乔伊斯《亡灵》中的误读、自我嘲弄和捏造的决心

Brian Richardson
{"title":"乔伊斯《亡灵》中的误读、自我嘲弄和捏造的决心","authors":"Brian Richardson","doi":"10.1353/pan.2024.a916699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Joyce’s “The Dead” contains a number of partial and misleading narratives related in an unexpected manner, and as such greatly rewards a narrative- centered analysis. Misinterpretation is general in this work; one might argue that the text is primarily a record of Gabriel’s repeated misinterpretations of the people and narratives around him. This is true of the women he interacts with; most egregiously, he does not even imagine that his wife has a story independent of her life with him. An attention to narrative and interpretation in turn leads to a different reading of the ending of the text. Far from being a definitive epiphany that finally reveals the bitter truth about himself and his marriage, Gabriel’s closing convictions are yet additional misinterpretations about his marriage, his situation, and his life, and rather Romantic ones at that, which the reader trained by this text would be wise to question and reject in favor of a more skeptical conclusion. In addition, the kind of third-person narration with a single focalizer for nearly all of the text lends itself to the kind of misleading conclusions which Margot Norris has identified; this strategy reproduces and even re-enacts the text’s larger hermeneutical dramas, as the reader is challenged to see through a rhetoric that naturalizes an ideological perspective that seems untroubled by imperial rule.","PeriodicalId":516166,"journal":{"name":"Partial Answers: Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Misreadings, Self-Misprisions, and Fabricated Resolutions in Joyce’s “The Dead”\",\"authors\":\"Brian Richardson\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/pan.2024.a916699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Joyce’s “The Dead” contains a number of partial and misleading narratives related in an unexpected manner, and as such greatly rewards a narrative- centered analysis. Misinterpretation is general in this work; one might argue that the text is primarily a record of Gabriel’s repeated misinterpretations of the people and narratives around him. This is true of the women he interacts with; most egregiously, he does not even imagine that his wife has a story independent of her life with him. An attention to narrative and interpretation in turn leads to a different reading of the ending of the text. Far from being a definitive epiphany that finally reveals the bitter truth about himself and his marriage, Gabriel’s closing convictions are yet additional misinterpretations about his marriage, his situation, and his life, and rather Romantic ones at that, which the reader trained by this text would be wise to question and reject in favor of a more skeptical conclusion. In addition, the kind of third-person narration with a single focalizer for nearly all of the text lends itself to the kind of misleading conclusions which Margot Norris has identified; this strategy reproduces and even re-enacts the text’s larger hermeneutical dramas, as the reader is challenged to see through a rhetoric that naturalizes an ideological perspective that seems untroubled by imperial rule.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Partial Answers: Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Partial Answers: Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/pan.2024.a916699\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Partial Answers: Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/pan.2024.a916699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:乔伊斯的《死者》中包含了许多片面的、误导性的叙述,这些叙述以出人意料的方式联系在一起,因此非常值得以叙述为中心进行分析。在这部作品中,误读是普遍现象;可以说,文本主要记录了加布里埃尔对周围的人和叙述的反复误读。与他交往的女性也是如此;最令人震惊的是,他甚至无法想象他的妻子在与他的生活之外还有一个独立的故事。对叙事和阐释的关注反过来又会导致对文本结尾的不同解读。加布里埃尔最后的信念远非最终揭示他自己和他的婚姻的痛苦真相的决定性顿悟,而是对他的婚姻、他的处境和他的生活的又一次误读,而且是相当浪漫的误读。此外,该书采用第三人称叙事,几乎全文都只有一个焦点人物,这就容易产生玛格特-诺里斯(Margot Norris)所指出的那种误导性结论;这种策略再现甚至重演了文本中更大的诠释学戏剧,因为读者面临的挑战是如何看穿一种修辞,这种修辞将似乎不受帝国统治困扰的意识形态观点自然化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Misreadings, Self-Misprisions, and Fabricated Resolutions in Joyce’s “The Dead”
Abstract:Joyce’s “The Dead” contains a number of partial and misleading narratives related in an unexpected manner, and as such greatly rewards a narrative- centered analysis. Misinterpretation is general in this work; one might argue that the text is primarily a record of Gabriel’s repeated misinterpretations of the people and narratives around him. This is true of the women he interacts with; most egregiously, he does not even imagine that his wife has a story independent of her life with him. An attention to narrative and interpretation in turn leads to a different reading of the ending of the text. Far from being a definitive epiphany that finally reveals the bitter truth about himself and his marriage, Gabriel’s closing convictions are yet additional misinterpretations about his marriage, his situation, and his life, and rather Romantic ones at that, which the reader trained by this text would be wise to question and reject in favor of a more skeptical conclusion. In addition, the kind of third-person narration with a single focalizer for nearly all of the text lends itself to the kind of misleading conclusions which Margot Norris has identified; this strategy reproduces and even re-enacts the text’s larger hermeneutical dramas, as the reader is challenged to see through a rhetoric that naturalizes an ideological perspective that seems untroubled by imperial rule.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Creativity — Narrativity — Fictionality: A Critical Genealogy Toni Morrison and the Natural World: An Ecology of Color by Anissa Janine Wardi (review) Dispersing the Devil’s Stench: Shifting Perceptions of Sulfuric Miasma in Early Modern English Literatures The Mirror and the Icon: A Theological Perspective on Nabokov’s Pale Fire Creative Work Ethic and Autofiction: Sheila Heti’s How Should a Person Be?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1