新生儿重症监护室的姑息治疗:对预期损失中不确定性的进化概念分析》。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Advances in Neonatal Care Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1097/ANC.0000000000001143
Kathryn Lenington, Katherine M Dudding, Pariya L Fazeli, Tracey Dick, Patricia Patrician
{"title":"新生儿重症监护室的姑息治疗:对预期损失中不确定性的进化概念分析》。","authors":"Kathryn Lenington, Katherine M Dudding, Pariya L Fazeli, Tracey Dick, Patricia Patrician","doi":"10.1097/ANC.0000000000001143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the concepts of uncertainty and anticipated loss have been explored in a variety of contexts, advances in genetic testing and life-sustaining technology rendered changes in the care of medically complex infants. The separate concepts no longer have the descriptive power to clarify new phenomena endured by parents in the changing neonatal landscape. A current concept analysis examining uncertainty in anticipated loss is necessary to generate knowledge concurrently with deviations observed in the neonatal intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the concept of uncertainty in anticipated loss among parents of infants with genetic disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Rodgers' method of concept analysis, the concept was named, surrogate terms, antecedents, attributes, and consequences were identified from the literature, and a model case was constructed. The databases CINAHL, PubMed, and PsycINFO were used to conduct the literature search.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen articles provided the data for this analysis. Uncertainty in anticipated loss is a complex, nonlinear, and multifaceted experience anteceded by an ultimately terminal diagnosis, an ambiguous prognosis, and a lack of clear knowledge to guide treatment. Its attributes include a loss of control, assumptive world remodeling, role/identity confusion, and prolonged emotional complexity that consequently leads to a cyclical pattern of positive and negative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>This newly defined concept empowers neonatal nurses to provide care that includes a holistic understanding of the experience of uncertainty in anticipated loss . Nurses are ideally positioned and have the responsibility to utilize this concept to become better advocates for infants and facilitators of parental wellness.</p>","PeriodicalId":48862,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Neonatal Care","volume":" ","pages":"187-194"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Palliative Care in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis of Uncertainty in Anticipated Loss.\",\"authors\":\"Kathryn Lenington, Katherine M Dudding, Pariya L Fazeli, Tracey Dick, Patricia Patrician\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ANC.0000000000001143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the concepts of uncertainty and anticipated loss have been explored in a variety of contexts, advances in genetic testing and life-sustaining technology rendered changes in the care of medically complex infants. The separate concepts no longer have the descriptive power to clarify new phenomena endured by parents in the changing neonatal landscape. A current concept analysis examining uncertainty in anticipated loss is necessary to generate knowledge concurrently with deviations observed in the neonatal intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the concept of uncertainty in anticipated loss among parents of infants with genetic disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Rodgers' method of concept analysis, the concept was named, surrogate terms, antecedents, attributes, and consequences were identified from the literature, and a model case was constructed. The databases CINAHL, PubMed, and PsycINFO were used to conduct the literature search.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen articles provided the data for this analysis. Uncertainty in anticipated loss is a complex, nonlinear, and multifaceted experience anteceded by an ultimately terminal diagnosis, an ambiguous prognosis, and a lack of clear knowledge to guide treatment. Its attributes include a loss of control, assumptive world remodeling, role/identity confusion, and prolonged emotional complexity that consequently leads to a cyclical pattern of positive and negative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>This newly defined concept empowers neonatal nurses to provide care that includes a holistic understanding of the experience of uncertainty in anticipated loss . Nurses are ideally positioned and have the responsibility to utilize this concept to become better advocates for infants and facilitators of parental wellness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Neonatal Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"187-194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Neonatal Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000001143\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Neonatal Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000001143","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管不确定性和预期损失的概念已在各种情况下进行过探讨,但基因检测和生命维持技术的进步使复杂病理婴儿的护理发生了变化。在不断变化的新生儿环境中,这两个独立的概念已不再具有描述力来澄清父母所承受的新现象。目前有必要对预期损失的不确定性进行概念分析,以便在新生儿重症监护室观察到偏差的同时产生知识。目的:探讨遗传性疾病婴儿父母对预期损失的不确定性的概念:按照罗杰斯(Rodgers)的概念分析方法,对概念进行命名,从文献中确定代用术语、前因、属性和后果,并构建模型案例。文献检索使用了 CINAHL、PubMed 和 PsycINFO 数据库:结果:15 篇文章为本分析提供了数据。预期损失的不确定性是一种复杂的、非线性的和多方面的体验,其先兆是最终的终末诊断、不明确的预后以及缺乏明确的知识来指导治疗。其特征包括失控、假定世界重塑、角色/身份混乱以及长期的情绪复杂性,从而导致积极和消极结果的循环模式:这个新定义的概念赋予新生儿护士提供护理的能力,包括对预期损失中不确定性体验的整体理解。护士们处于理想的位置,有责任利用这一概念成为婴儿更好的代言人和父母健康的促进者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Palliative Care in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis of Uncertainty in Anticipated Loss.

Background: Although the concepts of uncertainty and anticipated loss have been explored in a variety of contexts, advances in genetic testing and life-sustaining technology rendered changes in the care of medically complex infants. The separate concepts no longer have the descriptive power to clarify new phenomena endured by parents in the changing neonatal landscape. A current concept analysis examining uncertainty in anticipated loss is necessary to generate knowledge concurrently with deviations observed in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Purpose: To explore the concept of uncertainty in anticipated loss among parents of infants with genetic disorders.

Methods: Following Rodgers' method of concept analysis, the concept was named, surrogate terms, antecedents, attributes, and consequences were identified from the literature, and a model case was constructed. The databases CINAHL, PubMed, and PsycINFO were used to conduct the literature search.

Results: Fifteen articles provided the data for this analysis. Uncertainty in anticipated loss is a complex, nonlinear, and multifaceted experience anteceded by an ultimately terminal diagnosis, an ambiguous prognosis, and a lack of clear knowledge to guide treatment. Its attributes include a loss of control, assumptive world remodeling, role/identity confusion, and prolonged emotional complexity that consequently leads to a cyclical pattern of positive and negative outcomes.

Implications: This newly defined concept empowers neonatal nurses to provide care that includes a holistic understanding of the experience of uncertainty in anticipated loss . Nurses are ideally positioned and have the responsibility to utilize this concept to become better advocates for infants and facilitators of parental wellness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Advances in Neonatal Care takes a unique and dynamic approach to the original research and clinical practice articles it publishes. Addressing the practice challenges faced every day—caring for the 40,000-plus low-birth-weight infants in Level II and Level III NICUs each year—the journal promotes evidence-based care and improved outcomes for the tiniest patients and their families. Peer-reviewed editorial includes unique and detailed visual and teaching aids, such as Family Teaching Toolbox, Research to Practice, Cultivating Clinical Expertise, and Online Features. Each issue offers Continuing Education (CE) articles in both print and online formats.
期刊最新文献
Attitudes and Experiences Among Swedish NICU Nurses Regarding Skin-to-Skin Care of Infants Born at 22-23 Weeks of Gestation. Eyedealistic Vision: Optimizing Oxygenation to Reduce Severe Retinopathy of Prematurity in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. The Impact of Pandemic-Induced Separation and Visitation Restrictions on the Maternal-Infant Dyad in Neonatal Units: A Systematic Review. The Role of Neonatal Nurse Practitioners in the Implementation of a Bedside Point-of-Care Ultrasound Program. Initial Development of the Nurse Perception of Infant Condition (NPIC) Scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1