从水化硅酸盐水泥基粘结剂中提取的碳化水泥浆作为辅助胶凝材料的性能评估

Vineet Shah
{"title":"从水化硅酸盐水泥基粘结剂中提取的碳化水泥浆作为辅助胶凝材料的性能评估","authors":"Vineet Shah","doi":"10.1016/j.cement.2024.100091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The production of concrete has gone up from 2.3 billion m<sup>3</sup> in 2002 to 14 billion m<sup>3</sup> in 2020. At the same time, the amount of construction and demolition waste generated annually has reached levels of 3 billion tons, with concrete rubble making up a major portion of it. This study investigates the performance of carbonated fines derived from hydrated cement paste of different binders. Four cement paste blends, containing Portland cement (PC) and blends of Portland cement with fly ash (FA30), perlite (PL30) and metakaolin (MK30) at a 30 % cement replacement level, were cured for 90 days prior to subjecting them to a carbonation reaction. The R<sup>3</sup> test gauged pozzolanic reactivity, while calorimetry, XRD, and TGA studied hydration characteristics. Compressive strength of mortar samples prepared using the same binder composition as paste was also measured at different ages. Carbonated fines exhibited notable pozzolanic activity compared to waste hydrated cement paste. The reactivity of carbonated fines derived from different binders were similar, however slightly higher reactivity was measured for fines comprising of reactive SCM in the precursor material (hydrated paste). Mixes with carbonated fines demonstrated enhanced kinetics, exhibiting over 25 % higher compressive strength at 3 and 7 days compared to the fly ash control mix. Similar compressive strength characteristics were observed in mortar mixes with different carbonated fines, indicating a limited impact of the various binder types from which the fines originated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100225,"journal":{"name":"CEMENT","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100091"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266654922400001X/pdfft?md5=11bac3d514ac9d5c852eb24f0b260128&pid=1-s2.0-S266654922400001X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation of carbonated cement paste derived from hydrated Portland cement based binders as supplementary cementitious material\",\"authors\":\"Vineet Shah\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cement.2024.100091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The production of concrete has gone up from 2.3 billion m<sup>3</sup> in 2002 to 14 billion m<sup>3</sup> in 2020. At the same time, the amount of construction and demolition waste generated annually has reached levels of 3 billion tons, with concrete rubble making up a major portion of it. This study investigates the performance of carbonated fines derived from hydrated cement paste of different binders. Four cement paste blends, containing Portland cement (PC) and blends of Portland cement with fly ash (FA30), perlite (PL30) and metakaolin (MK30) at a 30 % cement replacement level, were cured for 90 days prior to subjecting them to a carbonation reaction. The R<sup>3</sup> test gauged pozzolanic reactivity, while calorimetry, XRD, and TGA studied hydration characteristics. Compressive strength of mortar samples prepared using the same binder composition as paste was also measured at different ages. Carbonated fines exhibited notable pozzolanic activity compared to waste hydrated cement paste. The reactivity of carbonated fines derived from different binders were similar, however slightly higher reactivity was measured for fines comprising of reactive SCM in the precursor material (hydrated paste). Mixes with carbonated fines demonstrated enhanced kinetics, exhibiting over 25 % higher compressive strength at 3 and 7 days compared to the fly ash control mix. Similar compressive strength characteristics were observed in mortar mixes with different carbonated fines, indicating a limited impact of the various binder types from which the fines originated.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CEMENT\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100091\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266654922400001X/pdfft?md5=11bac3d514ac9d5c852eb24f0b260128&pid=1-s2.0-S266654922400001X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CEMENT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266654922400001X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266654922400001X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

混凝土产量已从 2002 年的 23 亿立方米增至 2020 年的 140 亿立方米。与此同时,每年产生的建筑和拆除废料已达 30 亿吨,其中混凝土碎石占了很大一部分。本研究调查了由不同粘结剂的水化水泥浆提取的碳化细粉的性能。在对含有硅酸盐水泥(PC)和硅酸盐水泥与粉煤灰(FA30)、珍珠岩(PL30)和偏高岭土(MK30)的混合物(水泥替代率为 30%)的四种水泥浆混合物进行碳化反应之前,先将其养护 90 天。R3 试验测定了水泥反应性,而量热仪、X 射线衍射和热重分析则研究了水化特性。此外,还测量了使用与浆糊相同的粘结剂成分制备的砂浆样品在不同龄期的抗压强度。与废弃的水合水泥浆相比,碳化细粉具有显著的水合活性。从不同粘结剂中提取的碳化细粉的反应活性相似,但前驱体材料(水合水泥浆)中含有活性单体材料的细粉的反应活性略高。含有碳化细粉的混合料显示出更强的动力学性能,与粉煤灰对照混合料相比,3 天和 7 天的抗压强度高出 25%。在含有不同碳化细粉的砂浆混合料中也观察到了类似的抗压强度特征,这表明细粉来源的各种粘结剂类型的影响有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance evaluation of carbonated cement paste derived from hydrated Portland cement based binders as supplementary cementitious material

The production of concrete has gone up from 2.3 billion m3 in 2002 to 14 billion m3 in 2020. At the same time, the amount of construction and demolition waste generated annually has reached levels of 3 billion tons, with concrete rubble making up a major portion of it. This study investigates the performance of carbonated fines derived from hydrated cement paste of different binders. Four cement paste blends, containing Portland cement (PC) and blends of Portland cement with fly ash (FA30), perlite (PL30) and metakaolin (MK30) at a 30 % cement replacement level, were cured for 90 days prior to subjecting them to a carbonation reaction. The R3 test gauged pozzolanic reactivity, while calorimetry, XRD, and TGA studied hydration characteristics. Compressive strength of mortar samples prepared using the same binder composition as paste was also measured at different ages. Carbonated fines exhibited notable pozzolanic activity compared to waste hydrated cement paste. The reactivity of carbonated fines derived from different binders were similar, however slightly higher reactivity was measured for fines comprising of reactive SCM in the precursor material (hydrated paste). Mixes with carbonated fines demonstrated enhanced kinetics, exhibiting over 25 % higher compressive strength at 3 and 7 days compared to the fly ash control mix. Similar compressive strength characteristics were observed in mortar mixes with different carbonated fines, indicating a limited impact of the various binder types from which the fines originated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Downstream processing of End-of-Life concrete for the recovery of high-quality cementitious fractions The impact of relative humidity on the nanoindentation relaxation in calcium silicate hydrates Low-grade fly ash in portland cement blends: A decoupling approach to evaluate reactivity and hydration effects Accelerating effect of low replacements of carbonaceous materials in cement paste and mortar Measuring concrete air-entraining admixture adsorption on coal ash using three-phase equilibrium and fluorescence-based methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1