牙科学生年龄歧视量表(ASDS):焦点小组对内容有效性的审查。

IF 0.9 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Special Care in Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-12 DOI:10.1111/scd.12960
Kendall Elliott, Kimberly C Dukes, Patrick B Barlow, Anastassia Kossioni, Leonardo Marchini
{"title":"牙科学生年龄歧视量表(ASDS):焦点小组对内容有效性的审查。","authors":"Kendall Elliott, Kimberly C Dukes, Patrick B Barlow, Anastassia Kossioni, Leonardo Marchini","doi":"10.1111/scd.12960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/aim: </strong>Improve content validity of the Ageism Scale for Dental Students (ASDS) and identify barriers to using the scale.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thematic analysis of transcripts of three purposively sampled focus groups of 1) geriatric dentistry specialists, 2) older adult dental patients, and 3) dental students.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five participants engaged in focus groups. No new concepts to define ageism were identified. Experts found the scale acceptable and appropriate, yet they raised specific potential revisions to scale questions. Commonly reported themes already addressed by ASDS included the importance of tailoring decision-making to patient preference and not making assumptions about older adults' capacity or preferences for dental care. Barriers to identifying ageism or using the scale included experiential differences in interpreting scale items, cultural differences in attitudes towards older adults, and potential overlap with social determinants of health. Secondary findings include recommendations for older-adult focused training for dental students to provide positive, concrete guidance on caring for older adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are opportunities to refine the Ageism Scale for Dental Students and to allow tailoring of the scale for specific national or cultural contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":47470,"journal":{"name":"Special Care in Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ageism scale for dental students (ASDS): A focus group review of content validity.\",\"authors\":\"Kendall Elliott, Kimberly C Dukes, Patrick B Barlow, Anastassia Kossioni, Leonardo Marchini\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/scd.12960\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose/aim: </strong>Improve content validity of the Ageism Scale for Dental Students (ASDS) and identify barriers to using the scale.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thematic analysis of transcripts of three purposively sampled focus groups of 1) geriatric dentistry specialists, 2) older adult dental patients, and 3) dental students.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five participants engaged in focus groups. No new concepts to define ageism were identified. Experts found the scale acceptable and appropriate, yet they raised specific potential revisions to scale questions. Commonly reported themes already addressed by ASDS included the importance of tailoring decision-making to patient preference and not making assumptions about older adults' capacity or preferences for dental care. Barriers to identifying ageism or using the scale included experiential differences in interpreting scale items, cultural differences in attitudes towards older adults, and potential overlap with social determinants of health. Secondary findings include recommendations for older-adult focused training for dental students to provide positive, concrete guidance on caring for older adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are opportunities to refine the Ageism Scale for Dental Students and to allow tailoring of the scale for specific national or cultural contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Special Care in Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Special Care in Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/scd.12960\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Special Care in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/scd.12960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的/宗旨:提高牙科学生年龄歧视量表(ASDS)的内容有效性,并确定使用该量表的障碍:方法:对三个有目的抽样的焦点小组的记录进行主题分析,焦点小组成员包括:1)老年牙科专家;2)老年牙科患者;3)牙科学生:结果:25 名参与者参加了焦点小组。没有发现定义年龄歧视的新概念。专家们认为量表是可以接受的,也是合适的,但他们也对量表的问题提出了具体的修改意见。常见的主题包括:根据患者的偏好进行决策的重要性,以及不要对老年人的牙科保健能力或偏好做出假设。识别老龄歧视或使用量表的障碍包括解释量表项目时的经验差异、对老年人态度的文化差异以及与健康的社会决定因素的潜在重叠。次要研究结果包括建议对牙科学生进行以老年人为重点的培训,以提供积极、具体的老年人护理指导:结论:我们有机会完善口腔医学生老龄歧视量表,并根据特定的国家或文化背景对量表进行调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ageism scale for dental students (ASDS): A focus group review of content validity.

Purpose/aim: Improve content validity of the Ageism Scale for Dental Students (ASDS) and identify barriers to using the scale.

Methods: Thematic analysis of transcripts of three purposively sampled focus groups of 1) geriatric dentistry specialists, 2) older adult dental patients, and 3) dental students.

Results: Twenty-five participants engaged in focus groups. No new concepts to define ageism were identified. Experts found the scale acceptable and appropriate, yet they raised specific potential revisions to scale questions. Commonly reported themes already addressed by ASDS included the importance of tailoring decision-making to patient preference and not making assumptions about older adults' capacity or preferences for dental care. Barriers to identifying ageism or using the scale included experiential differences in interpreting scale items, cultural differences in attitudes towards older adults, and potential overlap with social determinants of health. Secondary findings include recommendations for older-adult focused training for dental students to provide positive, concrete guidance on caring for older adults.

Conclusion: There are opportunities to refine the Ageism Scale for Dental Students and to allow tailoring of the scale for specific national or cultural contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Special Care in Dentistry
Special Care in Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: Special Care in Dentistry is the official journal of the Special Care Dentistry Association, the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for Persons with Disabilities, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry. It is the only journal published in North America devoted to improving oral health in people with special needs.
期刊最新文献
Oral complications associated with trigeminal trophic syndrome: A case report. Are orofacial pain assessment tools for adults who cannot self-report pain suitable for dental practice? A scoping review. Dentistry and Sturge-Weber syndrome: Case report and narrative review. Geriatric dentistry course effect against ageism among dental students: A cohort study. Exploring the oral health status of children living with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE): A caregiver described self-report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1