity. It demonstrates utility at 1.5 T and offers an easily calculable metric that can be used at the time of scanning or automated to identify on an adaptive basis which patients benefit from dedicated imaging to assess which patients should have additional sequences to assess AS.</p>","PeriodicalId":15221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11211219/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aortic stenosis assessment from the 3-chamber cine: Ratio of balanced steady-state-free-precession (bSSFP) blood signal between the aorta and left ventricle predicts severity.\",\"authors\":\"Kavitha Vimalesvaran, Sameer Zaman, James P Howard, Nikoo Aziminia, Marilena Giannoudi, Henry Procter, Marta Varela, Fatmatulzehra Uslu, Ben Ariff, Nick Linton, Eylem Levelt, Anil A Bharath, Graham D Cole\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jocmr.2023.100005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is an important tool for evaluating the severity of aortic stenosis (AS), co-existing aortic disease, and concurrent myocardial abnormalities. Acquiring this additional information requires protocol adaptations and additional scanner time, but is not necessary for the majority of patients who do not have AS. We observed that the relative signal intensity of blood in the ascending aorta on a balanced steady state free precession (bSSFP) 3-chamber cine was often reduced in those with significant aortic stenosis. We investigated whether this effect could be quantified and used to predict AS severity in comparison to existing gold-standard measurements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multi-centre, multi-vendor retrospective analysis of patients with AS undergoing CMR and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Blood signal intensity was measured in a ∼1 cm<sup>2</sup> region of interest (ROI) in the aorta and left ventricle (LV) in the 3-chamber bSSFP cine. Because signal intensity varied across patients and scanner vendors, a ratio of the mean signal intensity in the aorta ROI to the LV ROI (Ao:LV) was used. This ratio was compared using Pearson correlations against TTE parameters of AS severity: aortic valve peak velocity, mean pressure gradient and the dimensionless index. The study also assessed whether field strength (1.5 T vs. 3 T) and patient characteristics (presence of bicuspid aortic valves (BAV), dilated aortic root and low flow states) altered this signal relationship.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>314 patients (median age 69 [IQR 57-77], 64% male) who had undergone both CMR and TTE were studied; 84 had severe AS, 78 had moderate AS, 66 had mild AS and 86 without AS were studied as a comparator group. The median time between CMR and TTE was 12 weeks (IQR 4-26). The Ao:LV ratio at 1.5 T strongly correlated with peak velocity (r = -0.796, p = 0.001), peak gradient (r = -0.772, p = 0.001) and dimensionless index (r = 0.743, p = 0.001). An Ao:LV ratio of < 0.86 was 84% sensitive and 82% specific for detecting AS of any severity and a ratio of 0.58 was 83% sensitive and 92% specific for severe AS. The ability of Ao:LV ratio to predict AS severity remained for patients with bicuspid aortic valves, dilated aortic root or low indexed stroke volume. The relationship between Ao:LV ratio and AS severity was weaker at 3 T.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Ao:LV ratio, derived from bSSFP 3-chamber cine images, shows a good correlation with existing measures of AS severity. It demonstrates utility at 1.5 T and offers an easily calculable metric that can be used at the time of scanning or automated to identify on an adaptive basis which patients benefit from dedicated imaging to assess which patients should have additional sequences to assess AS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11211219/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2023.100005\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2023.100005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心血管磁共振(CMR)成像是评估主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)严重程度、并存主动脉疾病和并发心肌异常的重要工具。获取这些额外信息需要调整方案和增加扫描时间,但对于大多数没有主动脉瓣狭窄的患者来说并非必要。我们观察到,升主动脉血液在平衡稳态自由前扑(bSSFP)三腔Cine上的相对信号强度在主动脉明显狭窄的患者中通常会降低。与现有的黄金标准测量方法相比,我们研究了这种影响是否可以量化并用于预测强直性脊柱炎的严重程度:方法:对接受 CMR 和经胸超声心动图 (TTE) 检查的 AS 患者进行多中心、多供应商回顾性分析。在三腔 bSSFP cine 中测量主动脉和左心室 (LV) 中约 1 平方厘米感兴趣区 (ROI) 的血液信号强度。由于不同患者和扫描仪供应商的信号强度不同,因此采用了主动脉 ROI 与左心室 ROI 的平均信号强度比值(Ao:LV)。利用皮尔逊相关性将这一比率与 AS 严重程度的 TTE 参数(主动脉瓣峰值速度、平均压力梯度和无量纲指数)进行比较。研究还评估了场强(1.5T 与 3T)和患者特征(是否存在双尖瓣、主动脉根部扩张和低血流状态)是否会改变这种信号关系:研究对象包括314名同时接受CMR和TTE检查的患者(中位年龄69岁[IQR 57-77],64%为男性);其中84名重度AS患者、78名中度AS患者、66名轻度AS患者和86名无AS患者作为对比组。CMR 和 TTE 的中位间隔时间为 12 周(IQR 4-26)。1.5T 下的 Ao:LV 比值与峰值速度(r = -0.796,p=0.001)、峰值梯度(r = -0.772,p=0.001)和无量纲指数(r = 0.743,p = 0.001)密切相关。Ao:LV 比值的结论:从 bSSFP 三腔 cine 图像中得出的 Ao:LV 比值与现有的 AS 严重程度测量指标有很好的相关性。它在 1.5T 下显示出实用性,并提供了一个易于计算的指标,可在扫描时使用或自动使用,以适应性地确定哪些患者可从专用成像中获益,从而评估哪些患者应使用额外序列来评估 AS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aortic stenosis assessment from the 3-chamber cine: Ratio of balanced steady-state-free-precession (bSSFP) blood signal between the aorta and left ventricle predicts severity.

Background: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is an important tool for evaluating the severity of aortic stenosis (AS), co-existing aortic disease, and concurrent myocardial abnormalities. Acquiring this additional information requires protocol adaptations and additional scanner time, but is not necessary for the majority of patients who do not have AS. We observed that the relative signal intensity of blood in the ascending aorta on a balanced steady state free precession (bSSFP) 3-chamber cine was often reduced in those with significant aortic stenosis. We investigated whether this effect could be quantified and used to predict AS severity in comparison to existing gold-standard measurements.

Methods: Multi-centre, multi-vendor retrospective analysis of patients with AS undergoing CMR and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Blood signal intensity was measured in a ∼1 cm2 region of interest (ROI) in the aorta and left ventricle (LV) in the 3-chamber bSSFP cine. Because signal intensity varied across patients and scanner vendors, a ratio of the mean signal intensity in the aorta ROI to the LV ROI (Ao:LV) was used. This ratio was compared using Pearson correlations against TTE parameters of AS severity: aortic valve peak velocity, mean pressure gradient and the dimensionless index. The study also assessed whether field strength (1.5 T vs. 3 T) and patient characteristics (presence of bicuspid aortic valves (BAV), dilated aortic root and low flow states) altered this signal relationship.

Results: 314 patients (median age 69 [IQR 57-77], 64% male) who had undergone both CMR and TTE were studied; 84 had severe AS, 78 had moderate AS, 66 had mild AS and 86 without AS were studied as a comparator group. The median time between CMR and TTE was 12 weeks (IQR 4-26). The Ao:LV ratio at 1.5 T strongly correlated with peak velocity (r = -0.796, p = 0.001), peak gradient (r = -0.772, p = 0.001) and dimensionless index (r = 0.743, p = 0.001). An Ao:LV ratio of < 0.86 was 84% sensitive and 82% specific for detecting AS of any severity and a ratio of 0.58 was 83% sensitive and 92% specific for severe AS. The ability of Ao:LV ratio to predict AS severity remained for patients with bicuspid aortic valves, dilated aortic root or low indexed stroke volume. The relationship between Ao:LV ratio and AS severity was weaker at 3 T.

Conclusions: The Ao:LV ratio, derived from bSSFP 3-chamber cine images, shows a good correlation with existing measures of AS severity. It demonstrates utility at 1.5 T and offers an easily calculable metric that can be used at the time of scanning or automated to identify on an adaptive basis which patients benefit from dedicated imaging to assess which patients should have additional sequences to assess AS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) publishes high-quality articles on all aspects of basic, translational and clinical research on the design, development, manufacture, and evaluation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) methods applied to the cardiovascular system. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: New applications of magnetic resonance to improve the diagnostic strategies, risk stratification, characterization and management of diseases affecting the cardiovascular system. New methods to enhance or accelerate image acquisition and data analysis. Results of multicenter, or larger single-center studies that provide insight into the utility of CMR. Basic biological perceptions derived by CMR methods.
期刊最新文献
Design and Rationale of MYOFLAME-19 RCT: MYOcardial protection to reduce inFLAMmatory heart disease due to COVID-19 Infection using CMR Endpoints. Association Between Subclinical Right Ventricular Alterations and Aerobic Exercise Capacity in Type 2 Diabetes. Biventricular longitudinal strain analysis using CMR feature-tracking: prognostic value in Eisenmenger syndrome. Interstitial Fibrosis and Arrhythmic Mitral Valve Prolapse: Unravelling Sex-Based Differences. Safety of dobutamine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1