{"title":"持续淋巴细胞减少的败血症患者的特征和临床预后","authors":"Juanjuan Jing, Yushan Wei, Xue Dong, Dandan Li, Chenyang Zhang, Zhiyao Fang, Jia Wang, Xianyao Wan","doi":"10.1177/08850666241226877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Septic patients with persistent lymphopenia may be in an immunosuppressed state. Therefore, we evaluated and compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes of septic patients with persistent lymphopenia (≥2d) and those with nonpersistent lymphopenia. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cohort study was designed. A total of 1306 patients with sepsis who were attended to the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University from March 2016 to August 2022 were included. The primary clinical outcome was 90d mortality. The secondary clinical outcomes were the length of stay, hospital mortality, 28d mortality, the incidence of secondary infection, and differences in clinical characteristics. <b>Results:</b> Among 1306 patients with sepsis, 913 (69.9%) patients developed persistent lymphopenia. Compared with patients with nonpersistent lymphopenia, patients with persistent lymphocytopenia were admitted to intensive care unit (75.7% vs 52.7%, <i>P </i><<i> </i>.05), treated with mechanical ventilation (67.6% vs 39.2%, <i>P </i>< .05), positive rate of microbial culture pathogens (86.7% vs 71.2%, <i>P </i><<i> </i>.05), SOFA [8.0 (6.0-10.0) vs 6.0 (4.0-8.0), <i>P </i>< .05], length of stay [17.0d (12.0-27.0) vs 13.0d (10.0-21.0), <i>P </i>< .05], hospital mortality (37.7% vs 24.2%, <i>P </i>< .05), 28d mortality (38.0% vs 22.9%, <i>P </i>< .05), and 90d mortality (51.2% vs 31.3%, <i>P </i>< .05) were higher. As the duration of lymphocytopenia increased, so did the mortality rate in hospital. In addition, the onset time of persistent lymphopenia was not associated with SOFA. But we found that the frequency of persistent lymphopenia during hospitalization was positively associated with SOFA. <b>Conclusion:</b> Septic patients with persistent lymphopenia have higher mortality, worse conditions, increased risk of secondary infection, and poor prognosis regardless of shock.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"733-741"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics and Clinical Prognosis of Septic Patients With Persistent Lymphopenia.\",\"authors\":\"Juanjuan Jing, Yushan Wei, Xue Dong, Dandan Li, Chenyang Zhang, Zhiyao Fang, Jia Wang, Xianyao Wan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08850666241226877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Septic patients with persistent lymphopenia may be in an immunosuppressed state. Therefore, we evaluated and compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes of septic patients with persistent lymphopenia (≥2d) and those with nonpersistent lymphopenia. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cohort study was designed. A total of 1306 patients with sepsis who were attended to the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University from March 2016 to August 2022 were included. The primary clinical outcome was 90d mortality. The secondary clinical outcomes were the length of stay, hospital mortality, 28d mortality, the incidence of secondary infection, and differences in clinical characteristics. <b>Results:</b> Among 1306 patients with sepsis, 913 (69.9%) patients developed persistent lymphopenia. Compared with patients with nonpersistent lymphopenia, patients with persistent lymphocytopenia were admitted to intensive care unit (75.7% vs 52.7%, <i>P </i><<i> </i>.05), treated with mechanical ventilation (67.6% vs 39.2%, <i>P </i>< .05), positive rate of microbial culture pathogens (86.7% vs 71.2%, <i>P </i><<i> </i>.05), SOFA [8.0 (6.0-10.0) vs 6.0 (4.0-8.0), <i>P </i>< .05], length of stay [17.0d (12.0-27.0) vs 13.0d (10.0-21.0), <i>P </i>< .05], hospital mortality (37.7% vs 24.2%, <i>P </i>< .05), 28d mortality (38.0% vs 22.9%, <i>P </i>< .05), and 90d mortality (51.2% vs 31.3%, <i>P </i>< .05) were higher. As the duration of lymphocytopenia increased, so did the mortality rate in hospital. In addition, the onset time of persistent lymphopenia was not associated with SOFA. But we found that the frequency of persistent lymphopenia during hospitalization was positively associated with SOFA. <b>Conclusion:</b> Septic patients with persistent lymphopenia have higher mortality, worse conditions, increased risk of secondary infection, and poor prognosis regardless of shock.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"733-741\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241226877\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241226877","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:持续淋巴细胞减少的脓毒症患者可能处于免疫抑制状态。因此,我们评估并比较了持续性淋巴细胞减少症(≥2d)和非持续性淋巴细胞减少症败血症患者的临床特征和预后。研究方法设计了一项回顾性队列研究。共纳入大连医科大学附属第一医院 2016 年 3 月至 2022 年 8 月期间收治的 1306 例败血症患者。主要临床结果为90天死亡率。次要临床结局为住院时间、住院死亡率、28天死亡率、继发感染发生率以及临床特征差异。研究结果在 1306 名败血症患者中,有 913 名(69.9%)患者出现持续性淋巴细胞减少症。与非持续性淋巴细胞减少症患者相比,持续性淋巴细胞减少症患者入住重症监护室(75.7% vs 52.7%,P .05),接受机械通气治疗(67.6% vs 39.2%,P .05),SOFA [8.0 (6.0-10.0) vs 6.0 (4.0-8.0),P P P P P 结论:无论休克与否,持续淋巴细胞减少的败血症患者死亡率较高,病情恶化,继发感染风险增加,预后较差。
Characteristics and Clinical Prognosis of Septic Patients With Persistent Lymphopenia.
Background: Septic patients with persistent lymphopenia may be in an immunosuppressed state. Therefore, we evaluated and compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes of septic patients with persistent lymphopenia (≥2d) and those with nonpersistent lymphopenia. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was designed. A total of 1306 patients with sepsis who were attended to the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University from March 2016 to August 2022 were included. The primary clinical outcome was 90d mortality. The secondary clinical outcomes were the length of stay, hospital mortality, 28d mortality, the incidence of secondary infection, and differences in clinical characteristics. Results: Among 1306 patients with sepsis, 913 (69.9%) patients developed persistent lymphopenia. Compared with patients with nonpersistent lymphopenia, patients with persistent lymphocytopenia were admitted to intensive care unit (75.7% vs 52.7%, P <.05), treated with mechanical ventilation (67.6% vs 39.2%, P < .05), positive rate of microbial culture pathogens (86.7% vs 71.2%, P <.05), SOFA [8.0 (6.0-10.0) vs 6.0 (4.0-8.0), P < .05], length of stay [17.0d (12.0-27.0) vs 13.0d (10.0-21.0), P < .05], hospital mortality (37.7% vs 24.2%, P < .05), 28d mortality (38.0% vs 22.9%, P < .05), and 90d mortality (51.2% vs 31.3%, P < .05) were higher. As the duration of lymphocytopenia increased, so did the mortality rate in hospital. In addition, the onset time of persistent lymphopenia was not associated with SOFA. But we found that the frequency of persistent lymphopenia during hospitalization was positively associated with SOFA. Conclusion: Septic patients with persistent lymphopenia have higher mortality, worse conditions, increased risk of secondary infection, and poor prognosis regardless of shock.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.