评估非吸烟者和传统可燃烟草制品及非可燃替代品使用者口腔黏膜细胞的细胞毒性和基因毒性效应。

IF 6.8 Q1 TOXICOLOGY Journal of Xenobiotics Pub Date : 2024-01-12 DOI:10.3390/jox14010009
Antonija Tadin, Vinka Stazic, Nada Galic, Davor Zeljezic
{"title":"评估非吸烟者和传统可燃烟草制品及非可燃替代品使用者口腔黏膜细胞的细胞毒性和基因毒性效应。","authors":"Antonija Tadin, Vinka Stazic, Nada Galic, Davor Zeljezic","doi":"10.3390/jox14010009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims/objectives: </strong>The aim of this cross-sectional observational study was to investigate cytogenetic damage to the buccal mucosa in non-smokers and consumers of traditional combustible tobacco products and non-combustible alternatives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 160 participants were divided into four groups according to the type of product used, including non-smokers, users of conventional combustible tobacco (cigarettes), heated tobacco, and electronic, tobacco-free vapor products (e-cigarettes). Buccal mucosa samples were analyzed using the micronucleus cytome assay to assess cytotoxic and genotoxic damage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>E-cigarette users showed significantly higher values for all tested parameters in the micronucleus test compared to non-smokers (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Similarly, users of tobacco heating products showed an increase in all parameters (<i>p</i> < 0.05), with the exception of the number of cells with micronuclei. Conventional cigarette smokers showed a notable increase in the number of binucleated cells and cells with karyorrhexis and karyolysis (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05). When assessing the differences between users of traditional combustible tobacco products and non-combustible alternatives, these did not appear to be significant, except for e-cigarette users, who had significantly more cells with condensed chromatin (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.001), while users of tobacco heating products had more pyknotic cells (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study underscore the heightened occurrence of cytotoxic and genotoxic damage in users of both conventional combustible tobacco products and non-combustible alternatives compared to non-smokers, emphasizing the detrimental impact of these products on the oral mucosa.</p>","PeriodicalId":42356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Xenobiotics","volume":"14 1","pages":"154-165"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10801550/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Cytotoxic and Genotoxic Effects in Buccal Mucosal Cells in Non-Smokers and Users of Traditional Combustible Tobacco Products and Non-Combustible Alternatives.\",\"authors\":\"Antonija Tadin, Vinka Stazic, Nada Galic, Davor Zeljezic\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jox14010009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims/objectives: </strong>The aim of this cross-sectional observational study was to investigate cytogenetic damage to the buccal mucosa in non-smokers and consumers of traditional combustible tobacco products and non-combustible alternatives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 160 participants were divided into four groups according to the type of product used, including non-smokers, users of conventional combustible tobacco (cigarettes), heated tobacco, and electronic, tobacco-free vapor products (e-cigarettes). Buccal mucosa samples were analyzed using the micronucleus cytome assay to assess cytotoxic and genotoxic damage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>E-cigarette users showed significantly higher values for all tested parameters in the micronucleus test compared to non-smokers (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Similarly, users of tobacco heating products showed an increase in all parameters (<i>p</i> < 0.05), with the exception of the number of cells with micronuclei. Conventional cigarette smokers showed a notable increase in the number of binucleated cells and cells with karyorrhexis and karyolysis (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05). When assessing the differences between users of traditional combustible tobacco products and non-combustible alternatives, these did not appear to be significant, except for e-cigarette users, who had significantly more cells with condensed chromatin (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.001), while users of tobacco heating products had more pyknotic cells (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study underscore the heightened occurrence of cytotoxic and genotoxic damage in users of both conventional combustible tobacco products and non-combustible alternatives compared to non-smokers, emphasizing the detrimental impact of these products on the oral mucosa.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Xenobiotics\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"154-165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10801550/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Xenobiotics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jox14010009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Xenobiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jox14010009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的/目标:这项横断面观察性研究旨在调查非吸烟者、传统可燃烟草制品和非可燃烟草制品消费者口腔黏膜的细胞遗传学损伤:根据使用的烟草产品类型将160名参与者分为四组,包括非吸烟者、传统可燃烟草(香烟)使用者、加热烟草使用者和电子无烟蒸汽产品(电子烟)使用者。使用微核细胞组测定法对颊粘膜样本进行分析,以评估细胞毒性和基因毒性损伤:结果:在微核测试中,电子烟使用者的所有测试参数值都明显高于非吸烟者(p < 0.05)。同样,烟草加热产品使用者的所有参数都有所增加(p < 0.05),但微核细胞数量除外。传统香烟吸食者的双核细胞以及核分裂和核溶解细胞数量明显增加(p ≤ 0.05)。在评估传统可燃烟草制品和非可燃烟草制品使用者之间的差异时,这些差异似乎并不显著,但电子烟使用者除外,他们的染色质凝结细胞明显增多(p ≤ 0.001),而烟草加热制品使用者的细胞凋亡增多(p ≤ 0.001):本研究结果表明,与不吸烟者相比,使用传统可燃烟草制品和非可燃烟草制品的人发生细胞毒性和基因毒性损伤的几率更高,强调了这些产品对口腔黏膜的有害影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Cytotoxic and Genotoxic Effects in Buccal Mucosal Cells in Non-Smokers and Users of Traditional Combustible Tobacco Products and Non-Combustible Alternatives.

Aims/objectives: The aim of this cross-sectional observational study was to investigate cytogenetic damage to the buccal mucosa in non-smokers and consumers of traditional combustible tobacco products and non-combustible alternatives.

Methods: A total of 160 participants were divided into four groups according to the type of product used, including non-smokers, users of conventional combustible tobacco (cigarettes), heated tobacco, and electronic, tobacco-free vapor products (e-cigarettes). Buccal mucosa samples were analyzed using the micronucleus cytome assay to assess cytotoxic and genotoxic damage.

Results: E-cigarette users showed significantly higher values for all tested parameters in the micronucleus test compared to non-smokers (p < 0.05). Similarly, users of tobacco heating products showed an increase in all parameters (p < 0.05), with the exception of the number of cells with micronuclei. Conventional cigarette smokers showed a notable increase in the number of binucleated cells and cells with karyorrhexis and karyolysis (p ≤ 0.05). When assessing the differences between users of traditional combustible tobacco products and non-combustible alternatives, these did not appear to be significant, except for e-cigarette users, who had significantly more cells with condensed chromatin (p ≤ 0.001), while users of tobacco heating products had more pyknotic cells (p ≤ 0.001).

Conclusion: The results of this study underscore the heightened occurrence of cytotoxic and genotoxic damage in users of both conventional combustible tobacco products and non-combustible alternatives compared to non-smokers, emphasizing the detrimental impact of these products on the oral mucosa.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
1.70%
发文量
21
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Xenobiotics publishes original studies concerning the beneficial (pharmacology) and detrimental effects (toxicology) of xenobiotics in all organisms. A xenobiotic (“stranger to life”) is defined as a chemical that is not usually found at significant concentrations or expected to reside for long periods in organisms. In addition to man-made chemicals, natural products could also be of interest if they have potent biological properties, special medicinal properties or that a given organism is at risk of exposure in the environment. Topics dealing with abiotic- and biotic-based transformations in various media (xenobiochemistry) and environmental toxicology are also of interest. Areas of interests include the identification of key physical and chemical properties of molecules that predict biological effects and persistence in the environment; the molecular mode of action of xenobiotics; biochemical and physiological interactions leading to change in organism health; pathophysiological interactions of natural and synthetic chemicals; development of biochemical indicators including new “-omics” approaches to identify biomarkers of exposure or effects for xenobiotics.
期刊最新文献
Air-Pollution-Mediated Microbial Dysbiosis in Health and Disease: Lung-Gut Axis and Beyond. Environmental Stress-Induced Alterations in Embryo Developmental Morphokinetics. Oxidative Processes and Xenobiotic Metabolism in Plants: Mechanisms of Defense and Potential Therapeutic Implications. Acute Quetiapine Intoxication: Relationship Between Ingested Dose, Serum Concentration and Clinical Presentation-Structured Literature Review and Analysis. Network Pharmacology Approaches Used to Identify Therapeutic Molecules for Chronic Venous Disease Based on Potential miRNA Biomarkers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1