同伴观察促进教师集体效能:教师对同事互访的看法

IF 1.6 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Professional Capital and Community Pub Date : 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1108/jpcc-08-2023-0057
Bethany R. Mather, Jeremy D. Visone
{"title":"同伴观察促进教师集体效能:教师对同事互访的看法","authors":"Bethany R. Mather, Jeremy D. Visone","doi":"10.1108/jpcc-08-2023-0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study explored teachers' perceptions of a specific, collaborative peer observation structure, collegial visits, and collegial visits' connection to collective teacher efficacy (CTE). The research question was: how do teachers perceive collegial visits, particularly with respect to their influence on CTE?</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Within this qualitative descriptive study, 13 K-12 educators from three northeastern USA schools (one urban high school and a suburban middle and elementary school) were interviewed individually and/or in a focus group.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Utilizing social cognitive theory as a framework for analysis, the authors found a theme of a shift from uninformed to informed perceptions of the collective. Results demonstrated that collegial visits foster positive CTE beliefs.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>Since collegial visits were found to increase participants' CTE, a construct others have associated with increased student achievement, school leaders should consider implementing collegial visits as a professional learning structure in their schools after considering their specific context.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Though there has been recent scholarship connecting peer observations and CTE, there has been no research, to date, to examine the effect of the specific structure of collegial visits on CTE.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":44790,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Professional Capital and Community","volume":"211 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peer observation to foster collective teacher efficacy: teachers' perceptions about collegial visits\",\"authors\":\"Bethany R. Mather, Jeremy D. Visone\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jpcc-08-2023-0057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This study explored teachers' perceptions of a specific, collaborative peer observation structure, collegial visits, and collegial visits' connection to collective teacher efficacy (CTE). The research question was: how do teachers perceive collegial visits, particularly with respect to their influence on CTE?</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>Within this qualitative descriptive study, 13 K-12 educators from three northeastern USA schools (one urban high school and a suburban middle and elementary school) were interviewed individually and/or in a focus group.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Utilizing social cognitive theory as a framework for analysis, the authors found a theme of a shift from uninformed to informed perceptions of the collective. Results demonstrated that collegial visits foster positive CTE beliefs.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>Since collegial visits were found to increase participants' CTE, a construct others have associated with increased student achievement, school leaders should consider implementing collegial visits as a professional learning structure in their schools after considering their specific context.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>Though there has been recent scholarship connecting peer observations and CTE, there has been no research, to date, to examine the effect of the specific structure of collegial visits on CTE.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":44790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Professional Capital and Community\",\"volume\":\"211 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Professional Capital and Community\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpcc-08-2023-0057\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Professional Capital and Community","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpcc-08-2023-0057","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究探讨了教师对特定的协作式同伴观察结构、同事互访以及同事互访与教师集体效能(CTE)之间关系的看法。研究问题是:教师如何看待同事互访,尤其是同事互访对 CTE 的影响?在这项定性描述性研究中,来自美国东北部三所学校(一所城市高中和一所郊区初中和小学)的 13 名 K-12 教育工作者接受了个别访谈和/或焦点小组访谈。研究结果作者利用社会认知理论作为分析框架,发现了一个主题,即对集体的看法从不知情转变为知情。研究结果表明,同事互访促进了积极的继续教育信念。实践意义由于发现同事互访提高了参与者的继续教育能力,而这一能力与学生成绩的提高息息相关,因此学校领导应在考虑学校的具体情况后,考虑将同事互访作为一种专业学习结构在学校中实施。原创性/价值虽然最近有学者将同伴观察与继续教育联系起来,但迄今为止还没有研究考察同事互访的具体结构对继续教育的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Peer observation to foster collective teacher efficacy: teachers' perceptions about collegial visits

Purpose

This study explored teachers' perceptions of a specific, collaborative peer observation structure, collegial visits, and collegial visits' connection to collective teacher efficacy (CTE). The research question was: how do teachers perceive collegial visits, particularly with respect to their influence on CTE?

Design/methodology/approach

Within this qualitative descriptive study, 13 K-12 educators from three northeastern USA schools (one urban high school and a suburban middle and elementary school) were interviewed individually and/or in a focus group.

Findings

Utilizing social cognitive theory as a framework for analysis, the authors found a theme of a shift from uninformed to informed perceptions of the collective. Results demonstrated that collegial visits foster positive CTE beliefs.

Practical implications

Since collegial visits were found to increase participants' CTE, a construct others have associated with increased student achievement, school leaders should consider implementing collegial visits as a professional learning structure in their schools after considering their specific context.

Originality/value

Though there has been recent scholarship connecting peer observations and CTE, there has been no research, to date, to examine the effect of the specific structure of collegial visits on CTE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Professional Capital and Community
Journal of Professional Capital and Community EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
A call to adopt pedagogies of optimism in times of armed conflicts: theoretical and practical insights Learning with and from each other: creating safe spaces in a professional community for school leadership development How teachers enhance ICT integration practices within professional learning communities: a qualitative study in Tanzania The unbearable lightness of being implicated in conflict-affected societies: can teachers do anything about it? Educational leadership during a time of war in Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1