居家姑息关怀的系统优势和需求:探索复杂性

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Revista clinica espanola Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rce.2023.11.004
X. Busquet-Duran , B.M. Carralero , J. Bielsa-Pascual , L. Milian-Adriazola , N. Salamero-Tura , P. Torán-Monserrat
{"title":"居家姑息关怀的系统优势和需求:探索复杂性","authors":"X. Busquet-Duran ,&nbsp;B.M. Carralero ,&nbsp;J. Bielsa-Pascual ,&nbsp;L. Milian-Adriazola ,&nbsp;N. Salamero-Tura ,&nbsp;P. Torán-Monserrat","doi":"10.1016/j.rce.2023.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We aimed to investigate the relationship between systemic strengths and complexity in home care of end-of-life patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Quantitative descriptive longitudinal study of patients cared for at home by a palliative care team. Place of death was analyzed in relation to complexity, as determined by the HexCom complexity model after the initial home assessment. We used Pearson's chi-square test to analyze the comparison of proportions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty-six hundred patients (74.4% oncologic) with a mean age of 76.2<!--> <!-->years (SD 13.2) participated. Fifty-three percent had complete or severe functional dependence, 30.8% were already bedridden in the first assessment, and 59.7% died at home. Strengths influenced place of death, specifically exosystem (team) strength (OR: 4.07 [1.92-8.63]), microsystem (both patient 0.51 [0.28-0.94]) and caregiver (OR: 3.90 [1.48-10.25]), and chronosystem, related to prediction of progressive course (OR: 2.22 [1.37-3.60]).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>To improve care for end-of-life patients and their families, a systemic view of dying and death that includes both needs and strengths is necessary. In this sense, the systemic framework proposed by Bonfrenbrenner can be useful for clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21223,"journal":{"name":"Revista clinica espanola","volume":"224 1","pages":"Pages 1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014256523001959/pdfft?md5=ec8c686cddaf62c5da8ac2867a5bd72a&pid=1-s2.0-S0014256523001959-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fortalezas sistémicas y necesidades en atención paliativa domiciliaria: explorando la complejidad\",\"authors\":\"X. Busquet-Duran ,&nbsp;B.M. Carralero ,&nbsp;J. Bielsa-Pascual ,&nbsp;L. Milian-Adriazola ,&nbsp;N. Salamero-Tura ,&nbsp;P. Torán-Monserrat\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rce.2023.11.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We aimed to investigate the relationship between systemic strengths and complexity in home care of end-of-life patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Quantitative descriptive longitudinal study of patients cared for at home by a palliative care team. Place of death was analyzed in relation to complexity, as determined by the HexCom complexity model after the initial home assessment. We used Pearson's chi-square test to analyze the comparison of proportions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty-six hundred patients (74.4% oncologic) with a mean age of 76.2<!--> <!-->years (SD 13.2) participated. Fifty-three percent had complete or severe functional dependence, 30.8% were already bedridden in the first assessment, and 59.7% died at home. Strengths influenced place of death, specifically exosystem (team) strength (OR: 4.07 [1.92-8.63]), microsystem (both patient 0.51 [0.28-0.94]) and caregiver (OR: 3.90 [1.48-10.25]), and chronosystem, related to prediction of progressive course (OR: 2.22 [1.37-3.60]).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>To improve care for end-of-life patients and their families, a systemic view of dying and death that includes both needs and strengths is necessary. In this sense, the systemic framework proposed by Bonfrenbrenner can be useful for clinical practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista clinica espanola\",\"volume\":\"224 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014256523001959/pdfft?md5=ec8c686cddaf62c5da8ac2867a5bd72a&pid=1-s2.0-S0014256523001959-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista clinica espanola\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014256523001959\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista clinica espanola","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014256523001959","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法对姑息治疗团队在家护理的患者进行定量描述性纵向研究。研究分析了死亡地点与复杂性的关系,复杂性是在初次家庭评估后根据 HexCom 复杂性模型确定的。我们使用皮尔逊卡方检验来分析比例比较。53%的患者有完全或严重的功能依赖,30.8%的患者在首次评估时已卧床不起,59.7%的患者死于家中。优势会影响死亡地点,特别是外在系统(团队)优势(OR:4.07 [1.92-8.63])、微观系统(患者 0.51 [0.28-0.94])和照护者(OR:3.90 [1.48-10.25]),以及与预测进展过程相关的时间系统(OR:2.22 [1.37-3.60])。从这个意义上讲,Bonfrenbrenner 提出的系统框架对临床实践很有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fortalezas sistémicas y necesidades en atención paliativa domiciliaria: explorando la complejidad

Objective

We aimed to investigate the relationship between systemic strengths and complexity in home care of end-of-life patients.

Methods

Quantitative descriptive longitudinal study of patients cared for at home by a palliative care team. Place of death was analyzed in relation to complexity, as determined by the HexCom complexity model after the initial home assessment. We used Pearson's chi-square test to analyze the comparison of proportions.

Results

Forty-six hundred patients (74.4% oncologic) with a mean age of 76.2 years (SD 13.2) participated. Fifty-three percent had complete or severe functional dependence, 30.8% were already bedridden in the first assessment, and 59.7% died at home. Strengths influenced place of death, specifically exosystem (team) strength (OR: 4.07 [1.92-8.63]), microsystem (both patient 0.51 [0.28-0.94]) and caregiver (OR: 3.90 [1.48-10.25]), and chronosystem, related to prediction of progressive course (OR: 2.22 [1.37-3.60]).

Conclusions

To improve care for end-of-life patients and their families, a systemic view of dying and death that includes both needs and strengths is necessary. In this sense, the systemic framework proposed by Bonfrenbrenner can be useful for clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista clinica espanola
Revista clinica espanola 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
73
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Revista Clínica Española published its first issue in 1940 and is the body of expression of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI). The journal fully endorses the goals of updating knowledge and facilitating the acquisition of key developments in internal medicine applied to clinical practice. Revista Clínica Española is subject to a thorough double blind review of the received articles written in Spanish or English. Nine issues are published each year, including mostly originals, reviews and consensus documents.
期刊最新文献
Transmisión de un brote de sarampión en la sala de espera de urgencias: el papel de la vacunación Sarampión en la sala de urgencias: el enemigo sigue ahí Seguimiento y tratamiento de la enfermedad tromboembólica venosa a largo plazo: recomendaciones del Grupo de Enfermedad Tromboembólica de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna 2024 Abordaje terapéutico de las crisis agudas de porfirias hepáticas Resumen ejecutivo del documento de consenso sobre la realización de la ecografía clínica: recomendaciones desde los Grupos de Trabajo de Ecografía Clínica de la SEMI, SEDAR, SEGG, SEMERGEN, SEMES, SEMFYC y SEMG
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1