在门诊环境中实施电子病历的益处、促进因素和障碍:范围综述。

Q3 Medicine Healthcare Management Forum Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-20 DOI:10.1177/08404704231224070
Hamidreza Kavandi, Zeina Al Awar, Mirou Jaana
{"title":"在门诊环境中实施电子病历的益处、促进因素和障碍:范围综述。","authors":"Hamidreza Kavandi, Zeina Al Awar, Mirou Jaana","doi":"10.1177/08404704231224070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This scoping review examined the breadth and depth of evidence on Electronic Medical Record (EMR) implementation benefits in outpatient settings. Following PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews, five databases were searched, and 24 studies were retained and reviewed. Benefits, facilitators, and barriers to EMR implementation were extracted. Direct benefits included improved communication/reporting, work efficiency, care process, healthcare outcomes, safety, and patient-centredness of care. Indirect benefits were improved financial performance and increased data accessibility, staff satisfaction, and decision-support usage. Barriers included time and financial constraints; design/technical issues; limited information technology resources, skills, and infrastructure capacity; increased workload and reduced efficiency during implementation; incompatibility of existing systems and local regulations; and resistance from healthcare professionals. Facilitators included training, change management, user-friendliness and alignment with workflow, user experience with EMRs, top management support, and sufficient resources. More rigorous, systematic research is needed, using relevant frameworks to inform healthcare policies and guide EMR projects in outpatient areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":39854,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Management Forum","volume":" ","pages":"215-225"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11264554/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benefits, facilitators, and barriers of electronic medical records implementation in outpatient settings: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Hamidreza Kavandi, Zeina Al Awar, Mirou Jaana\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08404704231224070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This scoping review examined the breadth and depth of evidence on Electronic Medical Record (EMR) implementation benefits in outpatient settings. Following PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews, five databases were searched, and 24 studies were retained and reviewed. Benefits, facilitators, and barriers to EMR implementation were extracted. Direct benefits included improved communication/reporting, work efficiency, care process, healthcare outcomes, safety, and patient-centredness of care. Indirect benefits were improved financial performance and increased data accessibility, staff satisfaction, and decision-support usage. Barriers included time and financial constraints; design/technical issues; limited information technology resources, skills, and infrastructure capacity; increased workload and reduced efficiency during implementation; incompatibility of existing systems and local regulations; and resistance from healthcare professionals. Facilitators included training, change management, user-friendliness and alignment with workflow, user experience with EMRs, top management support, and sufficient resources. More rigorous, systematic research is needed, using relevant frameworks to inform healthcare policies and guide EMR projects in outpatient areas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare Management Forum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"215-225\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11264554/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare Management Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704231224070\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Management Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704231224070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本范围界定综述研究了门诊环境中电子病历(EMR)实施效益的证据广度和深度。按照范围界定审查的 PRISMA 指南,对五个数据库进行了检索,保留并审查了 24 项研究。提取了实施 EMR 的益处、促进因素和障碍。直接效益包括改善沟通/报告、工作效率、护理流程、医疗成果、安全性和以患者为中心的护理。间接效益包括财务业绩的改善、数据可获取性的提高、员工满意度的提高以及决策支持的使用。障碍包括时间和资金限制;设计/技术问题;信息技术资源、技能和基础设施能力有限;实施过程中工作量增加、效率降低;现有系统与当地法规不兼容;以及医疗保健专业人员的抵制。促进因素包括培训、变革管理、用户友好性和与工作流程的一致性、用户使用电子病历的经验、高层管理人员的支持以及充足的资源。需要进行更严格、更系统的研究,利用相关框架为医疗保健政策提供信息,并指导门诊区域的电子病历项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Benefits, facilitators, and barriers of electronic medical records implementation in outpatient settings: A scoping review.

This scoping review examined the breadth and depth of evidence on Electronic Medical Record (EMR) implementation benefits in outpatient settings. Following PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews, five databases were searched, and 24 studies were retained and reviewed. Benefits, facilitators, and barriers to EMR implementation were extracted. Direct benefits included improved communication/reporting, work efficiency, care process, healthcare outcomes, safety, and patient-centredness of care. Indirect benefits were improved financial performance and increased data accessibility, staff satisfaction, and decision-support usage. Barriers included time and financial constraints; design/technical issues; limited information technology resources, skills, and infrastructure capacity; increased workload and reduced efficiency during implementation; incompatibility of existing systems and local regulations; and resistance from healthcare professionals. Facilitators included training, change management, user-friendliness and alignment with workflow, user experience with EMRs, top management support, and sufficient resources. More rigorous, systematic research is needed, using relevant frameworks to inform healthcare policies and guide EMR projects in outpatient areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare Management Forum
Healthcare Management Forum Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Healthcare Management Forum is the official journal of the Canadian College of Health Service Executives. It is the only peer-reviewed journal that covers issues related to advances in health services management, theory and practice in a Canadian context. The quality of its contributors, the rigorous review process and the leading-edge topics make it truly unique!
期刊最新文献
An ecological approach to humanizing healthcare organizations for patients, healthcare providers, and communities. Integrating informal and formal care: An innovative, scalable program blueprint. From perpetual pilots to sustainable transformation: Scaling up geriatric care. Preventing health care worker burnout in primary care settings through the trauma-informed CARES leadership competency model. Considerations for emergency department virtual triage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1