利用表观遗传起搏器识别表观遗传衰老调节器

IF 2.8 Q2 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY Frontiers in bioinformatics Pub Date : 2024-01-03 DOI:10.3389/fbinf.2023.1308680
Colin Farrell, Chanyue Hu, Kalsuda Lapborisuth, Kyle Pu, S. Snir, Matteo Pellegrini
{"title":"利用表观遗传起搏器识别表观遗传衰老调节器","authors":"Colin Farrell, Chanyue Hu, Kalsuda Lapborisuth, Kyle Pu, S. Snir, Matteo Pellegrini","doi":"10.3389/fbinf.2023.1308680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Epigenetic clocks are DNA methylation-based chronological age prediction models that are commonly employed to study age-related biology. The difference between the predicted and observed age is often interpreted as a form of biological age acceleration, and many studies have measured the impact of environmental and disease-associated factors on epigenetic age. Most epigenetic clocks are fit using approaches that minimize the error between the predicted and observed chronological age, and as a result, they may not accurately model the impact of factors that moderate the relationship between the actual and epigenetic age. Here, we compare epigenetic clocks that are constructed using penalized regression methods to an evolutionary framework of epigenetic aging with the epigenetic pacemaker (EPM), which directly models DNA methylation as a function of a time-dependent epigenetic state. In simulations, we show that the value of the epigenetic state is impacted by factors such as age, sex, and cell-type composition. Next, in a dataset aggregated from previous studies, we show that the epigenetic state is also moderated by sex and the cell type. Finally, we demonstrate that the epigenetic state is also moderated by toxins in a study on polybrominated biphenyl exposure. Thus, we find that the pacemaker provides a robust framework for the study of factors that impact epigenetic age acceleration and that the effect of these factors may be obscured in traditional clocks based on linear regression models.","PeriodicalId":73066,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in bioinformatics","volume":"47 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying epigenetic aging moderators using the epigenetic pacemaker\",\"authors\":\"Colin Farrell, Chanyue Hu, Kalsuda Lapborisuth, Kyle Pu, S. Snir, Matteo Pellegrini\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fbinf.2023.1308680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Epigenetic clocks are DNA methylation-based chronological age prediction models that are commonly employed to study age-related biology. The difference between the predicted and observed age is often interpreted as a form of biological age acceleration, and many studies have measured the impact of environmental and disease-associated factors on epigenetic age. Most epigenetic clocks are fit using approaches that minimize the error between the predicted and observed chronological age, and as a result, they may not accurately model the impact of factors that moderate the relationship between the actual and epigenetic age. Here, we compare epigenetic clocks that are constructed using penalized regression methods to an evolutionary framework of epigenetic aging with the epigenetic pacemaker (EPM), which directly models DNA methylation as a function of a time-dependent epigenetic state. In simulations, we show that the value of the epigenetic state is impacted by factors such as age, sex, and cell-type composition. Next, in a dataset aggregated from previous studies, we show that the epigenetic state is also moderated by sex and the cell type. Finally, we demonstrate that the epigenetic state is also moderated by toxins in a study on polybrominated biphenyl exposure. Thus, we find that the pacemaker provides a robust framework for the study of factors that impact epigenetic age acceleration and that the effect of these factors may be obscured in traditional clocks based on linear regression models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in bioinformatics\",\"volume\":\"47 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in bioinformatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbinf.2023.1308680\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbinf.2023.1308680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

表观遗传时钟是基于 DNA 甲基化的年代年龄预测模型,通常用于研究与年龄相关的生物学。预测年龄与观察年龄之间的差异通常被解释为一种生物年龄加速,许多研究已经测量了环境和疾病相关因素对表观遗传年龄的影响。大多数表观遗传时钟的拟合方法是尽量减小预测年龄与观察年龄之间的误差,因此,它们可能无法准确模拟缓和实际年龄与表观遗传年龄之间关系的因素的影响。在这里,我们将使用惩罚回归方法构建的表观遗传时钟与表观遗传起搏器(EPM)的表观遗传衰老进化框架进行了比较,EPM直接将DNA甲基化模拟为随时间变化的表观遗传状态的函数。在模拟中,我们发现表观遗传状态的值受年龄、性别和细胞类型组成等因素的影响。接下来,在一个由以往研究汇总而成的数据集中,我们表明表观遗传状态也受性别和细胞类型的影响。最后,我们在一项关于多溴联苯暴露的研究中证明,表观遗传状态也受毒素的影响。因此,我们发现起搏器为研究影响表观遗传年龄加速的因素提供了一个稳健的框架,而这些因素的影响可能会被基于线性回归模型的传统时钟所掩盖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identifying epigenetic aging moderators using the epigenetic pacemaker
Epigenetic clocks are DNA methylation-based chronological age prediction models that are commonly employed to study age-related biology. The difference between the predicted and observed age is often interpreted as a form of biological age acceleration, and many studies have measured the impact of environmental and disease-associated factors on epigenetic age. Most epigenetic clocks are fit using approaches that minimize the error between the predicted and observed chronological age, and as a result, they may not accurately model the impact of factors that moderate the relationship between the actual and epigenetic age. Here, we compare epigenetic clocks that are constructed using penalized regression methods to an evolutionary framework of epigenetic aging with the epigenetic pacemaker (EPM), which directly models DNA methylation as a function of a time-dependent epigenetic state. In simulations, we show that the value of the epigenetic state is impacted by factors such as age, sex, and cell-type composition. Next, in a dataset aggregated from previous studies, we show that the epigenetic state is also moderated by sex and the cell type. Finally, we demonstrate that the epigenetic state is also moderated by toxins in a study on polybrominated biphenyl exposure. Thus, we find that the pacemaker provides a robust framework for the study of factors that impact epigenetic age acceleration and that the effect of these factors may be obscured in traditional clocks based on linear regression models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quantification of muscle fiber malformations using edge detection to investigate chronic muscle pressure ulcers. Computational identification and characterization of chitinase 1 and chitinase 2 from neotropical isolates of Beauveria bassiana. DCMA: faster protein backbone dihedral angle prediction using a dilated convolutional attention-based neural network. Identification of novel drug targets for Helicobacter pylori: structure-based virtual screening of potential inhibitors against DAH7PS protein involved in the shikimate pathway. Editorial: Women in bioinformatics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1