接受初级全膝关节置换术的患者中,曾接受过内侧半月板关节镜手术与最差的功能预后无关:一项至少随访 5 年的单中心回顾性研究。

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS SICOT-J Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-18 DOI:10.1051/sicotj/2024001
Vasileios Giovanoulis, Axel Schmidt, Angelo V Vasiliadis, Christos Koutserimpas, Cécile Batailler, Sébastien Lustig, Elvire Servien
{"title":"接受初级全膝关节置换术的患者中,曾接受过内侧半月板关节镜手术与最差的功能预后无关:一项至少随访 5 年的单中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Vasileios Giovanoulis, Axel Schmidt, Angelo V Vasiliadis, Christos Koutserimpas, Cécile Batailler, Sébastien Lustig, Elvire Servien","doi":"10.1051/sicotj/2024001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There have been controversial studies on the impact of prior knee arthroscopy (KA) on outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this comparative study is to investigate the impact of prior KA of medial meniscus on patients undergoing TKA by evaluating the International Knee Society Score (IKS), the complications, and revisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study reviewed 84 patients with TKA who had undergone prior KA of the medial meniscus and compared them to 84 cases, without a history of prior KA as a control group. Outcomes were assessed with the original IKS scores and complications. The mean follow-up was 8 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between groups with respect to demographics, or pre-operative IKS. The mean pre and postoperative IKS was not different between groups. The all-cause reoperation, revision, and complication rates of the KA group were not significantly higher than those of the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study seems to reveal that previous KA of the medial meniscus does not negatively affect a subsequent TKA. Nevertheless, larger studies may be necessary to confirm this observation.</p>","PeriodicalId":46378,"journal":{"name":"SICOT-J","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10798227/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prior medial meniscus arthroscopy is not associated with worst functional outcomes in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective single-center study with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.\",\"authors\":\"Vasileios Giovanoulis, Axel Schmidt, Angelo V Vasiliadis, Christos Koutserimpas, Cécile Batailler, Sébastien Lustig, Elvire Servien\",\"doi\":\"10.1051/sicotj/2024001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There have been controversial studies on the impact of prior knee arthroscopy (KA) on outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this comparative study is to investigate the impact of prior KA of medial meniscus on patients undergoing TKA by evaluating the International Knee Society Score (IKS), the complications, and revisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study reviewed 84 patients with TKA who had undergone prior KA of the medial meniscus and compared them to 84 cases, without a history of prior KA as a control group. Outcomes were assessed with the original IKS scores and complications. The mean follow-up was 8 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between groups with respect to demographics, or pre-operative IKS. The mean pre and postoperative IKS was not different between groups. The all-cause reoperation, revision, and complication rates of the KA group were not significantly higher than those of the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study seems to reveal that previous KA of the medial meniscus does not negatively affect a subsequent TKA. Nevertheless, larger studies may be necessary to confirm this observation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SICOT-J\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10798227/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SICOT-J\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2024001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SICOT-J","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2024001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:关于膝关节镜手术(KA)对全膝关节置换术(TKA)结果的影响,一直存在争议。本对比研究的目的是通过评估国际膝关节学会评分(IKS)、并发症和翻修情况,研究内侧半月板既往KA对TKA患者的影响:这项回顾性研究回顾了 84 名曾接受过内侧半月板 KA 的 TKA 患者,并将其与 84 例无内侧半月板 KA 病史的患者作为对照组进行比较。研究结果以最初的 IKS 评分和并发症进行评估。平均随访时间为 8 年:结果:各组在人口统计学和术前 IKS 方面无明显差异。术前和术后的平均 IKS 在组间无差异。KA组的全因再手术率、翻修率和并发症发生率均未明显高于对照组:本研究似乎揭示了内侧半月板之前的 KA 不会对之后的 TKA 产生负面影响。结论:本研究似乎表明,内侧半月板之前的 KA 不会对随后的 TKA 产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prior medial meniscus arthroscopy is not associated with worst functional outcomes in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective single-center study with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

Introduction: There have been controversial studies on the impact of prior knee arthroscopy (KA) on outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this comparative study is to investigate the impact of prior KA of medial meniscus on patients undergoing TKA by evaluating the International Knee Society Score (IKS), the complications, and revisions.

Methods: This retrospective study reviewed 84 patients with TKA who had undergone prior KA of the medial meniscus and compared them to 84 cases, without a history of prior KA as a control group. Outcomes were assessed with the original IKS scores and complications. The mean follow-up was 8 years.

Results: There was no significant difference between groups with respect to demographics, or pre-operative IKS. The mean pre and postoperative IKS was not different between groups. The all-cause reoperation, revision, and complication rates of the KA group were not significantly higher than those of the control group.

Conclusion: The present study seems to reveal that previous KA of the medial meniscus does not negatively affect a subsequent TKA. Nevertheless, larger studies may be necessary to confirm this observation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SICOT-J
SICOT-J ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Combining inertial navigation with transacetabular ligament in total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach results in excellent accuracy compared to standard manual technique Flexion contracture can cause component mismatch in the Prophecy® preoperative patient-specific instrumentation for Evolution® medial-pivot knee system Vitamin D deficiency in Scheuermann’s disease is associated with increased adverse outcomes Adapting hip arthroplasty practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: Assessing the impact of outpatient care sudden increase on early complications and clinical outcomes. Outcomes of total hip arthroplasty using dual mobility cups following failed internal fixation of proximal femoral fractures at a mean follow-up of 6 years.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1