{"title":"使用自体外周血单核细胞治疗外周动脉疾病的穴位移植与非穴位移植。","authors":"Wenjing Guo, Ling Pan, Ruiyu Yang, Jiali Sun, Qinglin Hu, Pingping Huang","doi":"10.1097/BS9.0000000000000175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Numerous studies have discussed the therapeutic outcomes of using cell therapy or acupuncture to treat peripheral artery disease (PAD). However, there are no long-term studies on the safety and efficacy of transplanting peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNCs) via acupoints to treat PAD. We first reviewed the short-term and long-term clinical results of PAD patients treated with PBMNCs through intramuscular non-acupoint transplantation (control group; n = 45) or intramuscular acupoint transplantation (acupoint group; n = 45) at a single university hospital general medical center between December 2002 and September 2022. Pain intensity (assessed with the verbal rating scale [VRS] score) in the acupoint group was considerably lower than that in the control group at month 1 (mean ± standard deviation [SD]: 1.29 ± 0.96 vs 1.76 ± 0.82; <i>P</i> = 0.016) and month 3 (mean ± SD: 1.27 ± 0.90 vs 1.61 ± 0.86; <i>P</i> = 0.042). We observed significant improvement of VRS score (<i>P</i> < .001 for all) and ankle-brachial index (ABI; <i>P</i> < .001 for all) from baseline in both groups at months 1, 3, 6, 12, 36, and 60. The 10-year cumulative rate of major amputation-free survival (MAFS) was higher in the acupoint group as compared to the control group (81.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 71.3%-94.1% vs 78.5%, 95% CI: 66.7%-92.3%; <i>P</i> = 0.768). Compared with the routine injection method, intramuscular transplantation of PBMNCs via selected acupoints could significantly decrease the short-term pain intensity in patients with PAD, which remains an option for consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":67343,"journal":{"name":"血液科学(英文)","volume":"6 1","pages":"e00175"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10789451/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acupoint transplantation versus non-acupoint transplantation using autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells in treating peripheral arterial disease.\",\"authors\":\"Wenjing Guo, Ling Pan, Ruiyu Yang, Jiali Sun, Qinglin Hu, Pingping Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BS9.0000000000000175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Numerous studies have discussed the therapeutic outcomes of using cell therapy or acupuncture to treat peripheral artery disease (PAD). However, there are no long-term studies on the safety and efficacy of transplanting peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNCs) via acupoints to treat PAD. We first reviewed the short-term and long-term clinical results of PAD patients treated with PBMNCs through intramuscular non-acupoint transplantation (control group; n = 45) or intramuscular acupoint transplantation (acupoint group; n = 45) at a single university hospital general medical center between December 2002 and September 2022. Pain intensity (assessed with the verbal rating scale [VRS] score) in the acupoint group was considerably lower than that in the control group at month 1 (mean ± standard deviation [SD]: 1.29 ± 0.96 vs 1.76 ± 0.82; <i>P</i> = 0.016) and month 3 (mean ± SD: 1.27 ± 0.90 vs 1.61 ± 0.86; <i>P</i> = 0.042). We observed significant improvement of VRS score (<i>P</i> < .001 for all) and ankle-brachial index (ABI; <i>P</i> < .001 for all) from baseline in both groups at months 1, 3, 6, 12, 36, and 60. The 10-year cumulative rate of major amputation-free survival (MAFS) was higher in the acupoint group as compared to the control group (81.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 71.3%-94.1% vs 78.5%, 95% CI: 66.7%-92.3%; <i>P</i> = 0.768). Compared with the routine injection method, intramuscular transplantation of PBMNCs via selected acupoints could significantly decrease the short-term pain intensity in patients with PAD, which remains an option for consideration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":67343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"血液科学(英文)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"e00175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10789451/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"血液科学(英文)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BS9.0000000000000175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"血液科学(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BS9.0000000000000175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
许多研究讨论了使用细胞疗法或针灸治疗外周动脉疾病(PAD)的疗效。然而,目前还没有关于通过穴位移植外周血单核细胞(PBMNC)治疗 PAD 的安全性和有效性的长期研究。我们首先回顾了2002年12月至2022年9月期间在一家大学医院综合医疗中心通过肌肉注射非穴位移植(对照组;n = 45)或肌肉注射穴位移植(穴位组;n = 45)用PBMNCs治疗PAD患者的短期和长期临床结果。在第 1 个月(平均值±标准差[SD]:1.29±0.96 vs 1.76±0.82;P = 0.016)和第 3 个月(平均值±标准差:1.27±0.90 vs 1.61±0.86;P = 0.042),穴位组的疼痛强度(用口头评分量表[VRS]评分评估)明显低于对照组。我们观察到,在第 1、3、6、12、36 和 60 个月时,两组患者的 VRS 评分(P < .001)和踝肱指数(ABI;P < .001)均较基线有明显改善。与对照组相比,穴位组的 10 年无截肢累积存活率(MAFS)更高(81.9%,95% 置信区间 [CI]: 71.3%-94.1% vs 78.5%,95% CI: 66.7%-92.3%; P = 0.768)。与常规注射方法相比,通过选定穴位肌肉移植 PBMNCs 可显著降低 PAD 患者的短期疼痛强度,仍是一个值得考虑的选择。
Acupoint transplantation versus non-acupoint transplantation using autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells in treating peripheral arterial disease.
Numerous studies have discussed the therapeutic outcomes of using cell therapy or acupuncture to treat peripheral artery disease (PAD). However, there are no long-term studies on the safety and efficacy of transplanting peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNCs) via acupoints to treat PAD. We first reviewed the short-term and long-term clinical results of PAD patients treated with PBMNCs through intramuscular non-acupoint transplantation (control group; n = 45) or intramuscular acupoint transplantation (acupoint group; n = 45) at a single university hospital general medical center between December 2002 and September 2022. Pain intensity (assessed with the verbal rating scale [VRS] score) in the acupoint group was considerably lower than that in the control group at month 1 (mean ± standard deviation [SD]: 1.29 ± 0.96 vs 1.76 ± 0.82; P = 0.016) and month 3 (mean ± SD: 1.27 ± 0.90 vs 1.61 ± 0.86; P = 0.042). We observed significant improvement of VRS score (P < .001 for all) and ankle-brachial index (ABI; P < .001 for all) from baseline in both groups at months 1, 3, 6, 12, 36, and 60. The 10-year cumulative rate of major amputation-free survival (MAFS) was higher in the acupoint group as compared to the control group (81.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 71.3%-94.1% vs 78.5%, 95% CI: 66.7%-92.3%; P = 0.768). Compared with the routine injection method, intramuscular transplantation of PBMNCs via selected acupoints could significantly decrease the short-term pain intensity in patients with PAD, which remains an option for consideration.