白内障患者眼部光谱域眼底相干断层扫描生物测量仪与扫视源眼底相干断层扫描生物测量仪和光学低相干反射生物测量仪之间的一致性。

IF 1.2 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Current Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2023-12-21 eCollection Date: 2023-04-01 DOI:10.4103/joco.joco_30_23
Siamak Zarei-Ghanavati, Majid Nikpayam, Maral Namdari, Elham Bakhtiari, Samira Hassanzadeh, Mohammed Ziaei
{"title":"白内障患者眼部光谱域眼底相干断层扫描生物测量仪与扫视源眼底相干断层扫描生物测量仪和光学低相干反射生物测量仪之间的一致性。","authors":"Siamak Zarei-Ghanavati, Majid Nikpayam, Maral Namdari, Elham Bakhtiari, Samira Hassanzadeh, Mohammed Ziaei","doi":"10.4103/joco.joco_30_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the agreement between biometric parameters measured by a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography optical biometer device (Optopol Revo NX) with a validated swept-source biometer (IOLMaster 700) and a validated optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer (Lenstar LS 900), in cataract surgery candidates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective comparative study, 100 patients (100 eyes) who were eligible for cataract surgery were involved. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess agreement between devices for biometric parameters including axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and central corneal thickness (CCT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AL measurements were successful in 82 eyes (82.0%) with Revo NX, in 91 eyes (91.0%) with Lenstar LS 900, and in 97 eyes (97.0%) with IOLMaster 700. When Revo NX was compared to IOL Master 700 and Lenstar LS 900, the mean differences were as follows: -0.02 ± 0.02 mm and -0.02 ± 0.03 mm (P = 0.313, P = 0.525) for AL, 0.01 ± 0.03 mm and 0.10 ± 0.03 mm (P = 0.691, P = 0.002) for ACD, -0.15 ± 0.03 mm and 0.001 ± 0.04 mm (P < 0.001, P = 0.95) for LT, and -2.29 ± 0.92 μm, and 0.73 ± 1.43 μm (P = 0.015, P = 0.612) for CCT. Three devices were highly correlated for AL, ACD, LT, and CCT (interclass correlation coefficient > 0.75). Bland-Altman plots showed a narrower 95% limit of agreement (-0.35 to 0.31) between Revo NX and IOLMaster 700 in measuring AL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the higher measurement failure rate in eyes with cataract, the Revo NX showed very good agreement with the IOLMaster 700 and Lenstar LS 900 optical biometers in measuring AL, ACD, LT, and CCT. However, ACD and LT measurements cannot be considered interchangeable between these devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":15423,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10795816/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agreement between a Spectral-Domain Ocular Coherence Tomography Biometer with a Swept-Source Ocular Coherence Tomography Biometer and an Optical Low-Coherence Reflectometry Biometer in Eyes with Cataract.\",\"authors\":\"Siamak Zarei-Ghanavati, Majid Nikpayam, Maral Namdari, Elham Bakhtiari, Samira Hassanzadeh, Mohammed Ziaei\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/joco.joco_30_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the agreement between biometric parameters measured by a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography optical biometer device (Optopol Revo NX) with a validated swept-source biometer (IOLMaster 700) and a validated optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer (Lenstar LS 900), in cataract surgery candidates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective comparative study, 100 patients (100 eyes) who were eligible for cataract surgery were involved. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess agreement between devices for biometric parameters including axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and central corneal thickness (CCT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AL measurements were successful in 82 eyes (82.0%) with Revo NX, in 91 eyes (91.0%) with Lenstar LS 900, and in 97 eyes (97.0%) with IOLMaster 700. When Revo NX was compared to IOL Master 700 and Lenstar LS 900, the mean differences were as follows: -0.02 ± 0.02 mm and -0.02 ± 0.03 mm (P = 0.313, P = 0.525) for AL, 0.01 ± 0.03 mm and 0.10 ± 0.03 mm (P = 0.691, P = 0.002) for ACD, -0.15 ± 0.03 mm and 0.001 ± 0.04 mm (P < 0.001, P = 0.95) for LT, and -2.29 ± 0.92 μm, and 0.73 ± 1.43 μm (P = 0.015, P = 0.612) for CCT. Three devices were highly correlated for AL, ACD, LT, and CCT (interclass correlation coefficient > 0.75). Bland-Altman plots showed a narrower 95% limit of agreement (-0.35 to 0.31) between Revo NX and IOLMaster 700 in measuring AL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the higher measurement failure rate in eyes with cataract, the Revo NX showed very good agreement with the IOLMaster 700 and Lenstar LS 900 optical biometers in measuring AL, ACD, LT, and CCT. However, ACD and LT measurements cannot be considered interchangeable between these devices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Current Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10795816/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Current Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/joco.joco_30_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joco.joco_30_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估光谱域光学相干断层扫描光学生物测量仪(Optopol Revo NX)与经过验证的扫源生物测量仪(IOLMaster 700)和经过验证的光学低相干反射生物测量仪(Lenstar LS 900)在白内障手术候选者中测量的生物测量参数之间的一致性:在这项前瞻性比较研究中,共有 100 名符合白内障手术条件的患者(100 只眼)参与。使用Bland-Altman图来评估不同设备之间在轴长(AL)、前房深度(ACD)、晶状体厚度(LT)和中央角膜厚度(CCT)等生物测量参数上的一致性:使用 Revo NX 的 82 只眼睛(82.0%)、Lenstar LS 900 的 91 只眼睛(91.0%)和 IOLMaster 700 的 97 只眼睛(97.0%)都成功测量了 AL。Revo NX 与 IOL Master 700 和 Lenstar LS 900 的平均差异如下:AL为-0.02 ± 0.02 mm和-0.02 ± 0.03 mm (P = 0.313, P = 0.525),ACD为0.01 ± 0.03 mm和0.10 ± 0.03 mm (P = 0.691, P = 0.002),-0.15 ± 0.03 mm 和 0.001 ± 0.04 mm(P < 0.001,P = 0.95),CCT 为 -2.29 ± 0.92 μm 和 0.73 ± 1.43 μm(P = 0.015,P = 0.612)。三种设备在 AL、ACD、LT 和 CCT 方面高度相关(类间相关系数大于 0.75)。Bland-Altman 图显示,Revo NX 和 IOLMaster 700 在测量 AL 方面的 95% 一致性范围较窄(-0.35 至 0.31):尽管白内障患者的测量失败率较高,但 Revo NX 与 IOLMaster 700 和 Lenstar LS 900 光学生物测量仪在测量 AL、ACD、LT 和 CCT 方面的一致性非常好。但是,ACD 和 LT 的测量结果不能在这些设备之间互换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Agreement between a Spectral-Domain Ocular Coherence Tomography Biometer with a Swept-Source Ocular Coherence Tomography Biometer and an Optical Low-Coherence Reflectometry Biometer in Eyes with Cataract.

Purpose: To assess the agreement between biometric parameters measured by a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography optical biometer device (Optopol Revo NX) with a validated swept-source biometer (IOLMaster 700) and a validated optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer (Lenstar LS 900), in cataract surgery candidates.

Methods: In this prospective comparative study, 100 patients (100 eyes) who were eligible for cataract surgery were involved. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess agreement between devices for biometric parameters including axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and central corneal thickness (CCT).

Results: AL measurements were successful in 82 eyes (82.0%) with Revo NX, in 91 eyes (91.0%) with Lenstar LS 900, and in 97 eyes (97.0%) with IOLMaster 700. When Revo NX was compared to IOL Master 700 and Lenstar LS 900, the mean differences were as follows: -0.02 ± 0.02 mm and -0.02 ± 0.03 mm (P = 0.313, P = 0.525) for AL, 0.01 ± 0.03 mm and 0.10 ± 0.03 mm (P = 0.691, P = 0.002) for ACD, -0.15 ± 0.03 mm and 0.001 ± 0.04 mm (P < 0.001, P = 0.95) for LT, and -2.29 ± 0.92 μm, and 0.73 ± 1.43 μm (P = 0.015, P = 0.612) for CCT. Three devices were highly correlated for AL, ACD, LT, and CCT (interclass correlation coefficient > 0.75). Bland-Altman plots showed a narrower 95% limit of agreement (-0.35 to 0.31) between Revo NX and IOLMaster 700 in measuring AL.

Conclusions: Despite the higher measurement failure rate in eyes with cataract, the Revo NX showed very good agreement with the IOLMaster 700 and Lenstar LS 900 optical biometers in measuring AL, ACD, LT, and CCT. However, ACD and LT measurements cannot be considered interchangeable between these devices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
45
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Peer Review under the responsibility of Iranian Society of Ophthalmology Journal of Current Ophthalmology, the official publication of the Iranian Society of Ophthalmology, is a peer-reviewed, open-access, scientific journal that welcomes high quality original articles related to vision science and all fields of ophthalmology. Journal of Current Ophthalmology is the continuum of Iranian Journal of Ophthalmology published since 1969.
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Intracameral Injection of Methotrexate for Treatment of Epithelial Ingrowth. Hereditary Multiple Exostoses with Rare Ocular Finding: A Case Report. Iris-Claw Anterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lens Explantation: A Case Series. Long-Term Surgical Outcomes of Bilateral Symmetrical Superior Oblique Nasal Tenotomy in Patients of Large A-Pattern Exotropia. Low Ocular Perfusion Pressure Values at Rest and during Resistance Exercise in Offspring of Glaucoma Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1