PSF 误估和星系群偏差对使用 CNN 进行精确剪切测量的影响

IF 4.7 3区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Pub Date : 2024-01-17 DOI:10.1093/mnras/stae038
L M Voigt
{"title":"PSF 误估和星系群偏差对使用 CNN 进行精确剪切测量的影响","authors":"L M Voigt","doi":"10.1093/mnras/stae038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Weak gravitational lensing of distant galaxies provides a powerful probe of dark energy. The aim of this study is to investigate the application of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to precision shear estimation. In particular, using a shallow CNN, we explore the impact of point spread function (PSF) misestimation and ‘galaxy population bias’ (including ‘distribution bias’ and ‘morphology bias’), focusing on the accuracy requirements of next generation surveys. We simulate a population of noisy disk and elliptical galaxies and adopt a PSF that is representative of a Euclid-like survey. We quantify the accuracy achieved by the CNN assuming a linear relationship between the estimated and true shears and measure the multiplicative (m) and additive (c) biases. We make use of an unconventional loss function to mitigate the effects of noise bias and measure m and c when we use either: (i) an incorrect galaxy ellipticity distribution or size–magnitude relation, or the wrong ratio of morphological types, to describe the population of galaxies (distribution bias); (ii) an incorrect galaxy light profile (morphology bias); or (iii) a PSF with size or ellipticity offset from its true value (PSF misestimation). We compare our results to the Euclid requirements on the knowledge of the PSF model shape and size. Finally, we outline further work to build on the promising potential of CNNs in precision shear estimation.","PeriodicalId":18930,"journal":{"name":"Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of PSF misestimation and galaxy population bias on precision shear measurement using a CNN\",\"authors\":\"L M Voigt\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/mnras/stae038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Weak gravitational lensing of distant galaxies provides a powerful probe of dark energy. The aim of this study is to investigate the application of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to precision shear estimation. In particular, using a shallow CNN, we explore the impact of point spread function (PSF) misestimation and ‘galaxy population bias’ (including ‘distribution bias’ and ‘morphology bias’), focusing on the accuracy requirements of next generation surveys. We simulate a population of noisy disk and elliptical galaxies and adopt a PSF that is representative of a Euclid-like survey. We quantify the accuracy achieved by the CNN assuming a linear relationship between the estimated and true shears and measure the multiplicative (m) and additive (c) biases. We make use of an unconventional loss function to mitigate the effects of noise bias and measure m and c when we use either: (i) an incorrect galaxy ellipticity distribution or size–magnitude relation, or the wrong ratio of morphological types, to describe the population of galaxies (distribution bias); (ii) an incorrect galaxy light profile (morphology bias); or (iii) a PSF with size or ellipticity offset from its true value (PSF misestimation). We compare our results to the Euclid requirements on the knowledge of the PSF model shape and size. Finally, we outline further work to build on the promising potential of CNNs in precision shear estimation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae038\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

遥远星系的弱引力透镜是暗能量的有力探针。本研究旨在研究卷积神经网络(CNN)在精确剪切估算中的应用。特别是,利用浅层 CNN,我们探索了点扩散函数(PSF)误估和 "星系群偏差"(包括 "分布偏差 "和 "形态偏差")的影响,重点是下一代巡天的精度要求。我们模拟了一个由噪声盘星系和椭圆星系组成的星系群,并采用了一个能代表欧几里得类巡天观测的 PSF。假设估计剪切与真实剪切之间存在线性关系,我们对 CNN 所达到的精度进行量化,并测量乘法偏差(m)和加法偏差(c)。我们利用一个非常规损失函数来减轻噪声偏差的影响,并在以下情况下测量 m 和 c:(i) 使用不正确的星系椭圆度分布或大小-星等关系,或错误的形态类型比例来描述星系群(分布偏差);(ii) 使用不正确的星系光剖面(形态偏差);或 (iii) 使用大小或椭圆度偏离真实值的 PSF(PSF 误估)。我们将结果与 Euclid 对 PSF 模型形状和大小的要求进行了比较。最后,我们概述了 CNN 在精确剪切估算方面大有可为的进一步工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of PSF misestimation and galaxy population bias on precision shear measurement using a CNN
Weak gravitational lensing of distant galaxies provides a powerful probe of dark energy. The aim of this study is to investigate the application of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to precision shear estimation. In particular, using a shallow CNN, we explore the impact of point spread function (PSF) misestimation and ‘galaxy population bias’ (including ‘distribution bias’ and ‘morphology bias’), focusing on the accuracy requirements of next generation surveys. We simulate a population of noisy disk and elliptical galaxies and adopt a PSF that is representative of a Euclid-like survey. We quantify the accuracy achieved by the CNN assuming a linear relationship between the estimated and true shears and measure the multiplicative (m) and additive (c) biases. We make use of an unconventional loss function to mitigate the effects of noise bias and measure m and c when we use either: (i) an incorrect galaxy ellipticity distribution or size–magnitude relation, or the wrong ratio of morphological types, to describe the population of galaxies (distribution bias); (ii) an incorrect galaxy light profile (morphology bias); or (iii) a PSF with size or ellipticity offset from its true value (PSF misestimation). We compare our results to the Euclid requirements on the knowledge of the PSF model shape and size. Finally, we outline further work to build on the promising potential of CNNs in precision shear estimation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
37.50%
发文量
3198
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society is one of the world''s leading primary research journals in astronomy and astrophysics, as well as one of the longest established. It publishes the results of original research in positional and dynamical astronomy, astrophysics, radio astronomy, cosmology, space research and the design of astronomical instruments.
期刊最新文献
Predictive prognostic factors in patients with proximal humeral fracture treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty. AHKASH: a new Hybrid particle-in-cell code for simulations of astrophysical collisionless plasma. Uncovering Tidal Treasures: Automated Classification of faint tidal features in DECaLS Data CXOU J005245.0-722844: Discovery of a be star / white dwarf binary system in the SMC via a very fast, super-eddington X-ray outburst event On the sausage magnetohydrodynamic waves in magnetic flux tubes: finite plasma beta and phase mixing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1