对远程自我管理帕金森病护理路径的可行性、可接受性和安全性进行真实世界评估:医疗保健改进计划。

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Parkinson's disease Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3233/JPD-230205
Angie A Kehagia, Sarah Chowienczyk, Michelle Helena van Velthoven, Emma King, Tracie North, Deb Shenton, Jane Abraham, Joseph Langley, Rebecca Partridge, Ursula Ankeny, Terry Gorst, Emma Edwards, Sue Whipps, Martha Batup, Jane Rideout, Mat Swabey, Jemma Inches, Sue Bentley, Georgina Gilbert, Camille Carroll
{"title":"对远程自我管理帕金森病护理路径的可行性、可接受性和安全性进行真实世界评估:医疗保健改进计划。","authors":"Angie A Kehagia, Sarah Chowienczyk, Michelle Helena van Velthoven, Emma King, Tracie North, Deb Shenton, Jane Abraham, Joseph Langley, Rebecca Partridge, Ursula Ankeny, Terry Gorst, Emma Edwards, Sue Whipps, Martha Batup, Jane Rideout, Mat Swabey, Jemma Inches, Sue Bentley, Georgina Gilbert, Camille Carroll","doi":"10.3233/JPD-230205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is significant unmet need for effective and efficiently delivered care for people with Parkinson's disease (PwP). We undertook a service improvement initiative to co-develop and implement a new care pathway, Home Based Care (HBC), based on supported self-management, remote monitoring and the ability to trigger a healthcare contact when needed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate feasibility, acceptability and safety of Home Based Care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated data from the first 100 patients on HBC for 6 months. Patient monitoring, performed at baseline and 6-monthly, comprised motor (MDS-UPDRS II and accelerometer), non-motor (NMSQ, PDSS-2, HADS) and quality of life (PDQ) measures. Care quality was audited against Parkinson's UK national audit standards. Process measures captured feasibility. Acceptability was assessed using a mixed-methods approach comprising questionnaires and semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between October 2019 and January 2021, 108 PwP were enrolled onto HBC, with data from 100 being available at 6 months. Over 90% of all questionnaires were returned, 97% were complete or had < 3 missing items. Reporting and communications occurred within agreed timeframes. Compared with baseline, after 6m on HBC, PD symptoms were stable; more PwP felt listened to (90% vs. 79%) and able to seek help (79% vs. 68%). HBC met 93% of national audit criteria. Key themes from the interviews included autonomy and empowerment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have demonstrated acceptability, feasibility and safety of our novel remotely delivered Parkinson's care pathway. Ensuring scalability will widen its reach and realize its benefits for underserved communities, enabling formal comparisons with standard care and cost-effectiveness evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Parkinson's disease","volume":" ","pages":"197-208"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10836560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-World Evaluation of the Feasibility, Acceptability and Safety of a Remote, Self-Management Parkinson's Disease Care Pathway: A Healthcare Improvement Initiative.\",\"authors\":\"Angie A Kehagia, Sarah Chowienczyk, Michelle Helena van Velthoven, Emma King, Tracie North, Deb Shenton, Jane Abraham, Joseph Langley, Rebecca Partridge, Ursula Ankeny, Terry Gorst, Emma Edwards, Sue Whipps, Martha Batup, Jane Rideout, Mat Swabey, Jemma Inches, Sue Bentley, Georgina Gilbert, Camille Carroll\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/JPD-230205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is significant unmet need for effective and efficiently delivered care for people with Parkinson's disease (PwP). We undertook a service improvement initiative to co-develop and implement a new care pathway, Home Based Care (HBC), based on supported self-management, remote monitoring and the ability to trigger a healthcare contact when needed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate feasibility, acceptability and safety of Home Based Care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated data from the first 100 patients on HBC for 6 months. Patient monitoring, performed at baseline and 6-monthly, comprised motor (MDS-UPDRS II and accelerometer), non-motor (NMSQ, PDSS-2, HADS) and quality of life (PDQ) measures. Care quality was audited against Parkinson's UK national audit standards. Process measures captured feasibility. Acceptability was assessed using a mixed-methods approach comprising questionnaires and semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between October 2019 and January 2021, 108 PwP were enrolled onto HBC, with data from 100 being available at 6 months. Over 90% of all questionnaires were returned, 97% were complete or had < 3 missing items. Reporting and communications occurred within agreed timeframes. Compared with baseline, after 6m on HBC, PD symptoms were stable; more PwP felt listened to (90% vs. 79%) and able to seek help (79% vs. 68%). HBC met 93% of national audit criteria. Key themes from the interviews included autonomy and empowerment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have demonstrated acceptability, feasibility and safety of our novel remotely delivered Parkinson's care pathway. Ensuring scalability will widen its reach and realize its benefits for underserved communities, enabling formal comparisons with standard care and cost-effectiveness evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Parkinson's disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"197-208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10836560/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Parkinson's disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/JPD-230205\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Parkinson's disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/JPD-230205","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:帕金森病(PwP)患者对有效和高效护理的需求尚未得到满足。我们采取了一项服务改进措施,共同开发并实施了一种新的护理路径--居家护理(HBC),该护理路径基于支持性自我管理、远程监控以及在需要时触发医疗保健联系的能力:评估居家护理的可行性、可接受性和安全性:我们评估了首批 100 名接受居家护理的患者 6 个月的数据。患者监测在基线和 6 个月时进行,包括运动(MDS-UPDRS II 和加速度计)、非运动(NMSQ、PDSS-2、HADS)和生活质量(PDQ)测量。护理质量根据英国帕金森病国家审核标准进行审核。过程测量反映了可行性。采用问卷调查和半结构化访谈等混合方法评估可接受性:在 2019 年 10 月至 2021 年 1 月期间,108 名患者加入了 HBC,其中 100 名患者在 6 个月后获得了数据。所有调查问卷的回收率超过 90%,97% 的问卷内容完整或缺失项目小于 3 个。报告和沟通都在约定的时间内完成。与基线相比,在接受 HBC 治疗 6 个月后,帕金森病症状趋于稳定;更多的患者感到自己的意见被倾听(90% 对 79%),并且能够寻求帮助(79% 对 68%)。HBC 符合 93% 的国家审核标准。访谈的关键主题包括自主和赋权:我们已经证明了新型远程帕金森病护理路径的可接受性、可行性和安全性。确保可扩展性将扩大其覆盖范围,并为服务不足的社区带来益处,从而能够与标准护理和成本效益评估进行正式比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Real-World Evaluation of the Feasibility, Acceptability and Safety of a Remote, Self-Management Parkinson's Disease Care Pathway: A Healthcare Improvement Initiative.

Background: There is significant unmet need for effective and efficiently delivered care for people with Parkinson's disease (PwP). We undertook a service improvement initiative to co-develop and implement a new care pathway, Home Based Care (HBC), based on supported self-management, remote monitoring and the ability to trigger a healthcare contact when needed.

Objective: To evaluate feasibility, acceptability and safety of Home Based Care.

Methods: We evaluated data from the first 100 patients on HBC for 6 months. Patient monitoring, performed at baseline and 6-monthly, comprised motor (MDS-UPDRS II and accelerometer), non-motor (NMSQ, PDSS-2, HADS) and quality of life (PDQ) measures. Care quality was audited against Parkinson's UK national audit standards. Process measures captured feasibility. Acceptability was assessed using a mixed-methods approach comprising questionnaires and semi-structured interviews.

Results: Between October 2019 and January 2021, 108 PwP were enrolled onto HBC, with data from 100 being available at 6 months. Over 90% of all questionnaires were returned, 97% were complete or had < 3 missing items. Reporting and communications occurred within agreed timeframes. Compared with baseline, after 6m on HBC, PD symptoms were stable; more PwP felt listened to (90% vs. 79%) and able to seek help (79% vs. 68%). HBC met 93% of national audit criteria. Key themes from the interviews included autonomy and empowerment.

Conclusions: We have demonstrated acceptability, feasibility and safety of our novel remotely delivered Parkinson's care pathway. Ensuring scalability will widen its reach and realize its benefits for underserved communities, enabling formal comparisons with standard care and cost-effectiveness evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
5.80%
发文量
338
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Parkinson''s Disease (JPD) publishes original research in basic science, translational research and clinical medicine in Parkinson’s disease in cooperation with the Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease. It features a first class Editorial Board and provides rigorous peer review and rapid online publication.
期刊最新文献
Prospective Study of Lung Function with Prodromal, Clinical Parkinson's Disease, and Mortality. Winding Back the Clock on Advanced Therapies: It's Time to Get Smart. Non-Pharmacological Interventions for People with Parkinson's Disease: Are We Entering a New Era? Prospective Role of PAK6 and 14-3-3γ as Biomarkers for Parkinson’s Disease U.S. Tax Credits to Promote Practical Proactive Preventative Care for Parkinson’s Disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1