Mélanie Spedener , Morten Tofastrud , Gunnar Austrheim , Barbara Zimmermann
{"title":"浏览器栖息地中的食草动物:北方森林中觅食牛的资源选择","authors":"Mélanie Spedener , Morten Tofastrud , Gunnar Austrheim , Barbara Zimmermann","doi":"10.1016/j.rama.2023.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In Norway, cattle <em>(Bos taurus)</em> are released to large areas of boreal forest for summer grazing. To determine to what degree this practice challenges timber production and wildlife management, we need a better understanding of basic cattle ecology. What do cattle, typical grazers, feed on in a habitat typically used by browsers? We determined cattle's resource use and selection at three scales: habitat and microhabitat selection when foraging and diet selection. Boreal forest is dominated by grass-poor habitats, and despite their strong selection for grass-rich habitats, cows spent a lot of time in suboptimal habitats, like old bilberry <em>(Vaccinium myrtillus)</em> spruce <em>(Picea abies)</em> forest. However, they managed to find grass-rich habitat patches within those, selecting for patches with bentgrass (<em>Agrostis</em> spp<em>.</em>)<em>.</em> Graminoids, mainly wavy hair-grass (<em>Avenella</em> spp<em>.</em>)<em>,</em> tussock grass (<em>Deschampsia</em>), and true sedges (<em>Carex</em> spp.)<em>,</em> made up the biggest part of the fecal samples. Woody plants, mainly willow (<em>Salix</em> spp<em>.</em>)<em>, Vaccinium</em> spp.<em>,</em> pine (<em>Pinus</em> spp<em>.</em>), and birch (<em>Betula</em> spp<em>.</em>)<em>,</em> made up 9.4% ± 4.7% of the samples, a value lower than reported for other forest grazing cattle. Cattle avoided woody plants in their diet and selected for graminoids. They preferred deciduous over coniferous species. At these low stocking densities, the cows were grazers in this browser's habitat. Moreover, they selected rather on habitat and patch scale than for individual plants within a given habitat patch, considered typical for a grazer. Their grass-rich diet indicates little overlap with the diet of local wild ungulates, which are mostly browsers. Their aversion of spruce and selection for graminoids and deciduous trees indicates low conflict risk for browsing damages and even a beneficial weeding effect on trees planted for timber production.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49634,"journal":{"name":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550742423001367/pdfft?md5=0bd0021f68eb93646f8808846b299629&pid=1-s2.0-S1550742423001367-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Grazer in a Browser's Habitat: Resource Selection of Foraging Cattle in Productive Boreal Forest\",\"authors\":\"Mélanie Spedener , Morten Tofastrud , Gunnar Austrheim , Barbara Zimmermann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rama.2023.12.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In Norway, cattle <em>(Bos taurus)</em> are released to large areas of boreal forest for summer grazing. To determine to what degree this practice challenges timber production and wildlife management, we need a better understanding of basic cattle ecology. What do cattle, typical grazers, feed on in a habitat typically used by browsers? We determined cattle's resource use and selection at three scales: habitat and microhabitat selection when foraging and diet selection. Boreal forest is dominated by grass-poor habitats, and despite their strong selection for grass-rich habitats, cows spent a lot of time in suboptimal habitats, like old bilberry <em>(Vaccinium myrtillus)</em> spruce <em>(Picea abies)</em> forest. However, they managed to find grass-rich habitat patches within those, selecting for patches with bentgrass (<em>Agrostis</em> spp<em>.</em>)<em>.</em> Graminoids, mainly wavy hair-grass (<em>Avenella</em> spp<em>.</em>)<em>,</em> tussock grass (<em>Deschampsia</em>), and true sedges (<em>Carex</em> spp.)<em>,</em> made up the biggest part of the fecal samples. Woody plants, mainly willow (<em>Salix</em> spp<em>.</em>)<em>, Vaccinium</em> spp.<em>,</em> pine (<em>Pinus</em> spp<em>.</em>), and birch (<em>Betula</em> spp<em>.</em>)<em>,</em> made up 9.4% ± 4.7% of the samples, a value lower than reported for other forest grazing cattle. Cattle avoided woody plants in their diet and selected for graminoids. They preferred deciduous over coniferous species. At these low stocking densities, the cows were grazers in this browser's habitat. Moreover, they selected rather on habitat and patch scale than for individual plants within a given habitat patch, considered typical for a grazer. Their grass-rich diet indicates little overlap with the diet of local wild ungulates, which are mostly browsers. Their aversion of spruce and selection for graminoids and deciduous trees indicates low conflict risk for browsing damages and even a beneficial weeding effect on trees planted for timber production.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rangeland Ecology & Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550742423001367/pdfft?md5=0bd0021f68eb93646f8808846b299629&pid=1-s2.0-S1550742423001367-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rangeland Ecology & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550742423001367\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550742423001367","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Grazer in a Browser's Habitat: Resource Selection of Foraging Cattle in Productive Boreal Forest
In Norway, cattle (Bos taurus) are released to large areas of boreal forest for summer grazing. To determine to what degree this practice challenges timber production and wildlife management, we need a better understanding of basic cattle ecology. What do cattle, typical grazers, feed on in a habitat typically used by browsers? We determined cattle's resource use and selection at three scales: habitat and microhabitat selection when foraging and diet selection. Boreal forest is dominated by grass-poor habitats, and despite their strong selection for grass-rich habitats, cows spent a lot of time in suboptimal habitats, like old bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) spruce (Picea abies) forest. However, they managed to find grass-rich habitat patches within those, selecting for patches with bentgrass (Agrostis spp.). Graminoids, mainly wavy hair-grass (Avenella spp.), tussock grass (Deschampsia), and true sedges (Carex spp.), made up the biggest part of the fecal samples. Woody plants, mainly willow (Salix spp.), Vaccinium spp., pine (Pinus spp.), and birch (Betula spp.), made up 9.4% ± 4.7% of the samples, a value lower than reported for other forest grazing cattle. Cattle avoided woody plants in their diet and selected for graminoids. They preferred deciduous over coniferous species. At these low stocking densities, the cows were grazers in this browser's habitat. Moreover, they selected rather on habitat and patch scale than for individual plants within a given habitat patch, considered typical for a grazer. Their grass-rich diet indicates little overlap with the diet of local wild ungulates, which are mostly browsers. Their aversion of spruce and selection for graminoids and deciduous trees indicates low conflict risk for browsing damages and even a beneficial weeding effect on trees planted for timber production.
期刊介绍:
Rangeland Ecology & Management publishes all topics-including ecology, management, socioeconomic and policy-pertaining to global rangelands. The journal''s mission is to inform academics, ecosystem managers and policy makers of science-based information to promote sound rangeland stewardship. Author submissions are published in five manuscript categories: original research papers, high-profile forum topics, concept syntheses, as well as research and technical notes.
Rangelands represent approximately 50% of the Earth''s land area and provision multiple ecosystem services for large human populations. This expansive and diverse land area functions as coupled human-ecological systems. Knowledge of both social and biophysical system components and their interactions represent the foundation for informed rangeland stewardship. Rangeland Ecology & Management uniquely integrates information from multiple system components to address current and pending challenges confronting global rangelands.