{"title":"加利福尼亚海岸的罗斯比波向西传播为何 \"太快\"?","authors":"A. J. Clarke, Sean Buchanan","doi":"10.1175/jpo-d-23-0024.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPast work has shown that interannual California coastal sea level variability is mostly of equatorial origin, and decades of satellite sea surface height (SSH) and in situ dynamic height observations indicate that this interannual signal propagates westward from the California coast as nondispersive Rossby waves (RWs). These observations agree with standard linear vertical mode theory except that even when mean flow and bottom topography are considered, the fastest baroclinic vertical mode RW in each case is always much slower (1.6 – 2.3 cm/s) than the observed 4.2 cm/s. This order one disagreement is only resolved if the standard bottom boundary condition that the vertical velocity w′ = 0 is replaced by perturbation pressure p′ = 0. Zero p′ is an appropriate bottom boundary condition because south of San Francisco the northeastern Pacific Ocean boundary acts approximately like an impermeable vertical wall to the interannual equatorial wave signal, and therefore equatorial quasi-geostrophic p′ is horizontally constant along the boundary. Thus if equatorial p′ = 0 at the bottom, then this condition also applies off California. The large-scale equatorial ocean boundary signal is due to wind-forced eastward group velocity equatorial Kelvin waves, which at interannual and lower frequencies propagate at such a shallow angle to the horizontal that none of the baroclinic equatorial Kelvin wave signal reaches the ocean floor before striking the eastern Pacific boundary. Off California this signal can thus be approximated by a first baroclinic mode with p′ = 0 at the bottom, and hence the long RW speed there agrees with that observed (both approximately 4.2 cm/s).","PeriodicalId":56115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physical Oceanography","volume":"32 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why is the Westward Rossby Wave Propagation from the California Coast “Too Fast”?\",\"authors\":\"A. J. Clarke, Sean Buchanan\",\"doi\":\"10.1175/jpo-d-23-0024.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPast work has shown that interannual California coastal sea level variability is mostly of equatorial origin, and decades of satellite sea surface height (SSH) and in situ dynamic height observations indicate that this interannual signal propagates westward from the California coast as nondispersive Rossby waves (RWs). These observations agree with standard linear vertical mode theory except that even when mean flow and bottom topography are considered, the fastest baroclinic vertical mode RW in each case is always much slower (1.6 – 2.3 cm/s) than the observed 4.2 cm/s. This order one disagreement is only resolved if the standard bottom boundary condition that the vertical velocity w′ = 0 is replaced by perturbation pressure p′ = 0. Zero p′ is an appropriate bottom boundary condition because south of San Francisco the northeastern Pacific Ocean boundary acts approximately like an impermeable vertical wall to the interannual equatorial wave signal, and therefore equatorial quasi-geostrophic p′ is horizontally constant along the boundary. Thus if equatorial p′ = 0 at the bottom, then this condition also applies off California. The large-scale equatorial ocean boundary signal is due to wind-forced eastward group velocity equatorial Kelvin waves, which at interannual and lower frequencies propagate at such a shallow angle to the horizontal that none of the baroclinic equatorial Kelvin wave signal reaches the ocean floor before striking the eastern Pacific boundary. Off California this signal can thus be approximated by a first baroclinic mode with p′ = 0 at the bottom, and hence the long RW speed there agrees with that observed (both approximately 4.2 cm/s).\",\"PeriodicalId\":56115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physical Oceanography\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physical Oceanography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1175/jpo-d-23-0024.1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OCEANOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physical Oceanography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jpo-d-23-0024.1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Why is the Westward Rossby Wave Propagation from the California Coast “Too Fast”?
Past work has shown that interannual California coastal sea level variability is mostly of equatorial origin, and decades of satellite sea surface height (SSH) and in situ dynamic height observations indicate that this interannual signal propagates westward from the California coast as nondispersive Rossby waves (RWs). These observations agree with standard linear vertical mode theory except that even when mean flow and bottom topography are considered, the fastest baroclinic vertical mode RW in each case is always much slower (1.6 – 2.3 cm/s) than the observed 4.2 cm/s. This order one disagreement is only resolved if the standard bottom boundary condition that the vertical velocity w′ = 0 is replaced by perturbation pressure p′ = 0. Zero p′ is an appropriate bottom boundary condition because south of San Francisco the northeastern Pacific Ocean boundary acts approximately like an impermeable vertical wall to the interannual equatorial wave signal, and therefore equatorial quasi-geostrophic p′ is horizontally constant along the boundary. Thus if equatorial p′ = 0 at the bottom, then this condition also applies off California. The large-scale equatorial ocean boundary signal is due to wind-forced eastward group velocity equatorial Kelvin waves, which at interannual and lower frequencies propagate at such a shallow angle to the horizontal that none of the baroclinic equatorial Kelvin wave signal reaches the ocean floor before striking the eastern Pacific boundary. Off California this signal can thus be approximated by a first baroclinic mode with p′ = 0 at the bottom, and hence the long RW speed there agrees with that observed (both approximately 4.2 cm/s).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Physical Oceanography (JPO) (ISSN: 0022-3670; eISSN: 1520-0485) publishes research related to the physics of the ocean and to processes operating at its boundaries. Observational, theoretical, and modeling studies are all welcome, especially those that focus on elucidating specific physical processes. Papers that investigate interactions with other components of the Earth system (e.g., ocean–atmosphere, physical–biological, and physical–chemical interactions) as well as studies of other fluid systems (e.g., lakes and laboratory tanks) are also invited, as long as their focus is on understanding the ocean or its role in the Earth system.