切口疝的开腹和腹腔镜手术方法:描述性分析

IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY Chirurgia Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.21614/chirurgia.2023.v.118.i.6.p.654
Vlad Paic, Petru Adrian Radu, Dan Cartu, Dragos Garofil, Anca Tigora, Mihai Zurzu, Mircea Bratucu, Valentin Georgescu, Costin Pasnicu, Raluca Gabriela Ioan, Florian Popa, Traean Burcos, Valeriu Surlin, Victor Strambu, Razvan Daniel Chivu
{"title":"切口疝的开腹和腹腔镜手术方法:描述性分析","authors":"Vlad Paic, Petru Adrian Radu, Dan Cartu, Dragos Garofil, Anca Tigora, Mihai Zurzu, Mircea Bratucu, Valentin Georgescu, Costin Pasnicu, Raluca Gabriela Ioan, Florian Popa, Traean Burcos, Valeriu Surlin, Victor Strambu, Razvan Daniel Chivu","doi":"10.21614/chirurgia.2023.v.118.i.6.p.654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Incisional hernias, occurring in 10-20% of patients post-abdominal surgery, significantly affect patient quality of life and healthcare systems. This study analyses two hernia repair methods: laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) and open on-lay hernioplasty. Key analysis factors include operative time, postoperative pain, complications, length of hospital stay, recovery speed, and recurrence rates, with the goal of identifying the most effective and beneficial approach for patients. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective study on 70 patients with postoperative parietal defects at the Dr Carol Davila Clinical Nephrology Hospital, Bucharest, from January 2018 to December 2021. Patients underwent either laparoscopic IPOM (42 patients) or open hernioplasty (28 patients) for uncomplicated incisional hernia repair. We analyzed demographic data, comorbidities, defect size and location, previous surgeries, and surgical outcomes. <b>Results:</b> The laparoscopic group had a slightly shorter operative time and significantly lower postoperative pain levels, as assessed by the Visual Analog Scale. The laparoscopic approach also resulted in shorter hospital stays and quicker return to routine activities. Complications, such as seroma and hematoma, were more common in the open surgery group, but no wound infections or prosthesis rejections were observed in either group. Notably, the open surgery group showed a higher recurrence rate (11 %) compared to none in the laparoscopic group within a one-year follow-up. Conclusion: Laparoscopic IPOM for incisional hernia repair shows benefits over open hernioplasty, with less pain, shorter hospitalization, faster recovery, and lower recurrence. Its growing preference and potential for further research are highlighted.</p>","PeriodicalId":10171,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open and Laparoscopic Surgical Approache in Incisional Hernias: A Descriptive Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Vlad Paic, Petru Adrian Radu, Dan Cartu, Dragos Garofil, Anca Tigora, Mihai Zurzu, Mircea Bratucu, Valentin Georgescu, Costin Pasnicu, Raluca Gabriela Ioan, Florian Popa, Traean Burcos, Valeriu Surlin, Victor Strambu, Razvan Daniel Chivu\",\"doi\":\"10.21614/chirurgia.2023.v.118.i.6.p.654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Incisional hernias, occurring in 10-20% of patients post-abdominal surgery, significantly affect patient quality of life and healthcare systems. This study analyses two hernia repair methods: laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) and open on-lay hernioplasty. Key analysis factors include operative time, postoperative pain, complications, length of hospital stay, recovery speed, and recurrence rates, with the goal of identifying the most effective and beneficial approach for patients. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective study on 70 patients with postoperative parietal defects at the Dr Carol Davila Clinical Nephrology Hospital, Bucharest, from January 2018 to December 2021. Patients underwent either laparoscopic IPOM (42 patients) or open hernioplasty (28 patients) for uncomplicated incisional hernia repair. We analyzed demographic data, comorbidities, defect size and location, previous surgeries, and surgical outcomes. <b>Results:</b> The laparoscopic group had a slightly shorter operative time and significantly lower postoperative pain levels, as assessed by the Visual Analog Scale. The laparoscopic approach also resulted in shorter hospital stays and quicker return to routine activities. Complications, such as seroma and hematoma, were more common in the open surgery group, but no wound infections or prosthesis rejections were observed in either group. Notably, the open surgery group showed a higher recurrence rate (11 %) compared to none in the laparoscopic group within a one-year follow-up. Conclusion: Laparoscopic IPOM for incisional hernia repair shows benefits over open hernioplasty, with less pain, shorter hospitalization, faster recovery, and lower recurrence. Its growing preference and potential for further research are highlighted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chirurgia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chirurgia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.2023.v.118.i.6.p.654\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.2023.v.118.i.6.p.654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:10%-20%的腹部手术后患者会出现切口疝,对患者的生活质量和医疗系统造成严重影响。本研究分析了两种疝气修补方法:腹腔镜腹腔内铺设网片(IPOM)和开放式铺设疝成形术。主要分析因素包括手术时间、术后疼痛、并发症、住院时间、恢复速度和复发率,目的是找出对患者最有效、最有益的方法。研究方法2018年1月至2021年12月,我们对布加勒斯特卡罗尔-达维拉博士临床肾脏病医院的70名术后顶叶缺损患者进行了回顾性研究。患者接受了腹腔镜 IPOM(42 例)或开腹疝成形术(28 例)进行无并发症切口疝修补。我们分析了人口统计学数据、合并症、缺损大小和位置、既往手术和手术结果。结果显示根据视觉模拟量表(Visual Analog Scale)的评估,腹腔镜组的手术时间略短,术后疼痛程度明显降低。腹腔镜方法还能缩短住院时间,更快地恢复日常活动。血清肿和血肿等并发症在开腹手术组更为常见,但两组均未发现伤口感染或假体排斥现象。值得注意的是,开腹手术组的复发率较高(11%),而腹腔镜手术组在一年的随访中没有复发。结论腹腔镜切口疝修补术(IPOM)与开腹疝成形术相比,具有疼痛轻、住院时间短、恢复快、复发率低等优点。腹腔镜疝气修补术越来越受到青睐,并具有进一步研究的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Open and Laparoscopic Surgical Approache in Incisional Hernias: A Descriptive Analysis.

Background: Incisional hernias, occurring in 10-20% of patients post-abdominal surgery, significantly affect patient quality of life and healthcare systems. This study analyses two hernia repair methods: laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) and open on-lay hernioplasty. Key analysis factors include operative time, postoperative pain, complications, length of hospital stay, recovery speed, and recurrence rates, with the goal of identifying the most effective and beneficial approach for patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on 70 patients with postoperative parietal defects at the Dr Carol Davila Clinical Nephrology Hospital, Bucharest, from January 2018 to December 2021. Patients underwent either laparoscopic IPOM (42 patients) or open hernioplasty (28 patients) for uncomplicated incisional hernia repair. We analyzed demographic data, comorbidities, defect size and location, previous surgeries, and surgical outcomes. Results: The laparoscopic group had a slightly shorter operative time and significantly lower postoperative pain levels, as assessed by the Visual Analog Scale. The laparoscopic approach also resulted in shorter hospital stays and quicker return to routine activities. Complications, such as seroma and hematoma, were more common in the open surgery group, but no wound infections or prosthesis rejections were observed in either group. Notably, the open surgery group showed a higher recurrence rate (11 %) compared to none in the laparoscopic group within a one-year follow-up. Conclusion: Laparoscopic IPOM for incisional hernia repair shows benefits over open hernioplasty, with less pain, shorter hospitalization, faster recovery, and lower recurrence. Its growing preference and potential for further research are highlighted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chirurgia
Chirurgia Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal. In Chirurgia, original papers in the area of general surgery which neither appeared, nor were sent for publication in other periodicals, can be published. You can send original articles, new surgical techniques, or comprehensive general reports on surgical topics, clinical case presentations and, depending on publication space, - reviews of some articles of general interest to surgeons from other publications. Chirurgia is also a place for sharing information about the activity of various branches of the Romanian Society of Surgery, information on Congresses and Symposiums organized by the Romanian Society of Surgery and participation notes in other scientific meetings. Letters to the editor: Letters commenting on papers published in Chirurgia are welcomed. They should contain substantive ideas and commentaries supported by appropriate data, and should not exceed 2 pages. Please submit these letters to the editor through our online system.
期刊最新文献
Ramp Lesions with ACL Injuries Between MRI and Arthroscopic Evaluation. Comparative Statistical Analysis of Surgical Procedures in the Management of Hirschsprung Disease. Ovarian Carcinoma - A Single Centre Case-Series Descriptive Analysis of Surgical Procedures. Burn Injuries in the Pediatric Population - The Experience of a Single Center Over a Period of Two Years. Polymorphisms of CD44 rs187115 as a Predictive Biomarker in Early Colorectal Cancer Diagnostic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1