一项探索性研究,评估阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合症患者和对照组在开车时使用的应对策略。

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM ERJ Open Research Pub Date : 2024-01-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1183/23120541.00638-2023
Akshay Dwarakanath, Vinod Palissery, Dipansu Ghosh, Samantha Jamson, Mark Elliott
{"title":"一项探索性研究,评估阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合症患者和对照组在开车时使用的应对策略。","authors":"Akshay Dwarakanath, Vinod Palissery, Dipansu Ghosh, Samantha Jamson, Mark Elliott","doi":"10.1183/23120541.00638-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sleepiness while driving is potentially fatal, and it is recommended that a driver who starts to feel tired should stop and have a rest. However, some may use various countermeasures to try to stay alert. We devised a questionnaire that assessed various potential coping strategies that might be used against fatigue and compared them between obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) patients and controls and with sleepiness in general (Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)), specifically while driving (Driving Sleepiness Scale (DSS)) and driving incidents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>119 untreated OSAS patients (male 82%, body mass index (BMI) 37±8 kg·m<sup>-2</sup>, ESS 14±5, DSS 3±2, oxygen desaturation index (ODI) 39±15) and 105 controls (male 70%, BMI 28±6 kg·m<sup>-2</sup>, ESS 4±3, DSS 7±6) matched for age and driving experience were recruited. All completed a questionnaire relating to their experience over the last year, which included sleepiness in general, sleepiness specifically while driving, 10 questions about various coping strategies they might adopt in order to avoid sleepiness and their history of incidents while driving.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As compared to controls, nearly a third of OSAS patients (29.4%) used more than three coping strategies \"frequently\". OSAS patients who used more than three such strategies had worse ESS (17±4 <i>versus</i> 12±5, p<0.0001); were more likely to feel sleepy while driving (10±8 <i>versus</i> 5±7, p=0.0002) and had more reported accidents (22.85% <i>versus</i> 2.38%, p=0.0002) as compared to OSAS patients who used less than three strategies. There was no difference in patient demographics, severity of OSAS, driving experience or episodes of nodding at the wheel and reported near miss events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Untreated OSAS patients frequently use certain strategies which could be surrogate markers of sleepiness. Enquiring about such strategies in clinical practice may aid the clinician in identifying the patients who are at risk of driving incidents and to advise appropriately.</p>","PeriodicalId":11739,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10801754/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An exploratory study evaluating the use of coping strategies while driving in obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome patients and controls.\",\"authors\":\"Akshay Dwarakanath, Vinod Palissery, Dipansu Ghosh, Samantha Jamson, Mark Elliott\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/23120541.00638-2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sleepiness while driving is potentially fatal, and it is recommended that a driver who starts to feel tired should stop and have a rest. However, some may use various countermeasures to try to stay alert. We devised a questionnaire that assessed various potential coping strategies that might be used against fatigue and compared them between obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) patients and controls and with sleepiness in general (Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)), specifically while driving (Driving Sleepiness Scale (DSS)) and driving incidents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>119 untreated OSAS patients (male 82%, body mass index (BMI) 37±8 kg·m<sup>-2</sup>, ESS 14±5, DSS 3±2, oxygen desaturation index (ODI) 39±15) and 105 controls (male 70%, BMI 28±6 kg·m<sup>-2</sup>, ESS 4±3, DSS 7±6) matched for age and driving experience were recruited. All completed a questionnaire relating to their experience over the last year, which included sleepiness in general, sleepiness specifically while driving, 10 questions about various coping strategies they might adopt in order to avoid sleepiness and their history of incidents while driving.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As compared to controls, nearly a third of OSAS patients (29.4%) used more than three coping strategies \\\"frequently\\\". OSAS patients who used more than three such strategies had worse ESS (17±4 <i>versus</i> 12±5, p<0.0001); were more likely to feel sleepy while driving (10±8 <i>versus</i> 5±7, p=0.0002) and had more reported accidents (22.85% <i>versus</i> 2.38%, p=0.0002) as compared to OSAS patients who used less than three strategies. There was no difference in patient demographics, severity of OSAS, driving experience or episodes of nodding at the wheel and reported near miss events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Untreated OSAS patients frequently use certain strategies which could be surrogate markers of sleepiness. Enquiring about such strategies in clinical practice may aid the clinician in identifying the patients who are at risk of driving incidents and to advise appropriately.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERJ Open Research\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10801754/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERJ Open Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00638-2023\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00638-2023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:驾驶时犯困有可能致命,建议开始感到疲劳的驾驶员应停车休息。然而,有些人可能会采取各种应对措施,试图保持警觉。我们设计了一份调查问卷,用于评估各种可能用于应对疲劳的策略,并对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合症(OSAS)患者和对照组的这些策略进行了比较,同时还对嗜睡的总体情况(埃普沃斯嗜睡量表(ESS))、驾驶时的嗜睡情况(驾驶嗜睡量表(DSS))和驾驶事故进行了比较。方法:招募 119 名未经治疗的 OSAS 患者(男性 82%,体重指数 (BMI):37±8 kg-m-2,ESS:14±5,DSS:3±2,氧饱和度指数 (ODI):39±15)和 105 名年龄和驾驶经验相匹配的对照组(男性 70%,体重指数 (BMI):28±6 kg-m-2,ESS:4±3,DSS:7±6)。所有人都填写了一份有关其过去一年经历的调查问卷,其中包括总体嗜睡情况、驾驶时的具体嗜睡情况、10个有关为避免嗜睡而可能采取的各种应对策略的问题以及驾驶时的事故史:与对照组相比,近三分之一的 OSAS 患者(29.4%)"经常 "使用三种以上的应对策略。与使用少于三种应对策略的 OSAS 患者相比,使用三种以上应对策略的 OSAS 患者的 ESS 更差(17±4 对 12±5,5±7 对 5±7,P=0.0002),报告的事故更多(22.85% 对 2.38%,P=0.0002)。患者的人口统计学特征、OSAS严重程度、驾驶经验或在方向盘上打盹的情况以及报告的险情没有差异:未经治疗的 OSAS 患者经常使用某些策略,这些策略可能是嗜睡的替代标记。在临床实践中询问这些策略可能有助于临床医生识别有驾驶事故风险的患者,并提供适当的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An exploratory study evaluating the use of coping strategies while driving in obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome patients and controls.

Introduction: Sleepiness while driving is potentially fatal, and it is recommended that a driver who starts to feel tired should stop and have a rest. However, some may use various countermeasures to try to stay alert. We devised a questionnaire that assessed various potential coping strategies that might be used against fatigue and compared them between obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) patients and controls and with sleepiness in general (Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)), specifically while driving (Driving Sleepiness Scale (DSS)) and driving incidents.

Methods: 119 untreated OSAS patients (male 82%, body mass index (BMI) 37±8 kg·m-2, ESS 14±5, DSS 3±2, oxygen desaturation index (ODI) 39±15) and 105 controls (male 70%, BMI 28±6 kg·m-2, ESS 4±3, DSS 7±6) matched for age and driving experience were recruited. All completed a questionnaire relating to their experience over the last year, which included sleepiness in general, sleepiness specifically while driving, 10 questions about various coping strategies they might adopt in order to avoid sleepiness and their history of incidents while driving.

Results: As compared to controls, nearly a third of OSAS patients (29.4%) used more than three coping strategies "frequently". OSAS patients who used more than three such strategies had worse ESS (17±4 versus 12±5, p<0.0001); were more likely to feel sleepy while driving (10±8 versus 5±7, p=0.0002) and had more reported accidents (22.85% versus 2.38%, p=0.0002) as compared to OSAS patients who used less than three strategies. There was no difference in patient demographics, severity of OSAS, driving experience or episodes of nodding at the wheel and reported near miss events.

Conclusions: Untreated OSAS patients frequently use certain strategies which could be surrogate markers of sleepiness. Enquiring about such strategies in clinical practice may aid the clinician in identifying the patients who are at risk of driving incidents and to advise appropriately.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ERJ Open Research
ERJ Open Research Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
273
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: ERJ Open Research is a fully open access original research journal, published online by the European Respiratory Society. The journal aims to publish high-quality work in all fields of respiratory science and medicine, covering basic science, clinical translational science and clinical medicine. The journal was created to help fulfil the ERS objective to disseminate scientific and educational material to its members and to the medical community, but also to provide researchers with an affordable open access specialty journal in which to publish their work.
期刊最新文献
Vascular involvement in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Wearable technology for detection of COPD exacerbations: feasibility of the Health Patch. Anti-interleukin-5/anti-interleukin-5 receptor α treatment improves self-reported work productivity in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma: a prospective cohort trial. Efficacy of tezepelumab in patients with severe asthma and persistent airflow obstruction. Erratum: "Global mortality and readmission rates following COPD exacerbation-related hospitalisation: a meta-analysis of 65 945 individual patients". Kiki Waeijen-Smit, Mieke Crutsen, Spencer Keene, Marc Miravitlles, Ernesto Crisafulli, Antoni Torres, Christian Mueller, Philipp Schuetz, Thomas J. Ringbæk, Fabio Fabbian, Evgeni Mekov, Timothy H. Harries, Chung-tat Lun, Begum Ergan, Cristóbal Esteban, Jose M. Quintana Lopez, José Luis López-Campos, Catherina L. Chang, Robert J. Hancox, Eskandarain Shafuddin, Hollie Ellis, Christer Janson, Charlotte Suppli Ulrik, Gunnar Gudmundsson, Danny Epstein, José Dominguez, Alicia Lacoma, Christian Osadnik, Inmaculada Alia, Francesco Spannella, Zuhal Karakurt, Hossein Mehravaran, Cecile Utens, Martijn D. de Kruif, Fanny Wai San Ko, Samuel P. Trethewey, Alice M. Turner, Dragos Bumbacea, Patrick B. Murphy, Kristina Vermeersch, Shani Zilberman-Itskovich, John Steer, Carlos Echevarria, Stephen C. Bourke, Nicholas Lane, Jordi de Batlle, Roy T.M. Sprooten, Richard Russell, Paola Faverio, Jane L. Cross, Hendrik J. Prins, Martijn A. Spruit, Sami O. Simons, Sarah Houben-Wilke and Frits M.E. Franssen. ERJ Open Res 2024; 10: 00838-2023.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1