晚期复发性癌症患者使用阿片类镇痛药治疗疼痛的心理障碍:一项多中心队列研究

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Palliative medicine reports Pub Date : 2024-01-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/pmr.2023.0068
Takehiko Tsuno, Takashi Kawaguchi, Ryota Yanaizumi, Junichi Kondo, Keiko Kojima, Takashi Igarashi, Masaki Inoue, Tomofumi Miura, Akime Miyasato, Kanako Azuma, Hiroshi Hamada, Tomoya Saeki, Hironori Mawatari, Hiroyuki Ogura, Akira Kotani, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, Hideki Hakamata
{"title":"晚期复发性癌症患者使用阿片类镇痛药治疗疼痛的心理障碍:一项多中心队列研究","authors":"Takehiko Tsuno, Takashi Kawaguchi, Ryota Yanaizumi, Junichi Kondo, Keiko Kojima, Takashi Igarashi, Masaki Inoue, Tomofumi Miura, Akime Miyasato, Kanako Azuma, Hiroshi Hamada, Tomoya Saeki, Hironori Mawatari, Hiroyuki Ogura, Akira Kotani, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, Hideki Hakamata","doi":"10.1089/pmr.2023.0068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to gain insight into psychological barriers toward initiation of strong opioid analgesic use in patients with advanced recurrent cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 46 patients who were prescribed with opioid analgesics for advanced recurrent cancer. The primary outcome was psychological barriers assessed using the Japanese version of the Barriers Questionnaire-II (JBQ-II). The secondary outcomes were psychological changes and pain relief one week after the induction of strong opioid analgesics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of participants was 63.6 years. Furthermore, 26.1% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of ≥3. The mean JBQ-II total score was 1.97 (95% confidence interval: 1.75-2.19). At the initiation of opioid therapy, there was no difference in the total scores between the baseline and one week later. Nevertheless, there was a significant difference in the subscale \"disease progression\" score (mean 2.97 vs. 2.59, difference in means 0.38, standard error 0.16, <i>p</i> = 0.026). Personalized Pain Goal (PPG) was achieved in about half of the participants, and a trend toward a higher score in the subscale \"harmful effects\" (concern about adverse events) was observed in those who did not achieve PPG.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that patients with advanced recurrent cancer have psychological barriers to opioid induction. The relationship between the presence of psychological barriers before and after induction of opioid analgesics and the speed of pain improvement was determined. The results may provide fundamental information for prospective intervention studies to develop individualized education programs for patients with psychological barriers to opioids.Clinical Trial Registration Number UMIN000042443.</p>","PeriodicalId":74394,"journal":{"name":"Palliative medicine reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10797307/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychological Barriers to the Use of Opioid Analgesics for Treating Pain in Patients With Advanced Recurrent Cancer: A Multicenter Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Takehiko Tsuno, Takashi Kawaguchi, Ryota Yanaizumi, Junichi Kondo, Keiko Kojima, Takashi Igarashi, Masaki Inoue, Tomofumi Miura, Akime Miyasato, Kanako Azuma, Hiroshi Hamada, Tomoya Saeki, Hironori Mawatari, Hiroyuki Ogura, Akira Kotani, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, Hideki Hakamata\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/pmr.2023.0068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to gain insight into psychological barriers toward initiation of strong opioid analgesic use in patients with advanced recurrent cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 46 patients who were prescribed with opioid analgesics for advanced recurrent cancer. The primary outcome was psychological barriers assessed using the Japanese version of the Barriers Questionnaire-II (JBQ-II). The secondary outcomes were psychological changes and pain relief one week after the induction of strong opioid analgesics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of participants was 63.6 years. Furthermore, 26.1% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of ≥3. The mean JBQ-II total score was 1.97 (95% confidence interval: 1.75-2.19). At the initiation of opioid therapy, there was no difference in the total scores between the baseline and one week later. Nevertheless, there was a significant difference in the subscale \\\"disease progression\\\" score (mean 2.97 vs. 2.59, difference in means 0.38, standard error 0.16, <i>p</i> = 0.026). Personalized Pain Goal (PPG) was achieved in about half of the participants, and a trend toward a higher score in the subscale \\\"harmful effects\\\" (concern about adverse events) was observed in those who did not achieve PPG.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that patients with advanced recurrent cancer have psychological barriers to opioid induction. The relationship between the presence of psychological barriers before and after induction of opioid analgesics and the speed of pain improvement was determined. The results may provide fundamental information for prospective intervention studies to develop individualized education programs for patients with psychological barriers to opioids.Clinical Trial Registration Number UMIN000042443.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative medicine reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10797307/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative medicine reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2023.0068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative medicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2023.0068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景我们旨在深入了解晚期复发性癌症患者开始使用强效阿片类镇痛药的心理障碍:本研究纳入了 46 名因晚期复发癌症而被处方阿片类镇痛药的患者。主要结果是使用日语版障碍问卷-II(JBQ-II)评估心理障碍。次要结果是使用强阿片类镇痛药一周后的心理变化和疼痛缓解情况:参与者的平均年龄为 63.6 岁。此外,26.1%的受试者的东部合作肿瘤学组(ECOG)表现状态≥3。JBQ-II 总分的平均值为 1.97(95% 置信区间:1.75-2.19)。在开始接受阿片类药物治疗时,基线总分与一周后的总分没有差异。然而,"疾病进展 "子量表得分却有显著差异(平均值 2.97 vs. 2.59,平均值差异 0.38,标准误差 0.16,P = 0.026)。约半数参与者实现了个性化疼痛目标(PPG),未实现 PPG 的参与者在 "有害影响"(对不良事件的担忧)分量表中的得分呈上升趋势:本研究表明,晚期复发性癌症患者对阿片类药物诱导存在心理障碍。研究还确定了阿片类镇痛药诱导前后心理障碍的存在与疼痛改善速度之间的关系。研究结果可为前瞻性干预研究提供基础信息,为存在阿片类药物心理障碍的患者制定个性化教育计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychological Barriers to the Use of Opioid Analgesics for Treating Pain in Patients With Advanced Recurrent Cancer: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

Background: We aimed to gain insight into psychological barriers toward initiation of strong opioid analgesic use in patients with advanced recurrent cancer.

Methods: This study included 46 patients who were prescribed with opioid analgesics for advanced recurrent cancer. The primary outcome was psychological barriers assessed using the Japanese version of the Barriers Questionnaire-II (JBQ-II). The secondary outcomes were psychological changes and pain relief one week after the induction of strong opioid analgesics.

Results: The mean age of participants was 63.6 years. Furthermore, 26.1% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of ≥3. The mean JBQ-II total score was 1.97 (95% confidence interval: 1.75-2.19). At the initiation of opioid therapy, there was no difference in the total scores between the baseline and one week later. Nevertheless, there was a significant difference in the subscale "disease progression" score (mean 2.97 vs. 2.59, difference in means 0.38, standard error 0.16, p = 0.026). Personalized Pain Goal (PPG) was achieved in about half of the participants, and a trend toward a higher score in the subscale "harmful effects" (concern about adverse events) was observed in those who did not achieve PPG.

Conclusion: This study showed that patients with advanced recurrent cancer have psychological barriers to opioid induction. The relationship between the presence of psychological barriers before and after induction of opioid analgesics and the speed of pain improvement was determined. The results may provide fundamental information for prospective intervention studies to develop individualized education programs for patients with psychological barriers to opioids.Clinical Trial Registration Number UMIN000042443.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Characteristics, Outcomes and Factors for Place of Death in Patients Admitted to Community-Based Palliative Care Services in Shanghai China: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Nursing Practices for Dyspnea Management in Patients with Cancer Based on Monthly and Weekly Prognoses: A Multi-Site Cross-Sectional Study of Palliative Care Nurses in Japan. Is a Combination of Six Clinical Tests Useful as a Measure to Predict Short-Term Prognosis in Terminal Cancer Patients? A Prospective Observational Study in a Japanese Palliative Care Unit. The Surprise Question: Not Ready for Prime Time. Use of Nursing Support Among Nurses for Caregiver Burden in Family Caregivers of Terminally Ill Patients with Cancer in Palliative Care Units in Japan: Multisite Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1