美国 2021-2022 年 "我们能做到 "运动与 COVID-19 增效剂摄入量之间的关系

Benjamin Denison MA, PhD , Morgane Bennett MPH, DrPH , Jae-Eun Kim MA, PhD , Heather Dahlen MA, PhD , Christopher Williams MA, PhD , Joseph N. Luchman PhD , Elissa C. Kranzler MSEd, MA, PhD , Sarah Trigger MPH , Tyler Nighbor PhD , Michael C. Marshall PhD , Leah Hoffman MPH
{"title":"美国 2021-2022 年 \"我们能做到 \"运动与 COVID-19 增效剂摄入量之间的关系","authors":"Benjamin Denison MA, PhD ,&nbsp;Morgane Bennett MPH, DrPH ,&nbsp;Jae-Eun Kim MA, PhD ,&nbsp;Heather Dahlen MA, PhD ,&nbsp;Christopher Williams MA, PhD ,&nbsp;Joseph N. Luchman PhD ,&nbsp;Elissa C. Kranzler MSEd, MA, PhD ,&nbsp;Sarah Trigger MPH ,&nbsp;Tyler Nighbor PhD ,&nbsp;Michael C. Marshall PhD ,&nbsp;Leah Hoffman MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.focus.2024.100183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Monovalent COVID-19 boosters lower the risk of COVID-19 disease, infection, hospitalization, and death. This study examined associations between exposure to a booster public education campaign (the booster campaign) and the increases in booster uptake and reduced length of time until booster uptake among U.S. adults.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data included a national survey panel of U.S. adults and booster campaign paid media (i.e., digital impressions and TV gross rating points) from September 2021 to May 2022. Multilevel logistic regression models examined the association between exposure to the booster campaign and the likelihood of booster uptake. A Cox proportional hazard model evaluated the association between the booster campaign and booster uptake timing. Interaction terms between the booster campaign media variables and first-dose COVID-19 vaccine date examined differential effects of the booster campaign based on when individuals received their first dose.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Interactions between first-dose vaccination date and the booster campaign were statistically significant for cumulative digital impressions (ß=4.75e-08; 95% CIs=5.93e-09, 8.90e-08) and TV gross rating points (ß = 4.62e-05; 95% CIs=5.09e-06, 8.73e-05), suggesting that booster uptake was strongest among those who received their first-dose COVID-19 vaccine later. Booster campaign cumulative digital impressions and TV gross rating points were associated with accelerated booster uptake among those with later first-dose vaccination dates (digital: ß=9.98e-08; 95% CIs=2.70e-08, 1.73e-07; TV: ß=0.0001; 95% CIs=2.80e-05, 0.0002), relative to those with earlier first-dose vaccination dates.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The booster campaign may have increased monovalent booster uptake and reduced how long individuals waited until getting their booster. Public education campaigns show promise in stemming the tide of pandemic fatigue and increasing booster confidence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72142,"journal":{"name":"AJPM focus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065424000026/pdfft?md5=7073849c4f8cc3d317fc0942c5e569d0&pid=1-s2.0-S2773065424000026-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between the “We Can Do This” Campaign and COVID-19 Booster Uptake, U.S., 2021–2022\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Denison MA, PhD ,&nbsp;Morgane Bennett MPH, DrPH ,&nbsp;Jae-Eun Kim MA, PhD ,&nbsp;Heather Dahlen MA, PhD ,&nbsp;Christopher Williams MA, PhD ,&nbsp;Joseph N. Luchman PhD ,&nbsp;Elissa C. Kranzler MSEd, MA, PhD ,&nbsp;Sarah Trigger MPH ,&nbsp;Tyler Nighbor PhD ,&nbsp;Michael C. Marshall PhD ,&nbsp;Leah Hoffman MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.focus.2024.100183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Monovalent COVID-19 boosters lower the risk of COVID-19 disease, infection, hospitalization, and death. This study examined associations between exposure to a booster public education campaign (the booster campaign) and the increases in booster uptake and reduced length of time until booster uptake among U.S. adults.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data included a national survey panel of U.S. adults and booster campaign paid media (i.e., digital impressions and TV gross rating points) from September 2021 to May 2022. Multilevel logistic regression models examined the association between exposure to the booster campaign and the likelihood of booster uptake. A Cox proportional hazard model evaluated the association between the booster campaign and booster uptake timing. Interaction terms between the booster campaign media variables and first-dose COVID-19 vaccine date examined differential effects of the booster campaign based on when individuals received their first dose.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Interactions between first-dose vaccination date and the booster campaign were statistically significant for cumulative digital impressions (ß=4.75e-08; 95% CIs=5.93e-09, 8.90e-08) and TV gross rating points (ß = 4.62e-05; 95% CIs=5.09e-06, 8.73e-05), suggesting that booster uptake was strongest among those who received their first-dose COVID-19 vaccine later. Booster campaign cumulative digital impressions and TV gross rating points were associated with accelerated booster uptake among those with later first-dose vaccination dates (digital: ß=9.98e-08; 95% CIs=2.70e-08, 1.73e-07; TV: ß=0.0001; 95% CIs=2.80e-05, 0.0002), relative to those with earlier first-dose vaccination dates.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The booster campaign may have increased monovalent booster uptake and reduced how long individuals waited until getting their booster. Public education campaigns show promise in stemming the tide of pandemic fatigue and increasing booster confidence.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJPM focus\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065424000026/pdfft?md5=7073849c4f8cc3d317fc0942c5e569d0&pid=1-s2.0-S2773065424000026-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJPM focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065424000026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJPM focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065424000026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:一价 COVID-19 强化剂可降低 COVID-19 疾病、感染、住院和死亡的风险。本研究考察了美国成年人接受增强剂公共教育活动(增强剂活动)与增强剂接受率增加和接受增强剂时间缩短之间的关系。数据包括 2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 5 月期间的美国成年人全国调查小组和增强剂活动付费媒体(即数字印象和电视总收视点数)。多层次逻辑回归模型检验了加强型宣传活动曝光与加强型宣传活动接受可能性之间的关联。Cox 比例危险模型评估了加强型宣传活动与接受加强型宣传活动时间之间的关系。加强接种活动的媒体变量与第一剂 COVID-19 疫苗接种日期之间的交互项检验了加强接种活动根据接种第一剂疫苗的时间所产生的不同影响。结果在累积数字印象方面,第一剂疫苗接种日期与加强接种活动之间的交互作用具有统计学意义(ß=4.75e-08;95% CIs=5.93e-09,8.90e-08)和电视总收视率点数(ß=4.62e-05;95% CIs=5.09e-06,8.73e-05)之间的交互作用具有统计学意义,这表明在较晚接种第一剂 COVID-19 疫苗的人群中,加强接种率最高。在第一剂疫苗接种日期较晚的人群中,加强接种活动的累计数字印象和电视总收视率点数与加强接种率加速相关(数字印象和电视总收视率点数分别为ß=9.98e-08; 95% CIs=2.70e-08, 1.73e-07; TV:结论 强化接种活动可能提高了单价疫苗的接种率,并缩短了接种时间。公众教育活动有望阻止大流行疲劳症的蔓延并增强对加强接种的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association Between the “We Can Do This” Campaign and COVID-19 Booster Uptake, U.S., 2021–2022

Introduction

Monovalent COVID-19 boosters lower the risk of COVID-19 disease, infection, hospitalization, and death. This study examined associations between exposure to a booster public education campaign (the booster campaign) and the increases in booster uptake and reduced length of time until booster uptake among U.S. adults.

Methods

Data included a national survey panel of U.S. adults and booster campaign paid media (i.e., digital impressions and TV gross rating points) from September 2021 to May 2022. Multilevel logistic regression models examined the association between exposure to the booster campaign and the likelihood of booster uptake. A Cox proportional hazard model evaluated the association between the booster campaign and booster uptake timing. Interaction terms between the booster campaign media variables and first-dose COVID-19 vaccine date examined differential effects of the booster campaign based on when individuals received their first dose.

Results

Interactions between first-dose vaccination date and the booster campaign were statistically significant for cumulative digital impressions (ß=4.75e-08; 95% CIs=5.93e-09, 8.90e-08) and TV gross rating points (ß = 4.62e-05; 95% CIs=5.09e-06, 8.73e-05), suggesting that booster uptake was strongest among those who received their first-dose COVID-19 vaccine later. Booster campaign cumulative digital impressions and TV gross rating points were associated with accelerated booster uptake among those with later first-dose vaccination dates (digital: ß=9.98e-08; 95% CIs=2.70e-08, 1.73e-07; TV: ß=0.0001; 95% CIs=2.80e-05, 0.0002), relative to those with earlier first-dose vaccination dates.

Conclusions

The booster campaign may have increased monovalent booster uptake and reduced how long individuals waited until getting their booster. Public education campaigns show promise in stemming the tide of pandemic fatigue and increasing booster confidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AJPM focus
AJPM focus Health, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board and Journal Information Work-Related Factors Associated With Psychological Distress Among Grocery Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic Lifestyle Differences in the Metabolic Comorbidity Score of Adult Population From South Asian Countries: A Cross-Sectional Study Corrigendum: Associations of Historical Redlining With BMI and Waist Circumference in Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Physicians’ Self-Reported Knowledge and Behaviors Related to Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain and Diagnosing Opioid Use Disorder, DocStyles, 2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1