{"title":"磁梯度尺度长度解释了为什么某些等离子体需要紧密的外部磁线圈","authors":"John Kappel, Matt Landreman, Dhairya Malhotra","doi":"10.1088/1361-6587/ad1a3e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The separation between the last closed flux surface of a plasma and the external coils that magnetically confine it is a limiting factor in the construction of fusion-capable plasma devices. This plasma-coil separation must be large enough so that components such as a breeding blanket and neutron shielding can fit between the plasma and the coils. Plasma-coil separation affects reactor size, engineering complexity, and particle loss due to field ripple. For some plasmas it can be difficult to produce the desired flux surface shaping with distant coils, and for other plasmas it is infeasible altogether. Here, we seek to understand the underlying physics that limits plasma-coil separation and explain why some configurations require close external coils. In this paper, we explore the hypothesis that the limiting plasma-coil separation is set by the shortest scale length of the magnetic field as expressed by the <inline-formula>\n<tex-math><?CDATA $\\nabla \\mathbf{B}$?></tex-math>\n<mml:math overflow=\"scroll\"><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">∇</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant=\"bold\">B</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>\n<inline-graphic xlink:href=\"ppcfad1a3eieqn1.gif\" xlink:type=\"simple\"></inline-graphic>\n</inline-formula> tensor. We tested this hypothesis on a database of <inline-formula>\n<tex-math><?CDATA $\\gt$?></tex-math>\n<mml:math overflow=\"scroll\"><mml:mo>></mml:mo></mml:math>\n<inline-graphic xlink:href=\"ppcfad1a3eieqn2.gif\" xlink:type=\"simple\"></inline-graphic>\n</inline-formula>40 stellarator and tokamak configurations. Within this database, the coil-to-plasma distance compared to the minor radius varies by over an order of magnitude. The magnetic scale length is well correlated to the coil-to-plasma distance of actual coil designs generated using the <monospace>REGCOIL</monospace> method (Landreman 2017 <italic toggle=\"yes\">Nucl. Fusion</italic>\n<bold>57</bold> 046003). Additionally, this correlation reveals a general trend that larger plasma-coil separation is possible with a small number of field periods.","PeriodicalId":20239,"journal":{"name":"Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The magnetic gradient scale length explains why certain plasmas require close external magnetic coils\",\"authors\":\"John Kappel, Matt Landreman, Dhairya Malhotra\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6587/ad1a3e\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The separation between the last closed flux surface of a plasma and the external coils that magnetically confine it is a limiting factor in the construction of fusion-capable plasma devices. This plasma-coil separation must be large enough so that components such as a breeding blanket and neutron shielding can fit between the plasma and the coils. Plasma-coil separation affects reactor size, engineering complexity, and particle loss due to field ripple. For some plasmas it can be difficult to produce the desired flux surface shaping with distant coils, and for other plasmas it is infeasible altogether. Here, we seek to understand the underlying physics that limits plasma-coil separation and explain why some configurations require close external coils. In this paper, we explore the hypothesis that the limiting plasma-coil separation is set by the shortest scale length of the magnetic field as expressed by the <inline-formula>\\n<tex-math><?CDATA $\\\\nabla \\\\mathbf{B}$?></tex-math>\\n<mml:math overflow=\\\"scroll\\\"><mml:mi mathvariant=\\\"normal\\\">∇</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant=\\\"bold\\\">B</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>\\n<inline-graphic xlink:href=\\\"ppcfad1a3eieqn1.gif\\\" xlink:type=\\\"simple\\\"></inline-graphic>\\n</inline-formula> tensor. We tested this hypothesis on a database of <inline-formula>\\n<tex-math><?CDATA $\\\\gt$?></tex-math>\\n<mml:math overflow=\\\"scroll\\\"><mml:mo>></mml:mo></mml:math>\\n<inline-graphic xlink:href=\\\"ppcfad1a3eieqn2.gif\\\" xlink:type=\\\"simple\\\"></inline-graphic>\\n</inline-formula>40 stellarator and tokamak configurations. Within this database, the coil-to-plasma distance compared to the minor radius varies by over an order of magnitude. The magnetic scale length is well correlated to the coil-to-plasma distance of actual coil designs generated using the <monospace>REGCOIL</monospace> method (Landreman 2017 <italic toggle=\\\"yes\\\">Nucl. Fusion</italic>\\n<bold>57</bold> 046003). Additionally, this correlation reveals a general trend that larger plasma-coil separation is possible with a small number of field periods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/ad1a3e\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, FLUIDS & PLASMAS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/ad1a3e","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, FLUIDS & PLASMAS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The magnetic gradient scale length explains why certain plasmas require close external magnetic coils
The separation between the last closed flux surface of a plasma and the external coils that magnetically confine it is a limiting factor in the construction of fusion-capable plasma devices. This plasma-coil separation must be large enough so that components such as a breeding blanket and neutron shielding can fit between the plasma and the coils. Plasma-coil separation affects reactor size, engineering complexity, and particle loss due to field ripple. For some plasmas it can be difficult to produce the desired flux surface shaping with distant coils, and for other plasmas it is infeasible altogether. Here, we seek to understand the underlying physics that limits plasma-coil separation and explain why some configurations require close external coils. In this paper, we explore the hypothesis that the limiting plasma-coil separation is set by the shortest scale length of the magnetic field as expressed by the ∇B tensor. We tested this hypothesis on a database of >40 stellarator and tokamak configurations. Within this database, the coil-to-plasma distance compared to the minor radius varies by over an order of magnitude. The magnetic scale length is well correlated to the coil-to-plasma distance of actual coil designs generated using the REGCOIL method (Landreman 2017 Nucl. Fusion57 046003). Additionally, this correlation reveals a general trend that larger plasma-coil separation is possible with a small number of field periods.
期刊介绍:
Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion covers all aspects of the physics of hot, highly ionised plasmas. This includes results of current experimental and theoretical research on all aspects of the physics of high-temperature plasmas and of controlled nuclear fusion, including the basic phenomena in highly-ionised gases in the laboratory, in the ionosphere and in space, in magnetic-confinement and inertial-confinement fusion as well as related diagnostic methods.
Papers with a technological emphasis, for example in such topics as plasma control, fusion technology and diagnostics, are welcomed when the plasma physics is an integral part of the paper or when the technology is unique to plasma applications or new to the field of plasma physics. Papers on dusty plasma physics are welcome when there is a clear relevance to fusion.