利用共同创造应对监测和评估挑战:南非评估黑客马拉松的经验

IF 2.4 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Evaluation Pub Date : 2024-01-10 DOI:10.1177/13563890231223174
Eleanor Hazell, Ian Goldman, B. Rabie, Jen Norins, T. Chirau, Taruna Gupta
{"title":"利用共同创造应对监测和评估挑战:南非评估黑客马拉松的经验","authors":"Eleanor Hazell, Ian Goldman, B. Rabie, Jen Norins, T. Chirau, Taruna Gupta","doi":"10.1177/13563890231223174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2021, the South African Monitoring and Evaluation Association facilitated an evaluation hackathon that engaged diverse stakeholders in co-creation processes to develop practical solutions to address complex problems facing the monitoring and evaluation sector. The event catalysed broad-based ownership and enabled the South African Monitoring and Evaluation Association to coordinate the creative energy, commitment and resources of its members, government and other partners to achieve outcomes that would not be possible to achieve otherwise. The article analyses the co-creation approach adopted for the hackathon across four phases, namely initiation, process design/planning, co-design and development and application/follow-up. A retrospective analysis of the process and results identified eight key elements that enabled or impeded the successful completion of hackathon outputs and their conversion into useful products. These elements are facilitative leadership, purposive stakeholder selection, a well-delimited task, preparation, process facilitation, a valued product, voluntary contributions and further capacity. The lessons learnt provide useful insight for future efforts to generate localised, contextualised responses to evaluation problems.","PeriodicalId":47511,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation","volume":"75 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using co-creation to address monitoring and evaluation challenges: The experience of South Africa’s evaluation hackathon\",\"authors\":\"Eleanor Hazell, Ian Goldman, B. Rabie, Jen Norins, T. Chirau, Taruna Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13563890231223174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2021, the South African Monitoring and Evaluation Association facilitated an evaluation hackathon that engaged diverse stakeholders in co-creation processes to develop practical solutions to address complex problems facing the monitoring and evaluation sector. The event catalysed broad-based ownership and enabled the South African Monitoring and Evaluation Association to coordinate the creative energy, commitment and resources of its members, government and other partners to achieve outcomes that would not be possible to achieve otherwise. The article analyses the co-creation approach adopted for the hackathon across four phases, namely initiation, process design/planning, co-design and development and application/follow-up. A retrospective analysis of the process and results identified eight key elements that enabled or impeded the successful completion of hackathon outputs and their conversion into useful products. These elements are facilitative leadership, purposive stakeholder selection, a well-delimited task, preparation, process facilitation, a valued product, voluntary contributions and further capacity. The lessons learnt provide useful insight for future efforts to generate localised, contextualised responses to evaluation problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"75 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890231223174\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890231223174","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2021 年,南非监测与评价协会促成了一次评价黑客马拉松活动,让不同的利益攸关方 参与共同创造过程,以制定切实可行的解决方案,解决监测与评价部门面临的复杂问题。该活动促进了基础广泛的自主权,使南非监测与评价协会能够协调其成员、政府和其他合作伙伴的创造力、承诺和资源,以取得其他方式不可能取得的成果。文章分析了黑客马拉松在四个阶段采用的共同创造方法,即启动、流程设计/规划、共同设计和开发以及应用/跟进。通过对过程和结果的回顾分析,确定了促成或阻碍黑客马拉松成功完成产出并将其转化为有用产品的八个关键要素。这些要素是:促进性领导、有目的的利益相关者选择、明确限定的任务、准备、过程促进、有价值的产品、自愿贡献和进一步的能力。这些经验教训为今后针对评估问题采取因地制宜的对策提供了有益的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using co-creation to address monitoring and evaluation challenges: The experience of South Africa’s evaluation hackathon
In 2021, the South African Monitoring and Evaluation Association facilitated an evaluation hackathon that engaged diverse stakeholders in co-creation processes to develop practical solutions to address complex problems facing the monitoring and evaluation sector. The event catalysed broad-based ownership and enabled the South African Monitoring and Evaluation Association to coordinate the creative energy, commitment and resources of its members, government and other partners to achieve outcomes that would not be possible to achieve otherwise. The article analyses the co-creation approach adopted for the hackathon across four phases, namely initiation, process design/planning, co-design and development and application/follow-up. A retrospective analysis of the process and results identified eight key elements that enabled or impeded the successful completion of hackathon outputs and their conversion into useful products. These elements are facilitative leadership, purposive stakeholder selection, a well-delimited task, preparation, process facilitation, a valued product, voluntary contributions and further capacity. The lessons learnt provide useful insight for future efforts to generate localised, contextualised responses to evaluation problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation
Evaluation SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Using co-creation to address monitoring and evaluation challenges: The experience of South Africa’s evaluation hackathon What role should we play to be effective evaluators? – practitioner reflections Principles and methods to advance value for money Evaluating site selection at design in food systems interventions: A formative geospatial approach What works in democracy support? How to fill evidence and usability gaps through evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1