{"title":"时隔多年:澄清误解,为约翰逊类型学的下一个 25 年指明方向","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s10896-023-00669-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>In 1995, Michael P. Johnson published work proposing there were multiple types of intimate partner violence, and types differed in their causes, characteristics, and outcomes. As more than a quarter century has passed, this special issue brings together reviews of and reflections on work related to the typology that has already been done and includes new empirical and theoretical works to open the next quarter century. This introduction details the purpose and process that led to this special issue, summarizes what we see as the contributions of this issue, and ends by looking ahead to what work still needs to be done. In doing so, we implore scholars to take care in their methodological and conceptual operationalizations of the typology and expand the work to previously understudied populations, as well as explore the implications of the typology for policy and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":48180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Violence","volume":"43 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"After All This Time: Clarifying Misconceptions and Charting Clear Directions for the Next 25 Years of Johnson’s Typology\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10896-023-00669-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>In 1995, Michael P. Johnson published work proposing there were multiple types of intimate partner violence, and types differed in their causes, characteristics, and outcomes. As more than a quarter century has passed, this special issue brings together reviews of and reflections on work related to the typology that has already been done and includes new empirical and theoretical works to open the next quarter century. This introduction details the purpose and process that led to this special issue, summarizes what we see as the contributions of this issue, and ends by looking ahead to what work still needs to be done. In doing so, we implore scholars to take care in their methodological and conceptual operationalizations of the typology and expand the work to previously understudied populations, as well as explore the implications of the typology for policy and practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Violence\",\"volume\":\"43 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Violence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-023-00669-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-023-00669-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要 1995 年,迈克尔-约翰逊(Michael P. Johnson)发表文章,提出亲密伴侣暴力有多种类型,不同类型的暴力在起因、特征和结果上各不相同。四分之一世纪过去了,本特刊汇集了对已完成的与类型学相关的工作的回顾和反思,并收录了新的经验和理论著作,以开启下一个四分之一世纪。本导言详细介绍了本特刊的目的和编写过程,总结了我们认为本特刊的贡献,并在最后展望了仍需完成的工作。在此过程中,我们恳请学者们在方法和概念上谨慎操作该类型学,将工作扩展到以前未被充分研究的人群,并探索该类型学对政策和实践的影响。
After All This Time: Clarifying Misconceptions and Charting Clear Directions for the Next 25 Years of Johnson’s Typology
Abstract
In 1995, Michael P. Johnson published work proposing there were multiple types of intimate partner violence, and types differed in their causes, characteristics, and outcomes. As more than a quarter century has passed, this special issue brings together reviews of and reflections on work related to the typology that has already been done and includes new empirical and theoretical works to open the next quarter century. This introduction details the purpose and process that led to this special issue, summarizes what we see as the contributions of this issue, and ends by looking ahead to what work still needs to be done. In doing so, we implore scholars to take care in their methodological and conceptual operationalizations of the typology and expand the work to previously understudied populations, as well as explore the implications of the typology for policy and practice.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Family Violence (JOFV) is a peer-reviewed publication committed to the dissemination of rigorous research on preventing, ending, and ameliorating all forms of family violence. JOFV welcomes scholarly articles related to the broad categories of child abuse and maltreatment, dating violence, domestic and partner violence, and elder abuse. Within these categories, JOFV emphasizes research on physical violence, psychological violence, sexual violence, and homicides that occur in families. Studies on families in all their various forms and diversities are welcome. JOFV publishes studies using quantitative, qualitative, and/or mixed methods involving the collection of primary data. Rigorous systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and theoretical analyses are also welcome. To help advance scientific understandings of family violence, JOFV is especially interested in research using transdisciplinary perspectives and innovative research methods. Because family violence is a global problem requiring solutions from diverse disciplinary perspectives, JOFV strongly encourages submissions from scholars worldwide from all disciplines and backgrounds.