我们能在多大程度上从过去的流行病中吸取教训:对利比里亚选定村庄的移动电话调查

Elisa Maria Maffioli, Daisey Yu
{"title":"我们能在多大程度上从过去的流行病中吸取教训:对利比里亚选定村庄的移动电话调查","authors":"Elisa Maria Maffioli, Daisey Yu","doi":"10.29392/001c.91545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Epidemics remain a major threat, impacting lives around the globe. We ask whether and to what extent individuals learn from past epidemics in Liberia, a country affected by both the 2014-2016 Ebola Virus Disease and COVID-19. We explored the association between being exposed to the 2014–2016 Ebola epidemic and measures of beliefs, intentions, and behavior during COVID-19. We interviewed 600 respondents three times over seven years, sampled by an initial list of 2,265 respondents in 571 villages across all of Liberia selected through Random Digit Dialing (RDD) in 2015-2016. We used an Ordinary Least Square (OLS) model, controlling for county fixed effects and a set of socio-demographic and economic covariates. Because of the selection among individuals with mobile phones, most respondents were male, educated, and were more likely to be from urban areas and wealthy. They were, on average, 33.9 (SD=10.4) years old, 66% were Catholic, and only 23% were unemployed. 22.8% of respondents reported that they knew someone in their community who got or was suspected of having Ebola; 13.7% were exposed to COVID-19, while 4.5% were exposed to both epidemics. We found that those exposed to Ebola were less likely to have wrong beliefs about the virus and how to cure it; they were also more likely to state that they would go to the health facility for important needs such as birth delivery and child routine vaccination; and, they were more likely to get vaccinated during COVID-19. The findings are primarily driven by individuals with low trust in the government. This research suggests that individuals who experience a previous epidemic learned from it and might be more responsive to correct information and better respond to a future one. This has policy implications for patient education and awareness campaigns during the next epidemic.","PeriodicalId":73759,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global health reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To what extent do we learn from past epidemics: a mobile phone survey of selected villages in Liberia\",\"authors\":\"Elisa Maria Maffioli, Daisey Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.29392/001c.91545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Epidemics remain a major threat, impacting lives around the globe. We ask whether and to what extent individuals learn from past epidemics in Liberia, a country affected by both the 2014-2016 Ebola Virus Disease and COVID-19. We explored the association between being exposed to the 2014–2016 Ebola epidemic and measures of beliefs, intentions, and behavior during COVID-19. We interviewed 600 respondents three times over seven years, sampled by an initial list of 2,265 respondents in 571 villages across all of Liberia selected through Random Digit Dialing (RDD) in 2015-2016. We used an Ordinary Least Square (OLS) model, controlling for county fixed effects and a set of socio-demographic and economic covariates. Because of the selection among individuals with mobile phones, most respondents were male, educated, and were more likely to be from urban areas and wealthy. They were, on average, 33.9 (SD=10.4) years old, 66% were Catholic, and only 23% were unemployed. 22.8% of respondents reported that they knew someone in their community who got or was suspected of having Ebola; 13.7% were exposed to COVID-19, while 4.5% were exposed to both epidemics. We found that those exposed to Ebola were less likely to have wrong beliefs about the virus and how to cure it; they were also more likely to state that they would go to the health facility for important needs such as birth delivery and child routine vaccination; and, they were more likely to get vaccinated during COVID-19. The findings are primarily driven by individuals with low trust in the government. This research suggests that individuals who experience a previous epidemic learned from it and might be more responsive to correct information and better respond to a future one. This has policy implications for patient education and awareness campaigns during the next epidemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of global health reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of global health reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29392/001c.91545\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global health reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29392/001c.91545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

流行病仍然是一个重大威胁,影响着全球各地的生命。利比里亚是一个同时受到 2014-2016 年埃博拉病毒病和 COVID-19 影响的国家,我们在利比里亚探究了个人是否以及在多大程度上从过去的流行病中吸取了教训。我们探讨了接触 2014-2016 年埃博拉疫情与 COVID-19 期间的信念、意向和行为测量之间的关联。我们在 7 年内对 600 名受访者进行了 3 次访谈,这些受访者是从 2015-2016 年通过随机数字拨号(RDD)在利比里亚全国 571 个村庄中选出的 2265 名受访者的初始名单中抽取的。我们使用了普通最小二乘法(OLS)模型,控制了州的固定效应以及一系列社会人口和经济协变量。由于是从拥有手机的个人中进行选择,大多数受访者为男性,受过教育,更有可能来自城市地区和富裕阶层。他们的平均年龄为 33.9 岁(SD=10.4),66% 的人信奉天主教,只有 23% 的人失业。22.8%的受访者称,他们知道社区中有人感染或疑似感染了埃博拉病毒;13.7%的受访者感染了COVID-19,4.5%的受访者同时感染了两种流行病。我们发现,那些感染过埃博拉病毒的人不太可能对病毒和如何治愈病毒有错误的认识;他们也更有可能表示,如果有分娩和儿童常规疫苗接种等重要需求,他们会去医疗机构;而且,他们更有可能在 COVID-19 期间接种疫苗。这些发现主要是由对政府信任度较低的个人造成的。这项研究表明,经历过前一次流行病的人从中吸取了教训,可能会对正确的信息做出更积极的反应,更好地应对未来的流行病。这对下一次流行病期间的患者教育和宣传活动具有政策意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
To what extent do we learn from past epidemics: a mobile phone survey of selected villages in Liberia
Epidemics remain a major threat, impacting lives around the globe. We ask whether and to what extent individuals learn from past epidemics in Liberia, a country affected by both the 2014-2016 Ebola Virus Disease and COVID-19. We explored the association between being exposed to the 2014–2016 Ebola epidemic and measures of beliefs, intentions, and behavior during COVID-19. We interviewed 600 respondents three times over seven years, sampled by an initial list of 2,265 respondents in 571 villages across all of Liberia selected through Random Digit Dialing (RDD) in 2015-2016. We used an Ordinary Least Square (OLS) model, controlling for county fixed effects and a set of socio-demographic and economic covariates. Because of the selection among individuals with mobile phones, most respondents were male, educated, and were more likely to be from urban areas and wealthy. They were, on average, 33.9 (SD=10.4) years old, 66% were Catholic, and only 23% were unemployed. 22.8% of respondents reported that they knew someone in their community who got or was suspected of having Ebola; 13.7% were exposed to COVID-19, while 4.5% were exposed to both epidemics. We found that those exposed to Ebola were less likely to have wrong beliefs about the virus and how to cure it; they were also more likely to state that they would go to the health facility for important needs such as birth delivery and child routine vaccination; and, they were more likely to get vaccinated during COVID-19. The findings are primarily driven by individuals with low trust in the government. This research suggests that individuals who experience a previous epidemic learned from it and might be more responsive to correct information and better respond to a future one. This has policy implications for patient education and awareness campaigns during the next epidemic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implementation of Nigeria’s surgical plan: leveraging media engagement for cleft lip and palate to drive advocacy for access to surgical healthcare Digital health interventions in primary care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic scoping review protocol Developing conceptual framework and methodological considerations in community-supported chronic disease management Using spirometry for screening and diagnosis of chronic respiratory diseases in primary health care: findings from a community health project in rural India Maternal health in cities: analysis of institutional maternal mortality and health system bottlenecks in Kampala City Uganda, 2016-2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1