通过科学计量分析可视化触摸屏研究的发展历程

IF 2.1 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Information Discovery and Delivery Pub Date : 2024-01-11 DOI:10.1108/idd-05-2023-0048
Susan Mathew K., Jovin K. Joy, Sheeja N.K.
{"title":"通过科学计量分析可视化触摸屏研究的发展历程","authors":"Susan Mathew K., Jovin K. Joy, Sheeja N.K.","doi":"10.1108/idd-05-2023-0048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to present recent trends in touchscreen research through scientometric analysis. Devices with touchscreen are powerful tools for performing specialized operations. The touch screens of tablets, smartphones, laptops and television play an important role in teaching, learning and research.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe data was collected from Web of Science database from 2011 to 2021 and analysed using MS-Excel and VOSviewer software. After analysing 389 research papers, the authors identified the high impact journals, collaboration of countries, institutions, authors and growth trend of publications. Analysing the most used keywords, country-wise distribution of publications and research collaboration between institutions will help interpret the research trends in the selected time span.\n\n\nFindings\nThe publications show an increase in number over the years from 2011 to 2021. Among the countries, USA has the highest number of 127 articles published, followed by England (61) and Canada (30). The results showed that the multiple authorship pattern in touchscreen publication is high when compared to single authors. The institutional analysis indicated that the organizations publishing more than five documents in the area were mostly from United Kingdom, Australia, USA and Korea. Timeline visualizations identified prominent keywords like touchscreen, performance, operant platform, Alzheimer’s disease, etc. in the subject. Interdisciplinary research is dominant in the subject, as seen from the most preferred journals and keywords.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe analysis does not include a comprehensive coverage of the research output, as only Web of Science database from 2011 to 2021 in a 10-year period is included.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe study would benefit stakeholders, including manufacturers and researchers alike, to know the future of touchscreen research.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThis study is pertinent to socio-psychological fields because touchscreen technology encourages social connection among older persons and may help foster early literacy skills.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper will provide an understanding of the global developments in touchscreen research with recommendations for future research.\n","PeriodicalId":43488,"journal":{"name":"Information Discovery and Delivery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visualizing the evolution of touchscreen research by scientometric analysis\",\"authors\":\"Susan Mathew K., Jovin K. Joy, Sheeja N.K.\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/idd-05-2023-0048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to present recent trends in touchscreen research through scientometric analysis. Devices with touchscreen are powerful tools for performing specialized operations. The touch screens of tablets, smartphones, laptops and television play an important role in teaching, learning and research.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe data was collected from Web of Science database from 2011 to 2021 and analysed using MS-Excel and VOSviewer software. After analysing 389 research papers, the authors identified the high impact journals, collaboration of countries, institutions, authors and growth trend of publications. Analysing the most used keywords, country-wise distribution of publications and research collaboration between institutions will help interpret the research trends in the selected time span.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe publications show an increase in number over the years from 2011 to 2021. Among the countries, USA has the highest number of 127 articles published, followed by England (61) and Canada (30). The results showed that the multiple authorship pattern in touchscreen publication is high when compared to single authors. The institutional analysis indicated that the organizations publishing more than five documents in the area were mostly from United Kingdom, Australia, USA and Korea. Timeline visualizations identified prominent keywords like touchscreen, performance, operant platform, Alzheimer’s disease, etc. in the subject. Interdisciplinary research is dominant in the subject, as seen from the most preferred journals and keywords.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe analysis does not include a comprehensive coverage of the research output, as only Web of Science database from 2011 to 2021 in a 10-year period is included.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe study would benefit stakeholders, including manufacturers and researchers alike, to know the future of touchscreen research.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nThis study is pertinent to socio-psychological fields because touchscreen technology encourages social connection among older persons and may help foster early literacy skills.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis paper will provide an understanding of the global developments in touchscreen research with recommendations for future research.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Discovery and Delivery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Discovery and Delivery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/idd-05-2023-0048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Discovery and Delivery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/idd-05-2023-0048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究旨在通过科学计量分析介绍触摸屏研究的最新趋势。带触摸屏的设备是执行专门操作的强大工具。平板电脑、智能手机、笔记本电脑和电视机的触摸屏在教学、学习和研究中发挥着重要作用。设计/方法/手段从 Web of Science 数据库中收集了 2011 年至 2021 年的数据,并使用 MS-Excel 和 VOSviewer 软件进行了分析。在分析了 389 篇研究论文后,作者确定了高影响力期刊、合作国家、机构、作者和出版物的增长趋势。对使用最多的关键词、出版物的国家分布以及机构间的研究合作进行分析,将有助于解读选定时间跨度内的研究趋势。在各国中,美国发表的论文数量最多,达到 127 篇,其次是英国(61 篇)和加拿大(30 篇)。结果表明,与单个作者相比,触摸屏出版物的多作者模式较高。机构分析表明,在该领域发表五篇以上论文的机构主要来自英国、澳大利亚、美国和韩国。时间轴可视化发现了该主题中突出的关键词,如触摸屏、性能、操作平台、老年痴呆症等。研究的局限性/意义该分析并不包括研究成果的全面覆盖,因为只包括 2011 年至 2021 年这 10 年间的 Web of Science 数据库。社会意义本研究与社会心理领域相关,因为触摸屏技术鼓励老年人之间的社会联系,并可能有助于培养早期识字技能。原创性/价值本论文将使人们了解触摸屏研究的全球发展情况,并对未来研究提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Visualizing the evolution of touchscreen research by scientometric analysis
Purpose This study aims to present recent trends in touchscreen research through scientometric analysis. Devices with touchscreen are powerful tools for performing specialized operations. The touch screens of tablets, smartphones, laptops and television play an important role in teaching, learning and research. Design/methodology/approach The data was collected from Web of Science database from 2011 to 2021 and analysed using MS-Excel and VOSviewer software. After analysing 389 research papers, the authors identified the high impact journals, collaboration of countries, institutions, authors and growth trend of publications. Analysing the most used keywords, country-wise distribution of publications and research collaboration between institutions will help interpret the research trends in the selected time span. Findings The publications show an increase in number over the years from 2011 to 2021. Among the countries, USA has the highest number of 127 articles published, followed by England (61) and Canada (30). The results showed that the multiple authorship pattern in touchscreen publication is high when compared to single authors. The institutional analysis indicated that the organizations publishing more than five documents in the area were mostly from United Kingdom, Australia, USA and Korea. Timeline visualizations identified prominent keywords like touchscreen, performance, operant platform, Alzheimer’s disease, etc. in the subject. Interdisciplinary research is dominant in the subject, as seen from the most preferred journals and keywords. Research limitations/implications The analysis does not include a comprehensive coverage of the research output, as only Web of Science database from 2011 to 2021 in a 10-year period is included. Practical implications The study would benefit stakeholders, including manufacturers and researchers alike, to know the future of touchscreen research. Social implications This study is pertinent to socio-psychological fields because touchscreen technology encourages social connection among older persons and may help foster early literacy skills. Originality/value This paper will provide an understanding of the global developments in touchscreen research with recommendations for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information Discovery and Delivery
Information Discovery and Delivery INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Information Discovery and Delivery covers information discovery and access for digital information researchers. This includes educators, knowledge professionals in education and cultural organisations, knowledge managers in media, health care and government, as well as librarians. The journal publishes research and practice which explores the digital information supply chain ie transport, flows, tracking, exchange and sharing, including within and between libraries. It is also interested in digital information capture, packaging and storage by ‘collectors’ of all kinds. Information is widely defined, including but not limited to: Records, Documents, Learning objects, Visual and sound files, Data and metadata and , User-generated content.
期刊最新文献
Chatbot integration for online shopping: a bibliometric review and future research agenda Chatbot integration for online shopping: a bibliometric review and future research agenda The role of suspicious accounts in setting political discourse: a study of the Pakistani Twitter space Detached effects of doom scrolling on Generation Z employee performance in the Indian information technology sector The role of suspicious accounts in setting political discourse: a study of the Pakistani Twitter space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1