"这是我的死亡之山":极右保守派对美国英语教师及其课堂实践的影响

Carlin Borsheim-Black
{"title":"\"这是我的死亡之山\":极右保守派对美国英语教师及其课堂实践的影响","authors":"Carlin Borsheim-Black","doi":"10.1108/etpc-05-2023-0053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>From book challenges to anti–critical race theory and anti-lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and questioning legislation, US English teachers have been on the receiving end of a considerable amount of far-right conservative pushback. This study aims to explore the effects of conservative pushback on individual English teachers and their classroom practice. What pushbacks have individual English teachers faced? How has pushback impacted their teaching? What strategies have they developed for navigating pushback?</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This qualitative study explores secondary English teachers’ reported experiences with conservative backlash as reported in 15 semi-structured interviews conducted between May 2022 and August 2023.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Participants reported feeling the pressure of increased levels of pushback, and many reported censoring their book selections to avoid additional public scrutiny. At the same time, they also described a range of strategies they have developed for protecting themselves and their practice, such as codifying curriculum, increasing transparency, formalizing review processes for challenging books and strengthening their resolve to resist.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study offers a timely window on a pressing problem affecting the daily practice of English teachers in the USA.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":501133,"journal":{"name":"English Teaching: Practice & Critique","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“This is my hill to die on”: effects of far-right conservative pushback on US English teachers and their classroom practice\",\"authors\":\"Carlin Borsheim-Black\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/etpc-05-2023-0053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>From book challenges to anti–critical race theory and anti-lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and questioning legislation, US English teachers have been on the receiving end of a considerable amount of far-right conservative pushback. This study aims to explore the effects of conservative pushback on individual English teachers and their classroom practice. What pushbacks have individual English teachers faced? How has pushback impacted their teaching? What strategies have they developed for navigating pushback?</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>This qualitative study explores secondary English teachers’ reported experiences with conservative backlash as reported in 15 semi-structured interviews conducted between May 2022 and August 2023.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Participants reported feeling the pressure of increased levels of pushback, and many reported censoring their book selections to avoid additional public scrutiny. At the same time, they also described a range of strategies they have developed for protecting themselves and their practice, such as codifying curriculum, increasing transparency, formalizing review processes for challenging books and strengthening their resolve to resist.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This study offers a timely window on a pressing problem affecting the daily practice of English teachers in the USA.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":501133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"English Teaching: Practice & Critique\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"English Teaching: Practice & Critique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/etpc-05-2023-0053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Teaching: Practice & Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/etpc-05-2023-0053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的从反种族批判理论的书籍挑战到反男女同性恋、双性恋、变性者、同性恋者和质疑者的立法,美国英语教师一直处于极右保守派的大量反击之下。本研究旨在探讨保守派的反击对英语教师个人及其课堂实践的影响。个别英语教师面临了哪些反击?反击如何影响了他们的教学?他们制定了哪些策略来应对反击?这项定性研究探讨了中学英语教师在 2022 年 5 月至 2023 年 8 月期间进行的 15 次半结构式访谈中报告的保守派反击的经历。研究结果参与者报告说,他们感受到了反击程度增加的压力,许多人报告说,他们审查了自己的选书,以避免更多的公众审查。与此同时,他们还介绍了为保护自己和自己的教学实践而制定的一系列策略,如编纂课程、增加透明度、将具有挑战性的书籍的审查程序正规化,以及加强抵制的决心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“This is my hill to die on”: effects of far-right conservative pushback on US English teachers and their classroom practice

Purpose

From book challenges to anti–critical race theory and anti-lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and questioning legislation, US English teachers have been on the receiving end of a considerable amount of far-right conservative pushback. This study aims to explore the effects of conservative pushback on individual English teachers and their classroom practice. What pushbacks have individual English teachers faced? How has pushback impacted their teaching? What strategies have they developed for navigating pushback?

Design/methodology/approach

This qualitative study explores secondary English teachers’ reported experiences with conservative backlash as reported in 15 semi-structured interviews conducted between May 2022 and August 2023.

Findings

Participants reported feeling the pressure of increased levels of pushback, and many reported censoring their book selections to avoid additional public scrutiny. At the same time, they also described a range of strategies they have developed for protecting themselves and their practice, such as codifying curriculum, increasing transparency, formalizing review processes for challenging books and strengthening their resolve to resist.

Originality/value

This study offers a timely window on a pressing problem affecting the daily practice of English teachers in the USA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adopting a languaging approach for teaching about the climate crisis in English language arts Form, criticality, and humanity: topic modeling the field of literary studies for English education I apologize: body positivity love movements “We're loud, why aren't you?” Laura’s social media activism through justice-oriented literacies Loving the skin, you’re in: a deconstruction of children’s literature that focus on body (size) issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1