医用大麻治疗抑郁症的效果:一项自然门诊病人研究。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacopsychiatry Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-11 DOI:10.1055/a-2215-6114
Michael Specka, Udo Bonnet, Lisa Schmidberg, Julian Wichmann, Martin Keller, Christian Scholze, Norbert Scherbaum
{"title":"医用大麻治疗抑郁症的效果:一项自然门诊病人研究。","authors":"Michael Specka, Udo Bonnet, Lisa Schmidberg, Julian Wichmann, Martin Keller, Christian Scholze, Norbert Scherbaum","doi":"10.1055/a-2215-6114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a lack of studies on the course and effectiveness of medical cannabis in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective longitudinal (18 weeks) study of n=59 outpatients with MDD, treated with medical cannabis via a telemedical platform. Previous treatment with antidepressant medication was required for inclusion into the study. Standardized data collection was carried out at entry and during monthly consultations. Severity of depression was measured on a 0-10 point rating scale. Side-effects were assessed by a checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were 20-54 years old; 72.9% were male; one third reported times of regular cannabis consumption within the previous five years. Drop-out rate was 22% after 18 weeks. Mean severity of depression decreased from 6.9 points (SD 1.5) at entry to 3.8 points (2.7) at week 18 (baseline observation carried forward; 95% CI for the mean difference: 2.4 to 3.8; p<0.001). A treatment response (>50% reduction of the initial score) was seen in 50.8% at week 18. One third of patients complained about side effects, none was considered as severe. Concomitant antidepressant medication (31% of patients) was not associated with outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medical cannabis was well tolerated and dropout rate was comparable to those in clinical trials of antidepressant medication. Patients reported a clinically significant reduction of depression severity. Further research on the effectiveness of medical cannabis for MDD seems warranted. Risks of this medication, such as sustaining or inducing a cannabis use disorder, or side effects such as poor concentration, must be taken into consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":19783,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacopsychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Medical Cannabis for the Treatment of Depression: A Naturalistic Outpatient Study.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Specka, Udo Bonnet, Lisa Schmidberg, Julian Wichmann, Martin Keller, Christian Scholze, Norbert Scherbaum\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2215-6114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a lack of studies on the course and effectiveness of medical cannabis in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective longitudinal (18 weeks) study of n=59 outpatients with MDD, treated with medical cannabis via a telemedical platform. Previous treatment with antidepressant medication was required for inclusion into the study. Standardized data collection was carried out at entry and during monthly consultations. Severity of depression was measured on a 0-10 point rating scale. Side-effects were assessed by a checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were 20-54 years old; 72.9% were male; one third reported times of regular cannabis consumption within the previous five years. Drop-out rate was 22% after 18 weeks. Mean severity of depression decreased from 6.9 points (SD 1.5) at entry to 3.8 points (2.7) at week 18 (baseline observation carried forward; 95% CI for the mean difference: 2.4 to 3.8; p<0.001). A treatment response (>50% reduction of the initial score) was seen in 50.8% at week 18. One third of patients complained about side effects, none was considered as severe. Concomitant antidepressant medication (31% of patients) was not associated with outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medical cannabis was well tolerated and dropout rate was comparable to those in clinical trials of antidepressant medication. Patients reported a clinically significant reduction of depression severity. Further research on the effectiveness of medical cannabis for MDD seems warranted. Risks of this medication, such as sustaining or inducing a cannabis use disorder, or side effects such as poor concentration, must be taken into consideration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacopsychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacopsychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2215-6114\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacopsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2215-6114","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于医用大麻治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)的疗程和疗效的研究尚属空白:回顾性纵向研究(18 周):59 名重度抑郁症门诊患者通过远程医疗平台接受医用大麻治疗。曾接受过抗抑郁药物治疗的患者方可纳入研究。标准化数据收集工作在患者入院时和每月咨询时进行。抑郁症的严重程度按照 0-10 分的评分标准进行测量。副作用通过核对表进行评估:患者年龄在 20-54 岁之间;72.9% 为男性;三分之一的患者表示在过去五年内经常吸食大麻。18 周后的辍学率为 22%。抑郁症的平均严重程度从入院时的 6.9 分(标清 1.5 分)下降到第 18 周时的 3.8 分(2.7 分)(基线观察结果向前推移;平均差异的 95% CI:2.4 至 3.8;p50% 为初始评分的下降幅度),第 18 周时有 50.8%的患者出现抑郁症。三分之一的患者抱怨有副作用,但没有人认为副作用严重。同时服用抗抑郁药物(31% 的患者)与疗效无关:医用大麻的耐受性良好,辍药率与抗抑郁药物临床试验中的辍药率相当。据患者报告,抑郁症的严重程度在临床上明显减轻。似乎有必要进一步研究医用大麻对 MDD 的疗效。必须考虑到这种药物的风险,如持续或诱发大麻使用障碍,或注意力不集中等副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of Medical Cannabis for the Treatment of Depression: A Naturalistic Outpatient Study.

Background: There is a lack of studies on the course and effectiveness of medical cannabis in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD).

Methods: Retrospective longitudinal (18 weeks) study of n=59 outpatients with MDD, treated with medical cannabis via a telemedical platform. Previous treatment with antidepressant medication was required for inclusion into the study. Standardized data collection was carried out at entry and during monthly consultations. Severity of depression was measured on a 0-10 point rating scale. Side-effects were assessed by a checklist.

Results: Patients were 20-54 years old; 72.9% were male; one third reported times of regular cannabis consumption within the previous five years. Drop-out rate was 22% after 18 weeks. Mean severity of depression decreased from 6.9 points (SD 1.5) at entry to 3.8 points (2.7) at week 18 (baseline observation carried forward; 95% CI for the mean difference: 2.4 to 3.8; p<0.001). A treatment response (>50% reduction of the initial score) was seen in 50.8% at week 18. One third of patients complained about side effects, none was considered as severe. Concomitant antidepressant medication (31% of patients) was not associated with outcome.

Conclusions: Medical cannabis was well tolerated and dropout rate was comparable to those in clinical trials of antidepressant medication. Patients reported a clinically significant reduction of depression severity. Further research on the effectiveness of medical cannabis for MDD seems warranted. Risks of this medication, such as sustaining or inducing a cannabis use disorder, or side effects such as poor concentration, must be taken into consideration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacopsychiatry
Pharmacopsychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
9.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Covering advances in the fi eld of psychotropic drugs, Pharmaco psychiatry provides psychiatrists, neuroscientists and clinicians with key clinical insights and describes new avenues of research and treatment. The pharmacological and neurobiological bases of psychiatric disorders are discussed by presenting clinical and experimental research.
期刊最新文献
News on the Role of Antidepressants in and for COVID-19 and Long COVID. Monitoring Anesthetic Depth Using the Patient State Index in Electroconvulsive Therapy Improves Seizure Quality. Correction: Electroconvulsive Therapy Versus Aripiprazole Addition to Clozapine in Patients with Clozapine-Resistant Symptoms (EMECLO): A Protocol of a Single-Blind, Multicenter, Randomized-Controlled Feasibility Trial. Advancements in Non-Dopaminergic Treatments for Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review of Pipeline Developments. Discontinuation Rate of Lurasidone and Quetiapine Extended Release in Bipolar Depression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1