Heather Flowers, David Mikulis, Frank Silver, Kannika Hour, Jason Steffener, Julien Poublanc, Elizabeth Rochon, Rosemary Martino
{"title":"急性脑卒中后同时出现吞咽和交流障碍的共同神经解剖学基础","authors":"Heather Flowers, David Mikulis, Frank Silver, Kannika Hour, Jason Steffener, Julien Poublanc, Elizabeth Rochon, Rosemary Martino","doi":"10.1159/000536231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Post-stroke dysphagia and communication impairments occur in two-thirds of acute stroke survivors. Identifying the shared neuroanatomical substrate for related impairments could facilitate the development of cross-system therapies. Our purpose was to elucidate discrete brain regions predictive of the combined presence of dysphagia alongside dysarthria and/or aphasia post-stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 40 right hemisphere stroke (RHS) and 67 left hemisphere stroke (LHS) patients from an acute ischemic stroke cohort with lesions demarcated on diffusion-weighted imaging. We undertook binary non-parametric voxel-lesion symptom mapping with a false discovery rate of p < 0.05 for co-occurring dysphagia, dysarthria, and aphasia (LHS only). If no voxels survived the threshold, a cluster analysis of >20 voxels involving an uncorrected p < 0.01 was applied to identify brain regions associated with the co-occurring impairments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cluster analyses revealed that dysphagia and dysarthria were associated with insular and superior temporal gyrus (STG) involvement after RHS and with basal ganglia (BG), internal capsule, and thalamic involvement after LHS. Co-occurring dysphagia, dysarthria, and aphasia were associated with BG, STG, and insular cortex involvement.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings highlight the role of the insula and structures of the BG in co-occurrence patterns involving dysphagia, dysarthria, and aphasia. These newly identified biomarkers may inform new rehabilitation therapeutic targets for treating cross-system functions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9683,"journal":{"name":"Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"789-793"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shared Neuroanatomical Substrates for Co-Occurring Swallowing and Communication Impairments after Acute Stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Heather Flowers, David Mikulis, Frank Silver, Kannika Hour, Jason Steffener, Julien Poublanc, Elizabeth Rochon, Rosemary Martino\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000536231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Post-stroke dysphagia and communication impairments occur in two-thirds of acute stroke survivors. Identifying the shared neuroanatomical substrate for related impairments could facilitate the development of cross-system therapies. Our purpose was to elucidate discrete brain regions predictive of the combined presence of dysphagia alongside dysarthria and/or aphasia post-stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 40 right hemisphere stroke (RHS) and 67 left hemisphere stroke (LHS) patients from an acute ischemic stroke cohort with lesions demarcated on diffusion-weighted imaging. We undertook binary non-parametric voxel-lesion symptom mapping with a false discovery rate of p < 0.05 for co-occurring dysphagia, dysarthria, and aphasia (LHS only). If no voxels survived the threshold, a cluster analysis of >20 voxels involving an uncorrected p < 0.01 was applied to identify brain regions associated with the co-occurring impairments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cluster analyses revealed that dysphagia and dysarthria were associated with insular and superior temporal gyrus (STG) involvement after RHS and with basal ganglia (BG), internal capsule, and thalamic involvement after LHS. Co-occurring dysphagia, dysarthria, and aphasia were associated with BG, STG, and insular cortex involvement.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings highlight the role of the insula and structures of the BG in co-occurrence patterns involving dysphagia, dysarthria, and aphasia. These newly identified biomarkers may inform new rehabilitation therapeutic targets for treating cross-system functions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cerebrovascular Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"789-793\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cerebrovascular Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000536231\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000536231","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:三分之二的急性中风幸存者会出现中风后吞咽困难和交流障碍。确定相关损伤的共同神经解剖基底有助于开发跨系统疗法。我们的目的是阐明可预测卒中后同时出现吞咽困难、构音障碍和/或失语症的离散脑区:我们纳入了急性缺血性中风患者队列中的 40 名右半球(RHS)和 67 名左半球(LHS)患者,这些患者的病变在弥散加权成像中均有标示。我们进行了二元非参数体素-病灶症状映射,假发现率为 p 20,涉及未经校正的 p 结果:聚类分析显示,RHS 后吞咽困难和构音障碍与岛叶和颞上回(STG)受累有关,LHS 后吞咽困难和构音障碍与基底节(BG)、内囊和丘脑受累有关。同时出现的吞咽困难、构音障碍和失语症与BG、STG和岛叶皮层受累有关:讨论:我们的研究结果突显了岛叶和大脑皮层结构在吞咽困难、构音障碍和失语症并发模式中的作用。这些新发现的生物标志物可为治疗跨系统功能的新康复治疗目标提供依据。
Shared Neuroanatomical Substrates for Co-Occurring Swallowing and Communication Impairments after Acute Stroke.
Introduction: Post-stroke dysphagia and communication impairments occur in two-thirds of acute stroke survivors. Identifying the shared neuroanatomical substrate for related impairments could facilitate the development of cross-system therapies. Our purpose was to elucidate discrete brain regions predictive of the combined presence of dysphagia alongside dysarthria and/or aphasia post-stroke.
Methods: We included 40 right hemisphere stroke (RHS) and 67 left hemisphere stroke (LHS) patients from an acute ischemic stroke cohort with lesions demarcated on diffusion-weighted imaging. We undertook binary non-parametric voxel-lesion symptom mapping with a false discovery rate of p < 0.05 for co-occurring dysphagia, dysarthria, and aphasia (LHS only). If no voxels survived the threshold, a cluster analysis of >20 voxels involving an uncorrected p < 0.01 was applied to identify brain regions associated with the co-occurring impairments.
Results: Cluster analyses revealed that dysphagia and dysarthria were associated with insular and superior temporal gyrus (STG) involvement after RHS and with basal ganglia (BG), internal capsule, and thalamic involvement after LHS. Co-occurring dysphagia, dysarthria, and aphasia were associated with BG, STG, and insular cortex involvement.
Discussion: Our findings highlight the role of the insula and structures of the BG in co-occurrence patterns involving dysphagia, dysarthria, and aphasia. These newly identified biomarkers may inform new rehabilitation therapeutic targets for treating cross-system functions.
期刊介绍:
A rapidly-growing field, stroke and cerebrovascular research is unique in that it involves a variety of specialties such as neurology, internal medicine, surgery, radiology, epidemiology, cardiology, hematology, psychology and rehabilitation. ''Cerebrovascular Diseases'' is an international forum which meets the growing need for sophisticated, up-to-date scientific information on clinical data, diagnostic testing, and therapeutic issues, dealing with all aspects of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. It contains original contributions, reviews of selected topics and clinical investigative studies, recent meeting reports and work-in-progress as well as discussions on controversial issues. All aspects related to clinical advances are considered, while purely experimental work appears if directly relevant to clinical issues.