Joshua E Johnson, Ana V Figueroa, Marc J Brouillette, Benjamin J Miller, Jessica E Goetz
{"title":"对患有转移性疾病的股骨进行虚拟预防性髓内钉固定的相关机械收益","authors":"Joshua E Johnson, Ana V Figueroa, Marc J Brouillette, Benjamin J Miller, Jessica E Goetz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many patients with metastatic bone disease (MBD) of the femur undergo prophylactic surgical fixation for impending pathologic fractures; intramedullary nailing (IMN) being the most common fixation type. However, surgeons often question if IMN fixation provides sufficient improvements in mechanical strength for particular metastatic lesions. Our goal was to use patient-specific finite element (FE) modeling to computationally evaluate the effects of simulated IMN fixation on the mechanics of femurs affected with MBD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Computed tomography (CT) scans were available retrospectively from 48 patients (54 femurs) with proximal femoral metastases. The CT scans were used to create patient-specific, non-linear, voxel-based FE models of the femur, simulating the instant of peak hip joint contact force during normal walking. FE analyses were repeated after incorporating virtual IMN fixation (Smith and Nephew, TRIGEN INTERTAN) into the same femurs. Femur strength and load-to-strength ratio (LSR; lower LSR indicates lower fracture risk) were compared between untreated and IMN conditions using statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IMN fixation resulted in a very modest average 10% increase in mechanical strength (p<0.001), which was associated with a slight 7% reduction in fracture risk (p<0.001). However, there was considerable variation in fracture risk reduction between individual femurs (0.13-50%). In femurs with the largest reduction in fracture risk (>10%), IMN hardware directly passed through a considerable section of that femur's metastatic lesion. Femurs with lytic (10%) and diffuse (9%) metastases tended to have greater reductions in fracture risk compared to femurs with blastic (5%) and mixed (4%) metastases (p=0.073).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the mechanically strong baseline condition of most femurs in this cohort, evident by the low fracture risk at the time of CT scanning, the relative increase in stiffness with the addition of the IMN hardware may not make a substantial contribution to overall mechanical strength. The mechanical gains of IMN fixation in femurs with MBD appear most beneficial when the hardware traverses an adequate section of the lesion. <b>Level of Evidence: III</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":94233,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","volume":"43 2","pages":"70-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10777699/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanical Gains Associated With Virtual Prophylactic Intramedullary Nail Fixation in Femurs With Metastatic Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Joshua E Johnson, Ana V Figueroa, Marc J Brouillette, Benjamin J Miller, Jessica E Goetz\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many patients with metastatic bone disease (MBD) of the femur undergo prophylactic surgical fixation for impending pathologic fractures; intramedullary nailing (IMN) being the most common fixation type. However, surgeons often question if IMN fixation provides sufficient improvements in mechanical strength for particular metastatic lesions. Our goal was to use patient-specific finite element (FE) modeling to computationally evaluate the effects of simulated IMN fixation on the mechanics of femurs affected with MBD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Computed tomography (CT) scans were available retrospectively from 48 patients (54 femurs) with proximal femoral metastases. The CT scans were used to create patient-specific, non-linear, voxel-based FE models of the femur, simulating the instant of peak hip joint contact force during normal walking. FE analyses were repeated after incorporating virtual IMN fixation (Smith and Nephew, TRIGEN INTERTAN) into the same femurs. Femur strength and load-to-strength ratio (LSR; lower LSR indicates lower fracture risk) were compared between untreated and IMN conditions using statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IMN fixation resulted in a very modest average 10% increase in mechanical strength (p<0.001), which was associated with a slight 7% reduction in fracture risk (p<0.001). However, there was considerable variation in fracture risk reduction between individual femurs (0.13-50%). In femurs with the largest reduction in fracture risk (>10%), IMN hardware directly passed through a considerable section of that femur's metastatic lesion. Femurs with lytic (10%) and diffuse (9%) metastases tended to have greater reductions in fracture risk compared to femurs with blastic (5%) and mixed (4%) metastases (p=0.073).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the mechanically strong baseline condition of most femurs in this cohort, evident by the low fracture risk at the time of CT scanning, the relative increase in stiffness with the addition of the IMN hardware may not make a substantial contribution to overall mechanical strength. The mechanical gains of IMN fixation in femurs with MBD appear most beneficial when the hardware traverses an adequate section of the lesion. <b>Level of Evidence: III</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Iowa orthopaedic journal\",\"volume\":\"43 2\",\"pages\":\"70-78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10777699/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Iowa orthopaedic journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:许多股骨转移性骨病(MBD)患者都会接受预防性手术固定,以预防即将发生的病理性骨折;髓内钉(IMN)是最常见的固定方式。然而,外科医生经常质疑 IMN 固定是否能充分改善特定转移性病变的机械强度。我们的目标是使用患者特异性有限元(FE)建模来计算评估模拟 IMN 固定对 MBD 股骨力学的影响:回顾性获得了 48 位股骨近端转移患者(54 个股骨)的计算机断层扫描(CT)结果。CT 扫描结果被用于创建患者特定的、非线性的、基于体素的股骨 FE 模型,模拟正常行走时髋关节接触力峰值的瞬间。将虚拟 IMN 固定装置(Smith and Nephew,TRIGEN INTERTAN)植入相同的股骨后,重复进行 FE 分析。通过统计分析比较了未处理和 IMN 条件下的股骨强度和负载强度比(LSR;LSR 越低表明骨折风险越低):结果:IMN固定使机械强度平均提高了10%(p10%),而IMN硬件直接穿过了股骨转移病灶的很大一部分。与疱性(5%)和混合性(4%)转移的股骨相比,有溶解性(10%)和弥漫性(9%)转移的股骨往往能更大程度地降低骨折风险(P=0.073):考虑到该队列中大多数股骨的机械强度基线条件(CT扫描时骨折风险较低),添加 IMN 硬件后硬度的相对增加可能不会对整体机械强度产生实质性影响。当硬件穿过病变的足够部分时,IMN 固定对患有 MBD 的股骨的机械增益似乎最为有利。证据等级:III 级。
Mechanical Gains Associated With Virtual Prophylactic Intramedullary Nail Fixation in Femurs With Metastatic Disease.
Background: Many patients with metastatic bone disease (MBD) of the femur undergo prophylactic surgical fixation for impending pathologic fractures; intramedullary nailing (IMN) being the most common fixation type. However, surgeons often question if IMN fixation provides sufficient improvements in mechanical strength for particular metastatic lesions. Our goal was to use patient-specific finite element (FE) modeling to computationally evaluate the effects of simulated IMN fixation on the mechanics of femurs affected with MBD.
Methods: Computed tomography (CT) scans were available retrospectively from 48 patients (54 femurs) with proximal femoral metastases. The CT scans were used to create patient-specific, non-linear, voxel-based FE models of the femur, simulating the instant of peak hip joint contact force during normal walking. FE analyses were repeated after incorporating virtual IMN fixation (Smith and Nephew, TRIGEN INTERTAN) into the same femurs. Femur strength and load-to-strength ratio (LSR; lower LSR indicates lower fracture risk) were compared between untreated and IMN conditions using statistical analyses.
Results: IMN fixation resulted in a very modest average 10% increase in mechanical strength (p<0.001), which was associated with a slight 7% reduction in fracture risk (p<0.001). However, there was considerable variation in fracture risk reduction between individual femurs (0.13-50%). In femurs with the largest reduction in fracture risk (>10%), IMN hardware directly passed through a considerable section of that femur's metastatic lesion. Femurs with lytic (10%) and diffuse (9%) metastases tended to have greater reductions in fracture risk compared to femurs with blastic (5%) and mixed (4%) metastases (p=0.073).
Conclusion: Given the mechanically strong baseline condition of most femurs in this cohort, evident by the low fracture risk at the time of CT scanning, the relative increase in stiffness with the addition of the IMN hardware may not make a substantial contribution to overall mechanical strength. The mechanical gains of IMN fixation in femurs with MBD appear most beneficial when the hardware traverses an adequate section of the lesion. Level of Evidence: III.