阿根廷上大西洋森林的造林放牧系统:哪类农场采用这种系统,如何采用?

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Agroforestry Systems Pub Date : 2024-01-17 DOI:10.1007/s10457-023-00944-x
C. C. Gelabert, N. I. Gasparri, S. E. de Bargas, D. H. Chifarelli, T. N. Rojas, P. M. Mac Donagh, G. A. Zurita
{"title":"阿根廷上大西洋森林的造林放牧系统:哪类农场采用这种系统,如何采用?","authors":"C. C. Gelabert, N. I. Gasparri, S. E. de Bargas, D. H. Chifarelli, T. N. Rojas, P. M. Mac Donagh, G. A. Zurita","doi":"10.1007/s10457-023-00944-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite silvopastoral systems’ environmental and production benefits, their adoption in forest ecosystems has been moderated. Identifying a silvopastoral farm typology combining farm size and management practices can help explore the constraints to their adoption and guide technical support initiatives. We investigated farms adopting silvopastoral systems in the Upper Atlantic Forest of Argentina and whether their management practices are related to the farms structural characteristics. We analysed 60 surveys that covered 3428 ha under silvopastoral management. First, we group the farms according to size and land use using the factor analysis mixed data and group with hierarchical clustering. Second, we performed two correspondence analyses with variables related to management practices in the silvopastoral area to explore the relationship between the practice management adopted and the cluster farm. Our results summarised the variability of farms and management practices in three groups: Specialist silvopastoral farms, Agricultural farms with silvopastoral management and forest plantation, and Livestock farms with silvopastoral management sectors. Specialist silvopastoral farms adopted most of the technical recommendations for this land use. Despite this work contributions, some information gaps still need to be addressed to have an integrated vision of how silvopastoral systems in the Upper Atlantic Forest of Argentina can be adopted in an extended manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Silvopastoral systems in the Upper Atlantic Forest of Argentina: what type of farms adopt them and how?\",\"authors\":\"C. C. Gelabert, N. I. Gasparri, S. E. de Bargas, D. H. Chifarelli, T. N. Rojas, P. M. Mac Donagh, G. A. Zurita\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10457-023-00944-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Despite silvopastoral systems’ environmental and production benefits, their adoption in forest ecosystems has been moderated. Identifying a silvopastoral farm typology combining farm size and management practices can help explore the constraints to their adoption and guide technical support initiatives. We investigated farms adopting silvopastoral systems in the Upper Atlantic Forest of Argentina and whether their management practices are related to the farms structural characteristics. We analysed 60 surveys that covered 3428 ha under silvopastoral management. First, we group the farms according to size and land use using the factor analysis mixed data and group with hierarchical clustering. Second, we performed two correspondence analyses with variables related to management practices in the silvopastoral area to explore the relationship between the practice management adopted and the cluster farm. Our results summarised the variability of farms and management practices in three groups: Specialist silvopastoral farms, Agricultural farms with silvopastoral management and forest plantation, and Livestock farms with silvopastoral management sectors. Specialist silvopastoral farms adopted most of the technical recommendations for this land use. Despite this work contributions, some information gaps still need to be addressed to have an integrated vision of how silvopastoral systems in the Upper Atlantic Forest of Argentina can be adopted in an extended manner.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agroforestry Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agroforestry Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00944-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00944-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管林牧系统具有环境和生产效益,但其在森林生态系统中的应用程度却不高。结合农场规模和管理实践确定造林牧业农场类型,有助于探索采用造林牧业系统的制约因素,并为技术支持措施提供指导。我们调查了阿根廷上大西洋森林采用林牧系统的农场,以及它们的管理方法是否与农场的结构特征有关。我们分析了 60 项调查,涉及 3428 公顷的林牧管理面积。首先,我们根据农场的规模和土地使用情况,采用因子分析混合数据和分层聚类的方法对农场进行分组。其次,我们对与林牧区管理方法相关的变量进行了两次对应分析,以探讨所采用的管理方法与聚类农场之间的关系。我们的结果将农场和管理方法的差异性归纳为三组:专业造林牧业农场、造林牧业管理和森林种植的农业农场以及造林牧业管理部门的畜牧业农场。专业林牧农场采纳了针对该土地用途的大部分技术建议。尽管这项工作做出了贡献,但仍需填补一些信息空白,以便对如何在阿根廷大西洋上游森林中推广采用林牧系统有一个全面的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Silvopastoral systems in the Upper Atlantic Forest of Argentina: what type of farms adopt them and how?

Despite silvopastoral systems’ environmental and production benefits, their adoption in forest ecosystems has been moderated. Identifying a silvopastoral farm typology combining farm size and management practices can help explore the constraints to their adoption and guide technical support initiatives. We investigated farms adopting silvopastoral systems in the Upper Atlantic Forest of Argentina and whether their management practices are related to the farms structural characteristics. We analysed 60 surveys that covered 3428 ha under silvopastoral management. First, we group the farms according to size and land use using the factor analysis mixed data and group with hierarchical clustering. Second, we performed two correspondence analyses with variables related to management practices in the silvopastoral area to explore the relationship between the practice management adopted and the cluster farm. Our results summarised the variability of farms and management practices in three groups: Specialist silvopastoral farms, Agricultural farms with silvopastoral management and forest plantation, and Livestock farms with silvopastoral management sectors. Specialist silvopastoral farms adopted most of the technical recommendations for this land use. Despite this work contributions, some information gaps still need to be addressed to have an integrated vision of how silvopastoral systems in the Upper Atlantic Forest of Argentina can be adopted in an extended manner.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry Systems 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base
期刊最新文献
Improving the precision of estimating carbon sequestration potential in four tree and shrub agroforestry species through the comparison of general and specific allometric equations in Côte d’Ivoire Soil quality indicators under five different cacao production systems and fallow in Alto Beni, Bolivia Variables related to soil fertility in successional agroforestry systems: Serras do Sudeste, RS, Brazil Growth of two loblolly pine clones planted in agroforestry and plantation settings: nine-year results The ties that bind: how trees can enhance agroecological transitions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1