{"title":"[微血管减压术的术中监测]。","authors":"Masafumi Fukuda, Makoto Oishi, Yukihiko Fujii","doi":"10.11477/mf.1436204894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During microvascular decompression(MVD)for hemifacial spasm(HFS), trigeminal neuralgia(TN), and glossopharyngeal neuralgia(GPN), brainstem auditory-evoked potential monitoring is widely used to preserve hearing function. In MVD for HFS, abnormal muscle response monitoring is useful for identifying the offending vessels compressing the facial nerve and confirming the completion of decompression intraoperatively. The amplitude of facial motor-evoked potential by transcranial electrical stimulation in the orbicularis oculi muscle is reported to decrease after completing MVD. The Z-L response(ZLR)probably confirms the true offending vessels by stimulating the culprit vessels; then, the ZLR could disappear after decompressing the offending vessels away from the compression sites. Spontaneous electromyographic activities obtained from the mentalis muscles by injection of saline into the facial nerve reportedly decreased after MVD compared with those before MVD. In MVD for the GPN, glossopharyngeal motor-evoked potential by transcranial electrical stimulation is used to preserve swallowing function and not to assess the completion of MVD. Because MVD for both the TN and GPN can result in normalization of the hyperactivity of the sensory nerve, it may be difficult to develop any monitoring to confirm the completion of MVD during surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":35984,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Intraoperative Monitoring During Microvascular Decompression].\",\"authors\":\"Masafumi Fukuda, Makoto Oishi, Yukihiko Fujii\",\"doi\":\"10.11477/mf.1436204894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>During microvascular decompression(MVD)for hemifacial spasm(HFS), trigeminal neuralgia(TN), and glossopharyngeal neuralgia(GPN), brainstem auditory-evoked potential monitoring is widely used to preserve hearing function. In MVD for HFS, abnormal muscle response monitoring is useful for identifying the offending vessels compressing the facial nerve and confirming the completion of decompression intraoperatively. The amplitude of facial motor-evoked potential by transcranial electrical stimulation in the orbicularis oculi muscle is reported to decrease after completing MVD. The Z-L response(ZLR)probably confirms the true offending vessels by stimulating the culprit vessels; then, the ZLR could disappear after decompressing the offending vessels away from the compression sites. Spontaneous electromyographic activities obtained from the mentalis muscles by injection of saline into the facial nerve reportedly decreased after MVD compared with those before MVD. In MVD for the GPN, glossopharyngeal motor-evoked potential by transcranial electrical stimulation is used to preserve swallowing function and not to assess the completion of MVD. Because MVD for both the TN and GPN can result in normalization of the hyperactivity of the sensory nerve, it may be difficult to develop any monitoring to confirm the completion of MVD during surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurological Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurological Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11477/mf.1436204894\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11477/mf.1436204894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Intraoperative Monitoring During Microvascular Decompression].
During microvascular decompression(MVD)for hemifacial spasm(HFS), trigeminal neuralgia(TN), and glossopharyngeal neuralgia(GPN), brainstem auditory-evoked potential monitoring is widely used to preserve hearing function. In MVD for HFS, abnormal muscle response monitoring is useful for identifying the offending vessels compressing the facial nerve and confirming the completion of decompression intraoperatively. The amplitude of facial motor-evoked potential by transcranial electrical stimulation in the orbicularis oculi muscle is reported to decrease after completing MVD. The Z-L response(ZLR)probably confirms the true offending vessels by stimulating the culprit vessels; then, the ZLR could disappear after decompressing the offending vessels away from the compression sites. Spontaneous electromyographic activities obtained from the mentalis muscles by injection of saline into the facial nerve reportedly decreased after MVD compared with those before MVD. In MVD for the GPN, glossopharyngeal motor-evoked potential by transcranial electrical stimulation is used to preserve swallowing function and not to assess the completion of MVD. Because MVD for both the TN and GPN can result in normalization of the hyperactivity of the sensory nerve, it may be difficult to develop any monitoring to confirm the completion of MVD during surgery.