磁梯度尺度长度解释了为什么某些等离子体需要紧密的外部磁线圈

IF 2.1 2区 物理与天体物理 Q2 PHYSICS, FLUIDS & PLASMAS Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion Pub Date : 2024-01-18 DOI:10.1088/1361-6587/ad1a3e
John Kappel, Matt Landreman, Dhairya Malhotra
{"title":"磁梯度尺度长度解释了为什么某些等离子体需要紧密的外部磁线圈","authors":"John Kappel, Matt Landreman, Dhairya Malhotra","doi":"10.1088/1361-6587/ad1a3e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The separation between the last closed flux surface of a plasma and the external coils that magnetically confine it is a limiting factor in the construction of fusion-capable plasma devices. This plasma-coil separation must be large enough so that components such as a breeding blanket and neutron shielding can fit between the plasma and the coils. Plasma-coil separation affects reactor size, engineering complexity, and particle loss due to field ripple. For some plasmas it can be difficult to produce the desired flux surface shaping with distant coils, and for other plasmas it is infeasible altogether. Here, we seek to understand the underlying physics that limits plasma-coil separation and explain why some configurations require close external coils. In this paper, we explore the hypothesis that the limiting plasma-coil separation is set by the shortest scale length of the magnetic field as expressed by the <inline-formula>\n<tex-math><?CDATA $\\nabla \\mathbf{B}$?></tex-math>\n<mml:math overflow=\"scroll\"><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">∇</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant=\"bold\">B</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>\n<inline-graphic xlink:href=\"ppcfad1a3eieqn1.gif\" xlink:type=\"simple\"></inline-graphic>\n</inline-formula> tensor. We tested this hypothesis on a database of <inline-formula>\n<tex-math><?CDATA $\\gt$?></tex-math>\n<mml:math overflow=\"scroll\"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math>\n<inline-graphic xlink:href=\"ppcfad1a3eieqn2.gif\" xlink:type=\"simple\"></inline-graphic>\n</inline-formula>40 stellarator and tokamak configurations. Within this database, the coil-to-plasma distance compared to the minor radius varies by over an order of magnitude. The magnetic scale length is well correlated to the coil-to-plasma distance of actual coil designs generated using the <monospace>REGCOIL</monospace> method (Landreman 2017 <italic toggle=\"yes\">Nucl. Fusion</italic>\n<bold>57</bold> 046003). Additionally, this correlation reveals a general trend that larger plasma-coil separation is possible with a small number of field periods.","PeriodicalId":20239,"journal":{"name":"Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The magnetic gradient scale length explains why certain plasmas require close external magnetic coils\",\"authors\":\"John Kappel, Matt Landreman, Dhairya Malhotra\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6587/ad1a3e\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The separation between the last closed flux surface of a plasma and the external coils that magnetically confine it is a limiting factor in the construction of fusion-capable plasma devices. This plasma-coil separation must be large enough so that components such as a breeding blanket and neutron shielding can fit between the plasma and the coils. Plasma-coil separation affects reactor size, engineering complexity, and particle loss due to field ripple. For some plasmas it can be difficult to produce the desired flux surface shaping with distant coils, and for other plasmas it is infeasible altogether. Here, we seek to understand the underlying physics that limits plasma-coil separation and explain why some configurations require close external coils. In this paper, we explore the hypothesis that the limiting plasma-coil separation is set by the shortest scale length of the magnetic field as expressed by the <inline-formula>\\n<tex-math><?CDATA $\\\\nabla \\\\mathbf{B}$?></tex-math>\\n<mml:math overflow=\\\"scroll\\\"><mml:mi mathvariant=\\\"normal\\\">∇</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant=\\\"bold\\\">B</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>\\n<inline-graphic xlink:href=\\\"ppcfad1a3eieqn1.gif\\\" xlink:type=\\\"simple\\\"></inline-graphic>\\n</inline-formula> tensor. We tested this hypothesis on a database of <inline-formula>\\n<tex-math><?CDATA $\\\\gt$?></tex-math>\\n<mml:math overflow=\\\"scroll\\\"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math>\\n<inline-graphic xlink:href=\\\"ppcfad1a3eieqn2.gif\\\" xlink:type=\\\"simple\\\"></inline-graphic>\\n</inline-formula>40 stellarator and tokamak configurations. Within this database, the coil-to-plasma distance compared to the minor radius varies by over an order of magnitude. The magnetic scale length is well correlated to the coil-to-plasma distance of actual coil designs generated using the <monospace>REGCOIL</monospace> method (Landreman 2017 <italic toggle=\\\"yes\\\">Nucl. Fusion</italic>\\n<bold>57</bold> 046003). Additionally, this correlation reveals a general trend that larger plasma-coil separation is possible with a small number of field periods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/ad1a3e\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, FLUIDS & PLASMAS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/ad1a3e","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, FLUIDS & PLASMAS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

等离子体的最后一个封闭通量面与对其进行磁约束的外部线圈之间的间隔是建造可进行聚变的等离子体设备的一个限制因素。等离子体与线圈之间的间隔必须足够大,以便等离子体与线圈之间能够容纳孕育毯和中子屏蔽等组件。等离子体与线圈的分离会影响反应堆的尺寸、工程复杂性以及场纹波造成的粒子损失。对于某些等离子体,很难通过远距离线圈产生所需的通量面形状,而对于其他等离子体,则完全不可行。在此,我们试图了解限制等离子体-线圈分离的基本物理原理,并解释为什么某些配置需要较近的外部线圈。在本文中,我们探讨了一个假设,即等离子体-线圈分离的极限是由∇B 张量表示的磁场最短尺度长度设定的。我们在一个包含 40 种恒星器和托卡马克配置的数据库中测试了这一假设。在这个数据库中,线圈到等离子体的距离与小半径相比相差一个数量级以上。磁尺度长度与使用 REGCOIL 方法生成的实际线圈设计的线圈到等离子体距离密切相关(Landreman 2017 Nucl. Fusion57 046003)。此外,这种相关性还揭示了一种总体趋势,即使用较少的磁场周期就可以实现较大的等离子体-线圈分离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The magnetic gradient scale length explains why certain plasmas require close external magnetic coils
The separation between the last closed flux surface of a plasma and the external coils that magnetically confine it is a limiting factor in the construction of fusion-capable plasma devices. This plasma-coil separation must be large enough so that components such as a breeding blanket and neutron shielding can fit between the plasma and the coils. Plasma-coil separation affects reactor size, engineering complexity, and particle loss due to field ripple. For some plasmas it can be difficult to produce the desired flux surface shaping with distant coils, and for other plasmas it is infeasible altogether. Here, we seek to understand the underlying physics that limits plasma-coil separation and explain why some configurations require close external coils. In this paper, we explore the hypothesis that the limiting plasma-coil separation is set by the shortest scale length of the magnetic field as expressed by the B tensor. We tested this hypothesis on a database of > 40 stellarator and tokamak configurations. Within this database, the coil-to-plasma distance compared to the minor radius varies by over an order of magnitude. The magnetic scale length is well correlated to the coil-to-plasma distance of actual coil designs generated using the REGCOIL method (Landreman 2017 Nucl. Fusion 57 046003). Additionally, this correlation reveals a general trend that larger plasma-coil separation is possible with a small number of field periods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion
Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 物理-物理:核物理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
13.60%
发文量
224
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion covers all aspects of the physics of hot, highly ionised plasmas. This includes results of current experimental and theoretical research on all aspects of the physics of high-temperature plasmas and of controlled nuclear fusion, including the basic phenomena in highly-ionised gases in the laboratory, in the ionosphere and in space, in magnetic-confinement and inertial-confinement fusion as well as related diagnostic methods. Papers with a technological emphasis, for example in such topics as plasma control, fusion technology and diagnostics, are welcomed when the plasma physics is an integral part of the paper or when the technology is unique to plasma applications or new to the field of plasma physics. Papers on dusty plasma physics are welcome when there is a clear relevance to fusion.
期刊最新文献
Reduced order modeling for real-time monitoring of structural displacements due to electromagnetic forces in large scale tokamaks He II line intensity measurements in the JET tokamak Sheath constraints on turbulent magnetised plasmas Vertical instability forecasting and controllability assessment of multi-device tokamak plasmas in DECAF with data-driven optimization Identifying L-H transition in HL-2A through deep learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1