管理国有企业环境、社会、治理和财务可持续性之间的权衡:新兴市场的启示

IF 3.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Australian Accounting Review Pub Date : 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1111/auar.12415
Adeyemi Adebayo, Barry Ackers
{"title":"管理国有企业环境、社会、治理和财务可持续性之间的权衡:新兴市场的启示","authors":"Adeyemi Adebayo,&nbsp;Barry Ackers","doi":"10.1111/auar.12415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Concerns remain about how companies will reconcile environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues with their core mandates. This is one reason why many organisations did not initially subscribe to sustainable investing, reporting and accounting, especially where it is not mandatory, despite growing stakeholder pressure to do so. This paper examines how state-owned enterprises (SOEs) with social and commercial mandates in South Africa, where sustainability reporting is mandatory, balance ESG practices and financial sustainability to fulfil their mandates. This article proposes and evaluates propositions about SOEs adopting and reporting ESG components using a survey questionnaire and semi-structured interviews with important SOE stakeholders to show that its sustainability accounting approach benefits policy and non-policy observers. More than half of the studied SOEs have embraced and disclosed their ESG practices, yet there appears to be no systematic way in which they balance ESG practices and financial sustainability, resulting in conflict. This paper appears to be the first SOE study on this topic. In this regard, this study offers novel insights into how sustainability practices may be incorporated into the social and commercial objectives of SOEs, which in most cases are conflicting, while still allowing SOEs to be financially sustainable and depend less on state bailouts, which is often the case, especially in Africa and in countries that face a high level of corruption. Considering the characteristics and mandates of SOEs, part of being socially responsible is utilising public resources in the form of taxpayers’ money in an efficient, effective and accountable manner. The discussion in this paper indicates that paying attention to ESG issues is part of a broader accountability mechanism expected from SOEs. Also, the choice of South Africa and of SOEs in South Africa has implications for theory and practice since SOEs in South Africa have social and commercial objectives such that they are expected to be agents of social responsibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":51552,"journal":{"name":"Australian Accounting Review","volume":"34 1","pages":"55-73"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/auar.12415","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managing Trade-Offs Between Environmental, Social, Governance and Financial Sustainability in State-Owned Enterprises: Insights from an Emerging Market\",\"authors\":\"Adeyemi Adebayo,&nbsp;Barry Ackers\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/auar.12415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Concerns remain about how companies will reconcile environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues with their core mandates. This is one reason why many organisations did not initially subscribe to sustainable investing, reporting and accounting, especially where it is not mandatory, despite growing stakeholder pressure to do so. This paper examines how state-owned enterprises (SOEs) with social and commercial mandates in South Africa, where sustainability reporting is mandatory, balance ESG practices and financial sustainability to fulfil their mandates. This article proposes and evaluates propositions about SOEs adopting and reporting ESG components using a survey questionnaire and semi-structured interviews with important SOE stakeholders to show that its sustainability accounting approach benefits policy and non-policy observers. More than half of the studied SOEs have embraced and disclosed their ESG practices, yet there appears to be no systematic way in which they balance ESG practices and financial sustainability, resulting in conflict. This paper appears to be the first SOE study on this topic. In this regard, this study offers novel insights into how sustainability practices may be incorporated into the social and commercial objectives of SOEs, which in most cases are conflicting, while still allowing SOEs to be financially sustainable and depend less on state bailouts, which is often the case, especially in Africa and in countries that face a high level of corruption. Considering the characteristics and mandates of SOEs, part of being socially responsible is utilising public resources in the form of taxpayers’ money in an efficient, effective and accountable manner. The discussion in this paper indicates that paying attention to ESG issues is part of a broader accountability mechanism expected from SOEs. Also, the choice of South Africa and of SOEs in South Africa has implications for theory and practice since SOEs in South Africa have social and commercial objectives such that they are expected to be agents of social responsibility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Accounting Review\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"55-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/auar.12415\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Accounting Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/auar.12415\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/auar.12415","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

企业如何协调环境、社会和治理 (ESG) 问题与其核心任务之间的关系仍然令人担忧。这也是许多组织最初并不支持可持续投资、报告和会计的原因之一,尤其是在没有强制要求的情况下,尽管利益相关者要求这样做的压力越来越大。在南非,可持续发展报告是强制性的,本文探讨了负有社会和商业使命的国有企业如何平衡环境、社会和公司治理实践与财务可持续性,以履行其使命。本文通过对国有企业重要利益相关者进行调查问卷和半结构式访谈,提出并评估了有关国有企业采用和报告 ESG 要素的命题,以表明其可持续性会计方法有利于政策和非政策观察者。在所研究的国有企业中,半数以上接受并披露了其环境、社会和公司治理实践,但似乎没有系统的方法来平衡环境、社会和公司治理实践与财务可持续性,从而导致冲突。本文似乎是第一份关于这一主题的国有企业研究报告。在这方面,本研究就如何将可持续发展实践纳入国有企业的社会和商业目标(在大多数情况下,这两者是相互冲突的)提供了新颖的见解,同时还能使国有企业在财务上可持续发展,减少对国家救助的依赖(这种情况在非洲和腐败严重的国家尤为常见)。考虑到国有企业的特点和任务,承担社会责任的一部分就是以高效、有效和负责任的方式利用纳税人的钱这种公共资源。本文的讨论表明,对环境、社会和公司治理问题的关注是人们对国有企业期望的更广泛的问责机制的一部分。此外,选择南非和南非的国有企业对理论和实践也有影响,因为南非的国有企业具有社会和商业目标,因此它们有望成为社会责任的推动者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Managing Trade-Offs Between Environmental, Social, Governance and Financial Sustainability in State-Owned Enterprises: Insights from an Emerging Market

Concerns remain about how companies will reconcile environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues with their core mandates. This is one reason why many organisations did not initially subscribe to sustainable investing, reporting and accounting, especially where it is not mandatory, despite growing stakeholder pressure to do so. This paper examines how state-owned enterprises (SOEs) with social and commercial mandates in South Africa, where sustainability reporting is mandatory, balance ESG practices and financial sustainability to fulfil their mandates. This article proposes and evaluates propositions about SOEs adopting and reporting ESG components using a survey questionnaire and semi-structured interviews with important SOE stakeholders to show that its sustainability accounting approach benefits policy and non-policy observers. More than half of the studied SOEs have embraced and disclosed their ESG practices, yet there appears to be no systematic way in which they balance ESG practices and financial sustainability, resulting in conflict. This paper appears to be the first SOE study on this topic. In this regard, this study offers novel insights into how sustainability practices may be incorporated into the social and commercial objectives of SOEs, which in most cases are conflicting, while still allowing SOEs to be financially sustainable and depend less on state bailouts, which is often the case, especially in Africa and in countries that face a high level of corruption. Considering the characteristics and mandates of SOEs, part of being socially responsible is utilising public resources in the form of taxpayers’ money in an efficient, effective and accountable manner. The discussion in this paper indicates that paying attention to ESG issues is part of a broader accountability mechanism expected from SOEs. Also, the choice of South Africa and of SOEs in South Africa has implications for theory and practice since SOEs in South Africa have social and commercial objectives such that they are expected to be agents of social responsibility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Accounting Review
Australian Accounting Review BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
17.60%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The Boundaries of Accounting The Shifting and Permeable Boundaries of Auditing: Evidence from Early Australian Examination Papers CEO Benevolence and Corporate Social Performance Integrated Reporting Impact on Core Organisational Practices: A Practice-Based Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1