2 型糖尿病患者的分娩时间对围产期结果的影响

IF 1 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes epidemiology and management Pub Date : 2024-01-09 DOI:10.1016/j.deman.2024.100196
Katarina Q. Watson , Akshaya Kannan , Nasim C. Sobhani
{"title":"2 型糖尿病患者的分娩时间对围产期结果的影响","authors":"Katarina Q. Watson ,&nbsp;Akshaya Kannan ,&nbsp;Nasim C. Sobhani","doi":"10.1016/j.deman.2024.100196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To compare obstetric and neonatal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who had scheduled delivery at full term (≥ 39 0/7 weeks) compared to early term (37 0/7 – 38 6/7 weeks) for T2DM indications.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective cohort study that included all singletons with T2DM with a scheduled delivery at a single tertiary care center between January 2008 and March 2022. Outcomes were compared using Fisher's exact test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>107 singleton pregnancies were included. There was no significant difference in primary cesarean delivery between the two groups. The early term group had significantly higher rates of NICU admission compared to the term group (52% vs 32%, <em>p</em> = 0.05, OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.0–5.0), a finding that remained statistically significant on adjusted analysis (adjusted OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.04–7.58).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In singleton pregnancies undergoing scheduled delivery for T2DM-specific indications, early term deliveries were associated with significantly increased odds of NICU admission when compared to term deliveries, even after adjusting for surrogate markers of glycemic control. These findings suggest that early term delivery contributes to risk of NICU admission, rather than the indication for delivery itself. These findings should be replicated in a larger cohort.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72796,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100196"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666970624000015/pdfft?md5=54b12b6dc4f2e8f16add805a991de305&pid=1-s2.0-S2666970624000015-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of timing of delivery for type 2 diabetes on perinatal outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Katarina Q. Watson ,&nbsp;Akshaya Kannan ,&nbsp;Nasim C. Sobhani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.deman.2024.100196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To compare obstetric and neonatal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who had scheduled delivery at full term (≥ 39 0/7 weeks) compared to early term (37 0/7 – 38 6/7 weeks) for T2DM indications.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective cohort study that included all singletons with T2DM with a scheduled delivery at a single tertiary care center between January 2008 and March 2022. Outcomes were compared using Fisher's exact test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>107 singleton pregnancies were included. There was no significant difference in primary cesarean delivery between the two groups. The early term group had significantly higher rates of NICU admission compared to the term group (52% vs 32%, <em>p</em> = 0.05, OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.0–5.0), a finding that remained statistically significant on adjusted analysis (adjusted OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.04–7.58).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In singleton pregnancies undergoing scheduled delivery for T2DM-specific indications, early term deliveries were associated with significantly increased odds of NICU admission when compared to term deliveries, even after adjusting for surrogate markers of glycemic control. These findings suggest that early term delivery contributes to risk of NICU admission, rather than the indication for delivery itself. These findings should be replicated in a larger cohort.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes epidemiology and management\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666970624000015/pdfft?md5=54b12b6dc4f2e8f16add805a991de305&pid=1-s2.0-S2666970624000015-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes epidemiology and management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666970624000015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666970624000015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较因T2DM适应症而在足月(≥ 39 0/7周)和早产(37 0/7 - 38 6/7周)时预定分娩的2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的产科和新生儿结局。方法这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了2008年1月至2022年3月期间在一家三级医疗中心预定分娩的所有T2DM单胎患者。结果共纳入 107 例单胎妊娠。两组孕妇的初次剖宫产率无明显差异。结论在因T2DM特异性指征而接受预产期分娩的单胎妊娠中,即使调整了血糖控制的替代指标,与足月分娩相比,早产儿进入新生儿重症监护室的几率也明显增加。这些研究结果表明,早产会导致新生儿重症监护室入院风险,而不是分娩指征本身。这些研究结果应在更大的队列中得到重复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of timing of delivery for type 2 diabetes on perinatal outcomes

Aims

To compare obstetric and neonatal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who had scheduled delivery at full term (≥ 39 0/7 weeks) compared to early term (37 0/7 – 38 6/7 weeks) for T2DM indications.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study that included all singletons with T2DM with a scheduled delivery at a single tertiary care center between January 2008 and March 2022. Outcomes were compared using Fisher's exact test.

Results

107 singleton pregnancies were included. There was no significant difference in primary cesarean delivery between the two groups. The early term group had significantly higher rates of NICU admission compared to the term group (52% vs 32%, p = 0.05, OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.0–5.0), a finding that remained statistically significant on adjusted analysis (adjusted OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.04–7.58).

Conclusions

In singleton pregnancies undergoing scheduled delivery for T2DM-specific indications, early term deliveries were associated with significantly increased odds of NICU admission when compared to term deliveries, even after adjusting for surrogate markers of glycemic control. These findings suggest that early term delivery contributes to risk of NICU admission, rather than the indication for delivery itself. These findings should be replicated in a larger cohort.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes epidemiology and management
Diabetes epidemiology and management Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 days
期刊最新文献
Innovative immunotherapies and emerging treatments in type 1 diabetes management Autoantibodies in type 1 diabetes: Prevalence and clinical profiles Reply to increase in diabetic deaths during COVID-19 pandemic. Some comments High prevalence of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes, and identification of associated factors, in high-risk adults in Vietnam: A cross-sectional study editorial board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1