对弗拉芒大肠癌筛查计划中 FIT 阳性后进行结肠镜检查的个人看法和经历的深入了解

S. Hoeck, T. Tran
{"title":"对弗拉芒大肠癌筛查计划中 FIT 阳性后进行结肠镜检查的个人看法和经历的深入了解","authors":"S. Hoeck, T. Tran","doi":"10.3390/gidisord6010004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A timely diagnostic colonoscopy (DC) after a positive FIT result is crucial for effective colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. In the Flemish CRC screening program (CRC-SP), 17% of FIT-positive participants had no DC in 2020. This study explores self-reported barriers, experiences, and perceptions about DC in FIT-positive participants. Methods: An online survey combining qualitative and quantitative approaches was sent by email to FIT-positive participants (November 2019–September 2020). Results: Out of 5134 invitees, 1597 respondents (31.1%) completed the survey. Among them, 77.5% had undergone/planned a DC, while 22.5% were unwilling to undergo a DC. DC perceptions, expectations, and experiences differed among groups; 57% of the ‘DC-performed’ group reported better-than-expected experiences. A substantial portion of the ‘DC-naïve’ group anticipated pain (42%) and embarrassment (30%), while the actual experience in the ‘DC-performed’ group was much lower (6.4% and 3.2%, respectively). GP advice, support from close contacts, and colonoscopy experiencers trigger DC planning, whereas lack of symptoms, false-positive perception, fears, and embarrassment were identified as barriers to DC. Conclusions: The study reveals barriers/facilitators for a DC in the Flemish CRC-SP. The findings inform targeted interventions for improved DC completion and its impact, including patient navigation and testimonial videos of ‘colonoscopy experiencers’ to address DC misperceptions.","PeriodicalId":507842,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insights into Personal Perceptions and Experiences of Colonoscopy after Positive FIT in the Flemish Colorectal Cancer Screening Program\",\"authors\":\"S. Hoeck, T. Tran\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/gidisord6010004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: A timely diagnostic colonoscopy (DC) after a positive FIT result is crucial for effective colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. In the Flemish CRC screening program (CRC-SP), 17% of FIT-positive participants had no DC in 2020. This study explores self-reported barriers, experiences, and perceptions about DC in FIT-positive participants. Methods: An online survey combining qualitative and quantitative approaches was sent by email to FIT-positive participants (November 2019–September 2020). Results: Out of 5134 invitees, 1597 respondents (31.1%) completed the survey. Among them, 77.5% had undergone/planned a DC, while 22.5% were unwilling to undergo a DC. DC perceptions, expectations, and experiences differed among groups; 57% of the ‘DC-performed’ group reported better-than-expected experiences. A substantial portion of the ‘DC-naïve’ group anticipated pain (42%) and embarrassment (30%), while the actual experience in the ‘DC-performed’ group was much lower (6.4% and 3.2%, respectively). GP advice, support from close contacts, and colonoscopy experiencers trigger DC planning, whereas lack of symptoms, false-positive perception, fears, and embarrassment were identified as barriers to DC. Conclusions: The study reveals barriers/facilitators for a DC in the Flemish CRC-SP. The findings inform targeted interventions for improved DC completion and its impact, including patient navigation and testimonial videos of ‘colonoscopy experiencers’ to address DC misperceptions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastrointestinal Disorders\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastrointestinal Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/gidisord6010004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/gidisord6010004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在 FIT 结果呈阳性后及时进行结肠镜(DC)诊断对于有效筛查结直肠癌(CRC)至关重要。在弗拉芒大肠癌筛查项目(CRC-SP)中,17% 的 FIT 阳性参与者在 2020 年没有进行过大肠镜检查。本研究探讨了 FIT 阳性参与者自我报告的关于 DC 的障碍、经验和看法。方法:通过电子邮件向 FIT 阳性参与者(2019 年 11 月至 2020 年 9 月)发送结合定性和定量方法的在线调查。调查结果显示在 5134 名受邀者中,1597 名受访者(31.1%)完成了调查。其中,77.5%的受访者已接受/计划接受直肠指诊,22.5%的受访者不愿意接受直肠指诊。不同组别的受访者对区委会的看法、期望和经历各不相同;57%的 "已接受区委会 "组别受访者表示其经历好于预期。在 "不了解直肠指诊 "组中,有相当一部分人预期会感到疼痛(42%)和尴尬(30%),而在 "已接受直肠指诊 "组中,实际体验要低得多(分别为 6.4% 和 3.2%)。全科医生的建议、密切接触者的支持和结肠镜检查经验者会触发患者的结肠镜检查计划,而缺乏症状、假阳性感知、恐惧和尴尬则被认为是结肠镜检查的障碍。结论:该研究揭示了弗拉芒地区 CRC-SP 结肠镜检查的障碍/促进因素。研究结果为改善结肠镜检查的完成情况及其影响提供了有针对性的干预措施,包括患者导航和 "结肠镜检查体验者 "的感言视频,以消除对结肠镜检查的误解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Insights into Personal Perceptions and Experiences of Colonoscopy after Positive FIT in the Flemish Colorectal Cancer Screening Program
Background: A timely diagnostic colonoscopy (DC) after a positive FIT result is crucial for effective colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. In the Flemish CRC screening program (CRC-SP), 17% of FIT-positive participants had no DC in 2020. This study explores self-reported barriers, experiences, and perceptions about DC in FIT-positive participants. Methods: An online survey combining qualitative and quantitative approaches was sent by email to FIT-positive participants (November 2019–September 2020). Results: Out of 5134 invitees, 1597 respondents (31.1%) completed the survey. Among them, 77.5% had undergone/planned a DC, while 22.5% were unwilling to undergo a DC. DC perceptions, expectations, and experiences differed among groups; 57% of the ‘DC-performed’ group reported better-than-expected experiences. A substantial portion of the ‘DC-naïve’ group anticipated pain (42%) and embarrassment (30%), while the actual experience in the ‘DC-performed’ group was much lower (6.4% and 3.2%, respectively). GP advice, support from close contacts, and colonoscopy experiencers trigger DC planning, whereas lack of symptoms, false-positive perception, fears, and embarrassment were identified as barriers to DC. Conclusions: The study reveals barriers/facilitators for a DC in the Flemish CRC-SP. The findings inform targeted interventions for improved DC completion and its impact, including patient navigation and testimonial videos of ‘colonoscopy experiencers’ to address DC misperceptions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Actitan: A Natural Complex for Managing Diarrhea—Insights from Cross-Sectional Survey Research Involving Patients, Pharmacists and Physicians The Impact of a Gluten-Free Diet on Pregnant Women with Celiac Disease: Do We Need a Guideline to Manage Their Health? Reliability of Kudo’s Glandular Pit Pattern in Predicting Colorectal Lesion Histology at Routine Colonoscopy with Digital Chromoendoscopy Biologics in Focus: A Comprehensive Review of Current Biological and Small Molecules Therapies for Crohn’s Disease in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Risk of Hemorrhoidal Bleeding in Patients Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1