租赁失去高度,所有权起飞:新租赁标准的实际影响

Bin Li, M. Venkatachalam
{"title":"租赁失去高度,所有权起飞:新租赁标准的实际影响","authors":"Bin Li, M. Venkatachalam","doi":"10.2308/tar-2022-0290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper evaluates the real effects of the new lease standard, ASC 842, on firms’ investment and operational outcomes. Using a sample of airline companies, we find that, subsequent to the promulgation of ASC 842 (2016–2018), public airlines reduce operating lease usage by about seven to ten percentage points relative to private airlines. The reduced lease usage is replaced by increased ownership, suggesting an equilibrium shift in firms’ investment due to changes in the cost-benefit tradeoffs associated with the operating lease classification. We also find evidence that the decline in lease usage hinders public airlines’ operational flexibility, as we observe more idle capacity in flights post-ASC 842. Facing excess capacity, public airlines seem to deploy their aircraft to shorter flying routes, raising the possibility of more wear and tear on the fleet. Overall, our evidence suggests that the new lease standard has intended and unintended real effects.\n Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text.\n JEL Classifications: M41; M48; D22; D24; D25; E22; G38.","PeriodicalId":503285,"journal":{"name":"The Accounting Review","volume":"7 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leasing Loses Altitude While Ownership Takes Off: Real Effects of the New Lease Standard\",\"authors\":\"Bin Li, M. Venkatachalam\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/tar-2022-0290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper evaluates the real effects of the new lease standard, ASC 842, on firms’ investment and operational outcomes. Using a sample of airline companies, we find that, subsequent to the promulgation of ASC 842 (2016–2018), public airlines reduce operating lease usage by about seven to ten percentage points relative to private airlines. The reduced lease usage is replaced by increased ownership, suggesting an equilibrium shift in firms’ investment due to changes in the cost-benefit tradeoffs associated with the operating lease classification. We also find evidence that the decline in lease usage hinders public airlines’ operational flexibility, as we observe more idle capacity in flights post-ASC 842. Facing excess capacity, public airlines seem to deploy their aircraft to shorter flying routes, raising the possibility of more wear and tear on the fleet. Overall, our evidence suggests that the new lease standard has intended and unintended real effects.\\n Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text.\\n JEL Classifications: M41; M48; D22; D24; D25; E22; G38.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Accounting Review\",\"volume\":\"7 13\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Accounting Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2022-0290\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2022-0290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文评估了新租赁标准 ASC 842 对企业投资和运营结果的实际影响。通过对航空公司的抽样调查,我们发现在 ASC 842 颁布后(2016-2018 年),公营航空公司的经营租赁使用率相对于私营航空公司减少了约 7 到 10 个百分点。租赁使用量的减少被所有权的增加所取代,这表明由于与经营租赁分类相关的成本效益权衡发生了变化,公司的投资发生了均衡变化。我们还发现有证据表明,租赁使用率的下降阻碍了公共航空公司的运营灵活性,因为我们观察到《美国会计准则第 842 号》实施后航班的闲置运力增加了。面对过剩的运力,公共航空公司似乎将飞机部署到了更短的航线上,从而增加了机队损耗的可能性。总体而言,我们的证据表明,新租赁标准产生了预期和非预期的实际效果。数据可用性:数据可从文中引用的公共来源获得。JEL Classifications:M41;M48;D22;D24;D25;E22;G38。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Leasing Loses Altitude While Ownership Takes Off: Real Effects of the New Lease Standard
This paper evaluates the real effects of the new lease standard, ASC 842, on firms’ investment and operational outcomes. Using a sample of airline companies, we find that, subsequent to the promulgation of ASC 842 (2016–2018), public airlines reduce operating lease usage by about seven to ten percentage points relative to private airlines. The reduced lease usage is replaced by increased ownership, suggesting an equilibrium shift in firms’ investment due to changes in the cost-benefit tradeoffs associated with the operating lease classification. We also find evidence that the decline in lease usage hinders public airlines’ operational flexibility, as we observe more idle capacity in flights post-ASC 842. Facing excess capacity, public airlines seem to deploy their aircraft to shorter flying routes, raising the possibility of more wear and tear on the fleet. Overall, our evidence suggests that the new lease standard has intended and unintended real effects. Data Availability: Data are available from the public sources cited in the text. JEL Classifications: M41; M48; D22; D24; D25; E22; G38.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Strategic Disclosure Incentives in a Multisegment Firm Is Customers’ Financial Reporting Quality Associated with Suppliers’ Decision to Contract? Classifying Forecasts The Effect of Financial Audits on Governance Practices: Evidence from the Nonprofit Sector Market Access and Retail Investment Performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1