Dennis P Watson, Martha Tillson, L. Taylor, Huiping Xu, Fangqian Ouyang, Francesca L. Beaudoin, Daniel O’Donnell, Alan B. McGuire
{"title":"POINT 实用随机试验的结果:以急诊科为基础的同伴支持专家干预措施:增加阿片类药物使用障碍治疗链接并减少复发性用药过量","authors":"Dennis P Watson, Martha Tillson, L. Taylor, Huiping Xu, Fangqian Ouyang, Francesca L. Beaudoin, Daniel O’Donnell, Alan B. McGuire","doi":"10.1177/29767342231221054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"People with opioid use disorder (OUD) frequently present at the emergency department (ED), a potentially critical point for intervention and treatment linkage. Peer recovery support specialist (PRSS) interventions have expanded in US-based EDs, although evidence supporting such interventions has not been firmly established. Researchers conducted a pragmatic trial of POINT (Project Planned Outreach, Intervention, Naloxone, and Treatment), an ED-initiated intervention for harm reduction and recovery coaching/treatment linkage in 2 Indiana EDs. Cluster randomization allocated patients to the POINT intervention (n = 157) versus a control condition (n = 86). Participants completed a structured interview, and all outcomes were assessed using administrative data from an extensive state health exchange and state systems. Target patients (n = 243) presented to the ED for a possible opioid-related reason. The primary outcome was overdose-related ED re-presentation. Key secondary outcomes included OUD medication treatment linkage, duration of medication in days, all-cause ED re-presentation, all-cause inpatient re-presentation, and Medicaid enrollment. All outcomes were assessed at 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-enrollment. Ad hoc analyses were performed to assess treatment motivation and readiness. POINT and standard care participants did not differ significantly on any outcomes measured. Participants who presented to the ED for overdose had significantly lower scores (3.5 vs 4.2, P < .01) regarding readiness to begin treatment compared to those presenting for other opioid-related issues. This is the first randomized trial investigating overdose outcomes for an ED peer recovery support specialist intervention. Though underpowered, results suggest no benefit of PRSS services over standard care. Given the scope of PRSS, future work in this area should assess more recovery- and harm reduction-oriented outcomes, as well as the potential benefits of integrating PRSS within multimodal ED-based interventions for OUD.","PeriodicalId":516178,"journal":{"name":"Substance Use &amp; Addiction Journal","volume":"89 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Results From the POINT Pragmatic Randomized Trial: An Emergency Department-Based Peer Support Specialist Intervention to Increase Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Linkage and Reduce Recurrent Overdose\",\"authors\":\"Dennis P Watson, Martha Tillson, L. Taylor, Huiping Xu, Fangqian Ouyang, Francesca L. Beaudoin, Daniel O’Donnell, Alan B. McGuire\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/29767342231221054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"People with opioid use disorder (OUD) frequently present at the emergency department (ED), a potentially critical point for intervention and treatment linkage. Peer recovery support specialist (PRSS) interventions have expanded in US-based EDs, although evidence supporting such interventions has not been firmly established. Researchers conducted a pragmatic trial of POINT (Project Planned Outreach, Intervention, Naloxone, and Treatment), an ED-initiated intervention for harm reduction and recovery coaching/treatment linkage in 2 Indiana EDs. Cluster randomization allocated patients to the POINT intervention (n = 157) versus a control condition (n = 86). Participants completed a structured interview, and all outcomes were assessed using administrative data from an extensive state health exchange and state systems. Target patients (n = 243) presented to the ED for a possible opioid-related reason. The primary outcome was overdose-related ED re-presentation. Key secondary outcomes included OUD medication treatment linkage, duration of medication in days, all-cause ED re-presentation, all-cause inpatient re-presentation, and Medicaid enrollment. All outcomes were assessed at 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-enrollment. Ad hoc analyses were performed to assess treatment motivation and readiness. POINT and standard care participants did not differ significantly on any outcomes measured. Participants who presented to the ED for overdose had significantly lower scores (3.5 vs 4.2, P < .01) regarding readiness to begin treatment compared to those presenting for other opioid-related issues. This is the first randomized trial investigating overdose outcomes for an ED peer recovery support specialist intervention. Though underpowered, results suggest no benefit of PRSS services over standard care. Given the scope of PRSS, future work in this area should assess more recovery- and harm reduction-oriented outcomes, as well as the potential benefits of integrating PRSS within multimodal ED-based interventions for OUD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Substance Use &amp; Addiction Journal\",\"volume\":\"89 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Substance Use &amp; Addiction Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342231221054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Use &amp; Addiction Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342231221054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者经常到急诊科(ED)就诊,而急诊科是进行干预和治疗联系的潜在关键点。同伴康复支持专家(PRSS)干预措施已在美国的急诊科得到推广,但支持此类干预措施的证据尚未得到牢固确立。研究人员在印第安纳州的两家急诊室对 POINT(项目计划推广、干预、纳洛酮和治疗)进行了一项实用性试验,这是一项由急诊室发起的减少伤害和康复指导/治疗链接干预措施。分组随机将患者分配到 POINT 干预(157 人)和对照组(86 人)。参与者完成了结构化访谈,所有结果均使用来自广泛的州健康交易所和州系统的管理数据进行评估。目标患者(n = 243)因可能与阿片类药物相关的原因就诊于急诊室。主要结果是与用药过量相关的急诊室再次就诊。主要次要结果包括阿片类药物治疗连接、用药天数、所有原因的急诊室再次就诊、所有原因的住院病人再次就诊以及医疗补助注册。所有结果均在注册后 3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月进行评估。为评估治疗动机和准备情况,还进行了特别分析。POINT 参与者与标准护理参与者在任何测量结果上都没有显著差异。与因其他阿片类药物相关问题就诊的患者相比,因用药过量就诊于急诊室的患者在开始治疗的意愿方面得分明显较低(3.5 vs 4.2,P < .01)。这是首次对急诊室同伴康复支持专家干预的用药过量结果进行调查的随机试验。尽管试验结果显示,PRSS 服务与标准护理相比并无益处。考虑到 PRSS 的范围,该领域未来的工作应评估更多的以恢复和减少伤害为导向的结果,以及将 PRSS 纳入基于多模式 ED 的 OUD 干预措施的潜在益处。
Results From the POINT Pragmatic Randomized Trial: An Emergency Department-Based Peer Support Specialist Intervention to Increase Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Linkage and Reduce Recurrent Overdose
People with opioid use disorder (OUD) frequently present at the emergency department (ED), a potentially critical point for intervention and treatment linkage. Peer recovery support specialist (PRSS) interventions have expanded in US-based EDs, although evidence supporting such interventions has not been firmly established. Researchers conducted a pragmatic trial of POINT (Project Planned Outreach, Intervention, Naloxone, and Treatment), an ED-initiated intervention for harm reduction and recovery coaching/treatment linkage in 2 Indiana EDs. Cluster randomization allocated patients to the POINT intervention (n = 157) versus a control condition (n = 86). Participants completed a structured interview, and all outcomes were assessed using administrative data from an extensive state health exchange and state systems. Target patients (n = 243) presented to the ED for a possible opioid-related reason. The primary outcome was overdose-related ED re-presentation. Key secondary outcomes included OUD medication treatment linkage, duration of medication in days, all-cause ED re-presentation, all-cause inpatient re-presentation, and Medicaid enrollment. All outcomes were assessed at 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-enrollment. Ad hoc analyses were performed to assess treatment motivation and readiness. POINT and standard care participants did not differ significantly on any outcomes measured. Participants who presented to the ED for overdose had significantly lower scores (3.5 vs 4.2, P < .01) regarding readiness to begin treatment compared to those presenting for other opioid-related issues. This is the first randomized trial investigating overdose outcomes for an ED peer recovery support specialist intervention. Though underpowered, results suggest no benefit of PRSS services over standard care. Given the scope of PRSS, future work in this area should assess more recovery- and harm reduction-oriented outcomes, as well as the potential benefits of integrating PRSS within multimodal ED-based interventions for OUD.