确定伊斯坦布尔证券交易所可持续性指数中公司的财务业绩:将多标准决策方法与模拟相结合

IF 6.9 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Financial Innovation Pub Date : 2024-01-15 DOI:10.1186/s40854-023-00512-3
Ahmet Kaya, Dragan Pamucar, Hasan Emin Gürler, Mehmet Ozcalici
{"title":"确定伊斯坦布尔证券交易所可持续性指数中公司的财务业绩:将多标准决策方法与模拟相结合","authors":"Ahmet Kaya, Dragan Pamucar, Hasan Emin Gürler, Mehmet Ozcalici","doi":"10.1186/s40854-023-00512-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regardless of the industry in which a company operates, evaluating corporate performance is one of the most critical and vital processes; the most essential and prominent performance evaluation is related to financial performance. Appropriate performance analysis is complex and critical for decision-makers in different financial performance factors; thus, a methodological framework is needed to solve such complex decision problems. Therefore, this research aims to rank the companies included in the sustainability index (excluding banks) in Turkey by considering their financial performance. The criteria weights were determined using the full consistency method (FUCOM) by considering the evaluations of four experts. The firms were ranked using nine multi-criteria decision-making methods. The consensus among the nine rankings was ensured with the Copeland technique. The decision matrix includes financial ratios and the stock market performance of the firms; 100,000 FUCOM weights were created with random evaluations to validate the results. The results indicate that the most crucial criterion is the current ratio by considering expert evaluations. Weight simulation indicates that alternative 16 (alternative 21) is superior (inferior) to the other alternatives, even though the weights are determined with random evaluations. Ranking with expert evaluations is similar to the mean of the weight simulation results. The results demonstrate that the proposed framework can be performed as a basis for financial performance ranking.","PeriodicalId":37175,"journal":{"name":"Financial Innovation","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determining the financial performance of the firms in the Borsa Istanbul sustainability index: integrating multi criteria decision making methods with simulation\",\"authors\":\"Ahmet Kaya, Dragan Pamucar, Hasan Emin Gürler, Mehmet Ozcalici\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40854-023-00512-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Regardless of the industry in which a company operates, evaluating corporate performance is one of the most critical and vital processes; the most essential and prominent performance evaluation is related to financial performance. Appropriate performance analysis is complex and critical for decision-makers in different financial performance factors; thus, a methodological framework is needed to solve such complex decision problems. Therefore, this research aims to rank the companies included in the sustainability index (excluding banks) in Turkey by considering their financial performance. The criteria weights were determined using the full consistency method (FUCOM) by considering the evaluations of four experts. The firms were ranked using nine multi-criteria decision-making methods. The consensus among the nine rankings was ensured with the Copeland technique. The decision matrix includes financial ratios and the stock market performance of the firms; 100,000 FUCOM weights were created with random evaluations to validate the results. The results indicate that the most crucial criterion is the current ratio by considering expert evaluations. Weight simulation indicates that alternative 16 (alternative 21) is superior (inferior) to the other alternatives, even though the weights are determined with random evaluations. Ranking with expert evaluations is similar to the mean of the weight simulation results. The results demonstrate that the proposed framework can be performed as a basis for financial performance ranking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Financial Innovation\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Financial Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00512-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00512-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无论公司在哪个行业经营,评估公司业绩都是最关键、最重要的过程之一;最基本、最突出的业绩评估与财务业绩有关。对于不同财务绩效因素的决策者来说,适当的绩效分析既复杂又关键;因此,需要一个方法框架来解决此类复杂的决策问题。因此,本研究旨在通过考虑土耳其可持续发展指数(不包括银行)中包含的公司的财务业绩,对这些公司进行排名。通过考虑四位专家的评价,采用完全一致法(FUCOM)确定了标准权重。采用九种多标准决策方法对企业进行了排名。采用科普兰技术确保了九个排名之间的一致性。决策矩阵包括企业的财务比率和股票市场表现;为验证结果,创建了 100,000 个随机评价的 FUCOM 权重。结果表明,考虑到专家评价,最关键的标准是流动比率。权重模拟表明,备选方案 16(备选方案 21)优于(劣于)其他备选方案,尽管权重是通过随机评价确定的。利用专家评价进行的排序与权重模拟结果的平均值相似。结果表明,建议的框架可以作为财务业绩排名的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Determining the financial performance of the firms in the Borsa Istanbul sustainability index: integrating multi criteria decision making methods with simulation
Regardless of the industry in which a company operates, evaluating corporate performance is one of the most critical and vital processes; the most essential and prominent performance evaluation is related to financial performance. Appropriate performance analysis is complex and critical for decision-makers in different financial performance factors; thus, a methodological framework is needed to solve such complex decision problems. Therefore, this research aims to rank the companies included in the sustainability index (excluding banks) in Turkey by considering their financial performance. The criteria weights were determined using the full consistency method (FUCOM) by considering the evaluations of four experts. The firms were ranked using nine multi-criteria decision-making methods. The consensus among the nine rankings was ensured with the Copeland technique. The decision matrix includes financial ratios and the stock market performance of the firms; 100,000 FUCOM weights were created with random evaluations to validate the results. The results indicate that the most crucial criterion is the current ratio by considering expert evaluations. Weight simulation indicates that alternative 16 (alternative 21) is superior (inferior) to the other alternatives, even though the weights are determined with random evaluations. Ranking with expert evaluations is similar to the mean of the weight simulation results. The results demonstrate that the proposed framework can be performed as a basis for financial performance ranking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Financial Innovation
Financial Innovation Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
11.90%
发文量
95
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Financial Innovation (FIN), a Springer OA journal sponsored by Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, serves as a global academic platform for sharing research findings in all aspects of financial innovation during the electronic business era. It facilitates interactions among researchers, policymakers, and practitioners, focusing on new financial instruments, technologies, markets, and institutions. Emphasizing emerging financial products enabled by disruptive technologies, FIN publishes high-quality academic and practical papers. The journal is peer-reviewed, indexed in SSCI, Scopus, Google Scholar, CNKI, CQVIP, and more.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning in business and finance: a literature review and research opportunities Predictive crypto-asset automated market maker architecture for decentralized finance using deep reinforcement learning Cryptocurrencies under climate shocks: a dynamic network analysis of extreme risk spillovers Exploring the coherency and predictability between the stocks of artificial intelligence and energy corporations From CFOs to crypto: exploratory study unraveling factors in corporate adoption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1