[使用全自动快速鉴定药敏试验系统 RAISAS S4 评估 MRSA 的耐甲氧西林时间]。

Miyako Aso, Kae Kawamura, Kazumi Kanaya, Tatsuki Mura, Yoshitsugu Iinuma
{"title":"[使用全自动快速鉴定药敏试验系统 RAISAS S4 评估 MRSA 的耐甲氧西林时间]。","authors":"Miyako Aso, Kae Kawamura, Kazumi Kanaya, Tatsuki Mura, Yoshitsugu Iinuma","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we examined the accuracy and rapidity of drug susceptibility determination using clinical isolates of MRSA with the fully automated rapid identification susceptibility testing system RAISUS S4. Ninety eight MRSA strains were used and the time until methicillin resistance was determined was analyzed by both of the standard method (18-hr method) and the rapid method. Five strains (5.1%) were determined to be methicillin-sensitive in MPIPC by rapid method only while all strains were determined to be resistant in CFX. The average methicillin resistance determination time was 7.0/5.0 hr for MPIPC, 6.3/5.0 hr for CFX, and 6.3/5.0 hr for the combination of MPIPC and CFX by the standard/rapid method, with the rapid method being significantly shorter (Wilcoxon's signed rank sum test, p<0.01). Strains determined to be methicillin-sensitive by MPIPC tended to have a longer time to methicillin resistance by the standard method, but this effect was much less pronounced for the rapid method using CFX. Methicillin resistance determination by the rapid method using RAISUS S4 enables rapid detection of MRSA without false-susceptible results, which may lead to early and appropriate treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"33 1","pages":"7-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Evaluation of Methicillin Resistance Determination Time for MRSA Using Fully Automated Rapid Identification Susceptibility testing system RAISAS S4].\",\"authors\":\"Miyako Aso, Kae Kawamura, Kazumi Kanaya, Tatsuki Mura, Yoshitsugu Iinuma\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this study, we examined the accuracy and rapidity of drug susceptibility determination using clinical isolates of MRSA with the fully automated rapid identification susceptibility testing system RAISUS S4. Ninety eight MRSA strains were used and the time until methicillin resistance was determined was analyzed by both of the standard method (18-hr method) and the rapid method. Five strains (5.1%) were determined to be methicillin-sensitive in MPIPC by rapid method only while all strains were determined to be resistant in CFX. The average methicillin resistance determination time was 7.0/5.0 hr for MPIPC, 6.3/5.0 hr for CFX, and 6.3/5.0 hr for the combination of MPIPC and CFX by the standard/rapid method, with the rapid method being significantly shorter (Wilcoxon's signed rank sum test, p<0.01). Strains determined to be methicillin-sensitive by MPIPC tended to have a longer time to methicillin resistance by the standard method, but this effect was much less pronounced for the rapid method using CFX. Methicillin resistance determination by the rapid method using RAISUS S4 enables rapid detection of MRSA without false-susceptible results, which may lead to early and appropriate treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"7-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,我们使用全自动快速鉴定药敏试验系统 RAISUS S4 检验了使用临床分离的 MRSA 进行药敏测定的准确性和快速性。我们使用了 98 株 MRSA,并通过标准方法(18 小时法)和快速方法分析了甲氧西林耐药性的测定时间。在 MPIPC 中,有五株菌株(5.1%)仅用快速法测定为对甲氧西林敏感,而在 CFX 中,所有菌株均被确定为耐药。标准/快速法测定 MPIPC 对甲氧西林耐药的平均时间为 7.0/5.0 小时,CFX 为 6.3/5.0 小时,MPIPC 和 CFX 组合为 6.3/5.0 小时,其中快速法测定时间明显更短(Wilcoxon 签名秩和检验,P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Evaluation of Methicillin Resistance Determination Time for MRSA Using Fully Automated Rapid Identification Susceptibility testing system RAISAS S4].

In this study, we examined the accuracy and rapidity of drug susceptibility determination using clinical isolates of MRSA with the fully automated rapid identification susceptibility testing system RAISUS S4. Ninety eight MRSA strains were used and the time until methicillin resistance was determined was analyzed by both of the standard method (18-hr method) and the rapid method. Five strains (5.1%) were determined to be methicillin-sensitive in MPIPC by rapid method only while all strains were determined to be resistant in CFX. The average methicillin resistance determination time was 7.0/5.0 hr for MPIPC, 6.3/5.0 hr for CFX, and 6.3/5.0 hr for the combination of MPIPC and CFX by the standard/rapid method, with the rapid method being significantly shorter (Wilcoxon's signed rank sum test, p<0.01). Strains determined to be methicillin-sensitive by MPIPC tended to have a longer time to methicillin resistance by the standard method, but this effect was much less pronounced for the rapid method using CFX. Methicillin resistance determination by the rapid method using RAISUS S4 enables rapid detection of MRSA without false-susceptible results, which may lead to early and appropriate treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Japanese Case of COVID-19 Caused by Omicron Strain with Y453F Substitution. [Evaluation of Methicillin Resistance Determination Time for MRSA Using Fully Automated Rapid Identification Susceptibility testing system RAISAS S4]. [Evaluation of the Clinical Validity of the Clostridioides difficile Nucleic Acid Detection Kit "Smart Gene® CD ToxinB"]. [Relationship between Serotypes and Biotypes of Yersinia enterocolitica and the Names of Identified Bacteria in the Microbial Identification and Susceptibility Testing Devices]. Comparison of Microorganism Detection, Time to Positivity, and Time-Dependent Shift in Viable Bacterial Count from VersaTREK and BacT/ALERT 3D Blood Culture Systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1