手术能否提高淋巴结转移的 T1b1-T2a1 期宫颈癌化疗的生存率?一项基于人群的研究。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Gynecologic Oncology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-29 DOI:10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e36
Yiwei Wang, You Lyu, Xiaoxia Che, Jing Li, Weiwei Feng
{"title":"手术能否提高淋巴结转移的 T1b1-T2a1 期宫颈癌化疗的生存率?一项基于人群的研究。","authors":"Yiwei Wang, You Lyu, Xiaoxia Che, Jing Li, Weiwei Feng","doi":"10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine whether surgery followed by adjuvant chemoradiotherapy has superior survival outcomes for node-positive patients with T1b1-T2a1 stage cervical cancer compared with those who undergo chemoradiation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for 12,701 patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2018. Patients were stratified according to different T stages and different treatment strategies. Surgery included radical hysterectomy (RH) or total hysterectomy (TH). Radiotherapy (RT) included adjuvant chemoradiation or chemoradiation alone. Cox analyses were performed to select the clinically important factors of survival outcomes. Survival analysis was used to compare those who received different treatment methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12,701 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer patients were identified. The risk of overall survival (OS) was significantly different between patients who received and did not receive chemoradiotherapy in the T categories. In the propensity-score matched dataset, early-T stage (T1b1 and T1b2) and node-positive patients in the \"RH+RT\" and \"TH+RT\" groups had better disease-specific survival (DSS) than those in the RT group. No difference in DSS was observed between the \"surgery following RT\" group and the RT group in locally advanced stage (T1b3 and T2a1, node positive) patients. Regarding T1b1-T2a1 node-positive patients, the RH+RT group had a similar survival outcome to that in the TH+RT group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We showed that surgery following RT benefits early-T stage (T1b1 and T1b2) cervical cancer patients with lymph node metastasis. For locally advanced stages (T1b3 and T2a1), surgery and RT had similar survival outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11107273/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can surgery boost the survival benefit of chemoradiotherapy in T1b1-T2a1 stage cervical cancer with lymph node metastasis? A population-based study.\",\"authors\":\"Yiwei Wang, You Lyu, Xiaoxia Che, Jing Li, Weiwei Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e36\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine whether surgery followed by adjuvant chemoradiotherapy has superior survival outcomes for node-positive patients with T1b1-T2a1 stage cervical cancer compared with those who undergo chemoradiation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for 12,701 patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2018. Patients were stratified according to different T stages and different treatment strategies. Surgery included radical hysterectomy (RH) or total hysterectomy (TH). Radiotherapy (RT) included adjuvant chemoradiation or chemoradiation alone. Cox analyses were performed to select the clinically important factors of survival outcomes. Survival analysis was used to compare those who received different treatment methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12,701 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer patients were identified. The risk of overall survival (OS) was significantly different between patients who received and did not receive chemoradiotherapy in the T categories. In the propensity-score matched dataset, early-T stage (T1b1 and T1b2) and node-positive patients in the \\\"RH+RT\\\" and \\\"TH+RT\\\" groups had better disease-specific survival (DSS) than those in the RT group. No difference in DSS was observed between the \\\"surgery following RT\\\" group and the RT group in locally advanced stage (T1b3 and T2a1, node positive) patients. Regarding T1b1-T2a1 node-positive patients, the RH+RT group had a similar survival outcome to that in the TH+RT group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We showed that surgery following RT benefits early-T stage (T1b1 and T1b2) cervical cancer patients with lymph node metastasis. For locally advanced stages (T1b3 and T2a1), surgery and RT had similar survival outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11107273/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e36\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e36","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在确定,与接受化疗的T1b1-T2a1期宫颈癌结节阳性患者相比,手术后辅助化疗放疗是否具有更好的生存效果:我们调查了监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库中2000年至2018年期间确诊的12701名患者。根据不同的T分期和不同的治疗策略对患者进行了分层。手术包括根治性子宫切除术(RH)或全子宫切除术(TH)。放疗(RT)包括辅助化疗或单纯化疗。Cox分析用于选择影响生存结果的重要临床因素。生存分析用于比较接受不同治疗方法的患者:共确定了12701名国际妇产科联盟2018年IIIC期宫颈癌患者。在T类患者中,接受和未接受化放疗的患者总生存期(OS)风险存在显著差异。在倾向得分匹配数据集中,"RH+RT "组和 "TH+RT "组的早期T期(T1b1和T1b2)和结节阳性患者的疾病特异性生存率(DSS)优于RT组。在局部晚期(T1b3 和 T2a1,结节阳性)患者中,"RT 后手术 "组和 RT 组的 DSS 没有差异。对于T1b1-T2a1结节阳性患者,RH+RT组与TH+RT组的生存结果相似:结论:我们的研究表明,RT术后手术对早期T期(T1b1和T1b2)淋巴结转移的宫颈癌患者有益。对于局部晚期(T1b3 和 T2a1)宫颈癌患者,手术和 RT 的生存率相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can surgery boost the survival benefit of chemoradiotherapy in T1b1-T2a1 stage cervical cancer with lymph node metastasis? A population-based study.

Objective: This study aimed to determine whether surgery followed by adjuvant chemoradiotherapy has superior survival outcomes for node-positive patients with T1b1-T2a1 stage cervical cancer compared with those who undergo chemoradiation.

Methods: We investigated the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for 12,701 patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2018. Patients were stratified according to different T stages and different treatment strategies. Surgery included radical hysterectomy (RH) or total hysterectomy (TH). Radiotherapy (RT) included adjuvant chemoradiation or chemoradiation alone. Cox analyses were performed to select the clinically important factors of survival outcomes. Survival analysis was used to compare those who received different treatment methods.

Results: A total of 12,701 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer patients were identified. The risk of overall survival (OS) was significantly different between patients who received and did not receive chemoradiotherapy in the T categories. In the propensity-score matched dataset, early-T stage (T1b1 and T1b2) and node-positive patients in the "RH+RT" and "TH+RT" groups had better disease-specific survival (DSS) than those in the RT group. No difference in DSS was observed between the "surgery following RT" group and the RT group in locally advanced stage (T1b3 and T2a1, node positive) patients. Regarding T1b1-T2a1 node-positive patients, the RH+RT group had a similar survival outcome to that in the TH+RT group.

Conclusion: We showed that surgery following RT benefits early-T stage (T1b1 and T1b2) cervical cancer patients with lymph node metastasis. For locally advanced stages (T1b3 and T2a1), surgery and RT had similar survival outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology ONCOLOGY-OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
84
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gynecologic Oncology (JGO) is an official publication of the Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Abbreviated title is ''J Gynecol Oncol''. It was launched in 1990. The JGO''s aim is to publish the highest quality manuscripts dedicated to the advancement of care of the patients with gynecologic cancer. It is an international peer-reviewed periodical journal that is published bimonthly (January, March, May, July, September, and November). Supplement numbers are at times published. The journal publishes editorials, original and review articles, correspondence, book review, etc.
期刊最新文献
Step-by-step demonstration of "sciatic-nerve-preserved beyond-LEER" in a Thiel-embalmed cadaver: a novel salvage surgery for recurrent gynecologic malignancies. Niraparib in Japanese patients with heavily pretreated, homologous recombination-deficient ovarian cancer: final results of a multicenter phase 2 study. Anticancer effect of the antipsychotic agent penfluridol on epithelial ovarian cancer. Attitudes toward subsequent primary cancer prevention among survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adult (CAYA) cancer in Japan: results of a comprehensive questionnaire survey on long-term women's health after CAYA cancer. Evaluating the specific STAT3 inhibitor YHO-1701 in ovarian cancer cell lines and patient-derived cell models: efficacy, mechanisms, and therapeutic potential.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1