探索带活动假牙生活的体验--定性文献范围综述。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Gerodontology Pub Date : 2024-01-21 DOI:10.1111/ger.12735
T Broomhead, SR Baker, N Martin, G McKenna, B El-Dhuwaib, A Alavi, B Gibson
{"title":"探索带活动假牙生活的体验--定性文献范围综述。","authors":"T Broomhead,&nbsp;SR Baker,&nbsp;N Martin,&nbsp;G McKenna,&nbsp;B El-Dhuwaib,&nbsp;A Alavi,&nbsp;B Gibson","doi":"10.1111/ger.12735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Examine the literature on the experiences of living with removable dentures (complete or partial) to identify any gaps and provide a map for future research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Increasing proportions of society are living partially dentate with some form of restoration, including removable dentures. Previous studies have reported on the location, materials and usage of these prostheses, along with effects on oral-health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). However, less is known about experiences with removable dentures from a patient-centred perspective.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A scoping review of the qualitative literature was undertaken using the framework of Arksey and O'Malley, updated by Levac et al. Literature searches were carried out using Medline and Web of Science. Papers were screened by title and abstract using inclusion and exclusion criteria. Remaining papers were read in full and excluded if they did not meet the required criteria. Nine papers were included in the final review.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Key themes from these papers were: impact of tooth loss and living without teeth, and its impacts in relation to social position, appearance, confidence and function (chewing and speaking); social norms and tooth loss, including attitudes to tooth retention and treatment costs, and changes in intergenerational norms towards dentures; expectations of treatment, including patients being more involved in decision making, viewing the denture as a “gift” and dentures helping to achieve “an ideal”; living with a removable denture (complete or partial), including patient preparedness for a denture, adaptation and impacts on activities and participation; and the dentist-patient relationship, including issues with information and communication, and differing priorities between patients and dentists.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Little qualitative research exists on experiences of living with a removable denture. Existing literature demonstrates the importance of dispersed activities in differing social, spatial and temporal contexts when wearing removable dentures. Focusing on processes of positive adaptation to dentures and OHRQoL, rather than deficits, is also required to fully understand patients' experiences. Additionally, more complex technological advances may not always be in the best interest of every patient.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12583,"journal":{"name":"Gerodontology","volume":"41 3","pages":"314-327"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ger.12735","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring experiences of living with removable dentures—A scoping review of qualitative literature\",\"authors\":\"T Broomhead,&nbsp;SR Baker,&nbsp;N Martin,&nbsp;G McKenna,&nbsp;B El-Dhuwaib,&nbsp;A Alavi,&nbsp;B Gibson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ger.12735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Examine the literature on the experiences of living with removable dentures (complete or partial) to identify any gaps and provide a map for future research.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Increasing proportions of society are living partially dentate with some form of restoration, including removable dentures. Previous studies have reported on the location, materials and usage of these prostheses, along with effects on oral-health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). However, less is known about experiences with removable dentures from a patient-centred perspective.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A scoping review of the qualitative literature was undertaken using the framework of Arksey and O'Malley, updated by Levac et al. Literature searches were carried out using Medline and Web of Science. Papers were screened by title and abstract using inclusion and exclusion criteria. Remaining papers were read in full and excluded if they did not meet the required criteria. Nine papers were included in the final review.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Key themes from these papers were: impact of tooth loss and living without teeth, and its impacts in relation to social position, appearance, confidence and function (chewing and speaking); social norms and tooth loss, including attitudes to tooth retention and treatment costs, and changes in intergenerational norms towards dentures; expectations of treatment, including patients being more involved in decision making, viewing the denture as a “gift” and dentures helping to achieve “an ideal”; living with a removable denture (complete or partial), including patient preparedness for a denture, adaptation and impacts on activities and participation; and the dentist-patient relationship, including issues with information and communication, and differing priorities between patients and dentists.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Little qualitative research exists on experiences of living with a removable denture. Existing literature demonstrates the importance of dispersed activities in differing social, spatial and temporal contexts when wearing removable dentures. Focusing on processes of positive adaptation to dentures and OHRQoL, rather than deficits, is also required to fully understand patients' experiences. Additionally, more complex technological advances may not always be in the best interest of every patient.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gerodontology\",\"volume\":\"41 3\",\"pages\":\"314-327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ger.12735\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gerodontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ger.12735\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ger.12735","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:研究有关带活动假牙(全口义齿或部分义齿)生活经历的文献,找出其中的不足之处,为今后的研究提供参考:背景:社会上越来越多的人在生活中使用某种形式的修复体(包括活动假牙)来修复部分牙齿。以前的研究已经报道了这些修复体的位置、材料和使用情况,以及对口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)的影响。然而,从以患者为中心的角度来看,人们对活动义齿的使用体验却知之甚少:采用 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的框架,并经 Levac 等人更新后,对定性文献进行了范围审查。采用纳入和排除标准对论文的标题和摘要进行筛选。对其余论文进行全文阅读,如果不符合要求,则将其排除。九篇论文被纳入最终审查:这些论文的关键主题是缺牙和无牙生活的影响,及其对社会地位、外貌、自信和功能(咀嚼和说话)的影响;社会规范和缺牙,包括对保留牙齿和治疗费用的态度,以及对假牙的代际规范的变化;对治疗的期望,包括患者更多地参与决策,将假牙视为 "礼物",以及假牙有助于实现 "理想";带着活动义齿(全口义齿或部分义齿)生活,包括患者对义齿的准备情况、适应情况以及对活动和参与的影响;以及牙医与患者的关系,包括信息和沟通问题,以及患者和牙医之间不同的优先事项。结论有关带活动义齿生活经历的定性研究很少。现有文献表明,佩戴活动义齿时,在不同的社会、空间和时间背景下分散活动非常重要。要充分了解患者的经历,还需要关注患者对义齿和 OHRQoL 的积极适应过程,而不是缺陷。此外,更复杂的技术进步并不总是符合每位患者的最佳利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring experiences of living with removable dentures—A scoping review of qualitative literature

Objective

Examine the literature on the experiences of living with removable dentures (complete or partial) to identify any gaps and provide a map for future research.

Background

Increasing proportions of society are living partially dentate with some form of restoration, including removable dentures. Previous studies have reported on the location, materials and usage of these prostheses, along with effects on oral-health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). However, less is known about experiences with removable dentures from a patient-centred perspective.

Methods

A scoping review of the qualitative literature was undertaken using the framework of Arksey and O'Malley, updated by Levac et al. Literature searches were carried out using Medline and Web of Science. Papers were screened by title and abstract using inclusion and exclusion criteria. Remaining papers were read in full and excluded if they did not meet the required criteria. Nine papers were included in the final review.

Findings

Key themes from these papers were: impact of tooth loss and living without teeth, and its impacts in relation to social position, appearance, confidence and function (chewing and speaking); social norms and tooth loss, including attitudes to tooth retention and treatment costs, and changes in intergenerational norms towards dentures; expectations of treatment, including patients being more involved in decision making, viewing the denture as a “gift” and dentures helping to achieve “an ideal”; living with a removable denture (complete or partial), including patient preparedness for a denture, adaptation and impacts on activities and participation; and the dentist-patient relationship, including issues with information and communication, and differing priorities between patients and dentists.

Conclusion

Little qualitative research exists on experiences of living with a removable denture. Existing literature demonstrates the importance of dispersed activities in differing social, spatial and temporal contexts when wearing removable dentures. Focusing on processes of positive adaptation to dentures and OHRQoL, rather than deficits, is also required to fully understand patients' experiences. Additionally, more complex technological advances may not always be in the best interest of every patient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gerodontology
Gerodontology 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Gerodontology is to improve the quality of life and oral health of older people. The boundaries of most conventional dental specialties must be repeatedly crossed to provide optimal dental care for older people. In addition, management of other health problems impacts on dental care and clinicians need knowledge in these numerous overlapping areas. Bringing together these diverse topics within one journal serves clinicians who are seeking to read and to publish papers across a broad spectrum of specialties. This journal provides the juxtaposition of papers from traditional specialties but which share this patient-centred interest, providing a synergy that serves progress in the subject of gerodontology.
期刊最新文献
Natural products for denture base disinfection: A scoping review. Validity of the Oral Hygiene Ability Instrument (OHAI). Dentists' perceptions of providing care to community-dwelling older people. Distribution of Australian dental practices in relation to residential aged care facilities: A geographic analysis. Mandibular third molar coronectomy in older adults and its effects on oral health-related quality of life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1