Yen Hoang Do, Wim van Aalderen, Ellen Dellbrügger, Claude Grenzbach, Jonathan Grigg, Ulrike Grittner, Eric Haarman, Camilo José Hernandez Toro, Bulent Karadag, Siri Roßberg, Tina-Maria Weichert, Abigail L. Whitehouse, A. Pizzulli, Paolo Maria Matricardi, S. Dramburg
{"title":"多中心随机对照试验中数字式喘息检测器的临床疗效和满意度--喘息扫描研究","authors":"Yen Hoang Do, Wim van Aalderen, Ellen Dellbrügger, Claude Grenzbach, Jonathan Grigg, Ulrike Grittner, Eric Haarman, Camilo José Hernandez Toro, Bulent Karadag, Siri Roßberg, Tina-Maria Weichert, Abigail L. Whitehouse, A. Pizzulli, Paolo Maria Matricardi, S. Dramburg","doi":"10.1183/23120541.00518-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wheezing is common in pre-school children and its clinical assessment often challenging for caretakers. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a novel digital wheeze detector (WheezeScan™, OMRON Healthcare Co. Ltd, Japan) on disease control in a home care setting.A multicenter randomised open-labeled controlled trial was conducted in Berlin, Istanbul and London. Participants aged 4–84 months with a doctor's diagnosis of recurrent wheezing in the past 12 months were included. While the control group followed usual care, the intervention group received the WheezeScan™ for at home use for 120 days. Parents completed questionnaires regarding their child's respiratory symptoms, disease-related and parental quality of life, and caretaker self-efficacy at baseline (T0), 90 days (T1), and 4 months (T2).A total of 167 children, with a mean age of 3.2 years (sd1.6), were enrolled in the study (nintervention=87; ncontrol=80). There was no statistically significant difference in wheeze control assessed by TRACK (mean difference 3.8, 95% CI −2.3–9.9; p=0.2) at T1 between treatment groups (primary outcome). Children's and parental quality of life and parental self-efficacy were comparable between both groups at T1. The evaluation of device usability and perception showed that parents found it useful.In the current study population, the wheeze detector did not show significant impact on the home management of pre-school wheezing. Hence, further research is needed to better understand how the perception and usage behavior may influence the clinical impact of a digital support.","PeriodicalId":11739,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":"9 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical efficacy and satisfaction of a digital wheeze detector in a multicenter randomised controlled trial – the WheezeScan study\",\"authors\":\"Yen Hoang Do, Wim van Aalderen, Ellen Dellbrügger, Claude Grenzbach, Jonathan Grigg, Ulrike Grittner, Eric Haarman, Camilo José Hernandez Toro, Bulent Karadag, Siri Roßberg, Tina-Maria Weichert, Abigail L. Whitehouse, A. Pizzulli, Paolo Maria Matricardi, S. Dramburg\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/23120541.00518-2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Wheezing is common in pre-school children and its clinical assessment often challenging for caretakers. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a novel digital wheeze detector (WheezeScan™, OMRON Healthcare Co. Ltd, Japan) on disease control in a home care setting.A multicenter randomised open-labeled controlled trial was conducted in Berlin, Istanbul and London. Participants aged 4–84 months with a doctor's diagnosis of recurrent wheezing in the past 12 months were included. While the control group followed usual care, the intervention group received the WheezeScan™ for at home use for 120 days. Parents completed questionnaires regarding their child's respiratory symptoms, disease-related and parental quality of life, and caretaker self-efficacy at baseline (T0), 90 days (T1), and 4 months (T2).A total of 167 children, with a mean age of 3.2 years (sd1.6), were enrolled in the study (nintervention=87; ncontrol=80). There was no statistically significant difference in wheeze control assessed by TRACK (mean difference 3.8, 95% CI −2.3–9.9; p=0.2) at T1 between treatment groups (primary outcome). Children's and parental quality of life and parental self-efficacy were comparable between both groups at T1. The evaluation of device usability and perception showed that parents found it useful.In the current study population, the wheeze detector did not show significant impact on the home management of pre-school wheezing. Hence, further research is needed to better understand how the perception and usage behavior may influence the clinical impact of a digital support.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERJ Open Research\",\"volume\":\"9 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERJ Open Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00518-2023\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00518-2023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
喘息是学龄前儿童的常见病,其临床评估对看护者来说往往具有挑战性。这项研究旨在评估新型数字式喘息检测器(WheezeScan™,日本欧姆龙医疗保健有限公司)对家庭护理环境中疾病控制的影响。这项多中心随机开放标签对照试验在柏林、伊斯坦布尔和伦敦进行,参试者年龄为 4-84 个月,经医生诊断在过去 12 个月中反复出现喘息。对照组采用常规护理方法,干预组则在家中使用 WheezeScan™ 120 天。家长在基线(T0)、90天(T1)和4个月(T2)时填写了有关孩子呼吸道症状、疾病相关生活质量、家长生活质量和看护者自我效能的问卷。治疗组与对照组在TRACK评估的喘息控制率上没有明显差异(平均差异为3.8,95% CI -2.3-9.9;P=0.2)(主要结果)。儿童和家长的生活质量以及家长的自我效能在第一阶段两组之间不相上下。在目前的研究人群中,喘息检测器对学龄前儿童喘息的家庭管理并未产生显著影响。因此,要更好地了解感知和使用行为如何影响数字支持的临床效果,还需要进一步的研究。
Clinical efficacy and satisfaction of a digital wheeze detector in a multicenter randomised controlled trial – the WheezeScan study
Wheezing is common in pre-school children and its clinical assessment often challenging for caretakers. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a novel digital wheeze detector (WheezeScan™, OMRON Healthcare Co. Ltd, Japan) on disease control in a home care setting.A multicenter randomised open-labeled controlled trial was conducted in Berlin, Istanbul and London. Participants aged 4–84 months with a doctor's diagnosis of recurrent wheezing in the past 12 months were included. While the control group followed usual care, the intervention group received the WheezeScan™ for at home use for 120 days. Parents completed questionnaires regarding their child's respiratory symptoms, disease-related and parental quality of life, and caretaker self-efficacy at baseline (T0), 90 days (T1), and 4 months (T2).A total of 167 children, with a mean age of 3.2 years (sd1.6), were enrolled in the study (nintervention=87; ncontrol=80). There was no statistically significant difference in wheeze control assessed by TRACK (mean difference 3.8, 95% CI −2.3–9.9; p=0.2) at T1 between treatment groups (primary outcome). Children's and parental quality of life and parental self-efficacy were comparable between both groups at T1. The evaluation of device usability and perception showed that parents found it useful.In the current study population, the wheeze detector did not show significant impact on the home management of pre-school wheezing. Hence, further research is needed to better understand how the perception and usage behavior may influence the clinical impact of a digital support.
期刊介绍:
ERJ Open Research is a fully open access original research journal, published online by the European Respiratory Society. The journal aims to publish high-quality work in all fields of respiratory science and medicine, covering basic science, clinical translational science and clinical medicine. The journal was created to help fulfil the ERS objective to disseminate scientific and educational material to its members and to the medical community, but also to provide researchers with an affordable open access specialty journal in which to publish their work.