经椎间孔内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术和椎板切除术的单中心经验:突破适应症,避免失败。200 例病例报告。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurosurgical sciences Pub Date : 2024-01-23 DOI:10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06105-2
Alessandro Grieco, Letizia Dell'aglio, Jacopo Del Verme, Domenico Billeci, Roberto Zanata, Giuseppe Canova, Enrico Giordan
{"title":"经椎间孔内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术和椎板切除术的单中心经验:突破适应症,避免失败。200 例病例报告。","authors":"Alessandro Grieco, Letizia Dell'aglio, Jacopo Del Verme, Domenico Billeci, Roberto Zanata, Giuseppe Canova, Enrico Giordan","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06105-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This paper reports the results of the treatment of our first 200 cases of lumbar disc herniation and foraminal stenosis using full-endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy (FETLD). We analyzed outcomes and radiological parameters to overcome failure and inappropriate indications and also highlighted the red flags for surgeons coming to this field as well as the pathways to success.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on endoscopic procedures were retrospectively analyzed between October 2018 and March 2023. We abstracted sex, age, leg pain by NPRS, postoperative satisfaction according to the MacNaab score, postoperative surgical complications/adverse events (≤30 days), and history of any previous surgery. Furthermore, we measured different radiological parameters to determine the grade of stenosis or discopathy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Once the learning curve was completed, patients' satisfaction increased to 94%, with only a small percentage (6%) of patients unsatisfied 30 days after the operation. Perioperatively, 33.5% of the patients experienced mild to moderate transitory paresthesia. Univariate analysis showed a tendency toward a higher risk of failure in those patients with degenerative listhesis (odds ratio [OR] 4.8, 95% CI 0.97-23.9, P=0.055) as well as those with severely degenerated discs (OR 8.7, 95% CI 0.96-79.4, P=0.054). Conversely, the chances of failure seemed to be lower in patients with severe foraminal stenosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FETLD proved its efficacy in treating several degenerative spine conditions or was useful for avoiding previous scarring in patients already operated on to the same extent. Therefore, FETLD can be safely used in patients with comorbidities, the elderly, and when the invasiveness of an open technique is not suitable.</p>","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monocentric experience of transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy and foraminotomy outcomes: pushing the indications and avoiding failure. Report of 200 cases.\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Grieco, Letizia Dell'aglio, Jacopo Del Verme, Domenico Billeci, Roberto Zanata, Giuseppe Canova, Enrico Giordan\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06105-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This paper reports the results of the treatment of our first 200 cases of lumbar disc herniation and foraminal stenosis using full-endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy (FETLD). We analyzed outcomes and radiological parameters to overcome failure and inappropriate indications and also highlighted the red flags for surgeons coming to this field as well as the pathways to success.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on endoscopic procedures were retrospectively analyzed between October 2018 and March 2023. We abstracted sex, age, leg pain by NPRS, postoperative satisfaction according to the MacNaab score, postoperative surgical complications/adverse events (≤30 days), and history of any previous surgery. Furthermore, we measured different radiological parameters to determine the grade of stenosis or discopathy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Once the learning curve was completed, patients' satisfaction increased to 94%, with only a small percentage (6%) of patients unsatisfied 30 days after the operation. Perioperatively, 33.5% of the patients experienced mild to moderate transitory paresthesia. Univariate analysis showed a tendency toward a higher risk of failure in those patients with degenerative listhesis (odds ratio [OR] 4.8, 95% CI 0.97-23.9, P=0.055) as well as those with severely degenerated discs (OR 8.7, 95% CI 0.96-79.4, P=0.054). Conversely, the chances of failure seemed to be lower in patients with severe foraminal stenosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FETLD proved its efficacy in treating several degenerative spine conditions or was useful for avoiding previous scarring in patients already operated on to the same extent. Therefore, FETLD can be safely used in patients with comorbidities, the elderly, and when the invasiveness of an open technique is not suitable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgical sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06105-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06105-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本文报告了我们使用全内窥镜经椎间孔腰椎间盘切除术(FETLD)治疗首批200例腰椎间盘突出症和椎间孔狭窄症的结果。我们分析了结果和放射学参数,以克服失败和不适当的适应症,还强调了外科医生在进入这一领域时应注意的问题以及成功的途径:我们对2018年10月至2023年3月期间的内窥镜手术数据进行了回顾性分析。我们抽取了性别、年龄、根据 NPRS 进行的腿部疼痛、根据 MacNaab 评分进行的术后满意度、术后手术并发症/不良事件(≤30 天)以及既往手术史。此外,我们还测量了不同的放射学参数,以确定狭窄或椎间盘病变的等级:结果:学习曲线结束后,患者的满意度上升到94%,只有一小部分患者(6%)在术后30天仍不满意。围手术期,33.5%的患者出现轻度至中度短暂性麻痹。单变量分析显示,患有退行性椎间盘突出的患者(几率比 [OR] 4.8,95% CI 0.97-23.9,P=0.055)和患有严重退行性椎间盘突出的患者(OR 8.7,95% CI 0.96-79.4,P=0.054)的手术失败风险较高。相反,严重椎孔狭窄患者的失败几率似乎较低:FETLD在治疗多种脊柱退行性病变方面证明了其疗效,或有助于避免已接受过相同程度手术的患者再次留下疤痕。因此,FETLD可安全地用于有合并症的患者、老年人以及不适合采用开放技术的创伤性患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Monocentric experience of transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy and foraminotomy outcomes: pushing the indications and avoiding failure. Report of 200 cases.

Background: This paper reports the results of the treatment of our first 200 cases of lumbar disc herniation and foraminal stenosis using full-endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy (FETLD). We analyzed outcomes and radiological parameters to overcome failure and inappropriate indications and also highlighted the red flags for surgeons coming to this field as well as the pathways to success.

Methods: Data on endoscopic procedures were retrospectively analyzed between October 2018 and March 2023. We abstracted sex, age, leg pain by NPRS, postoperative satisfaction according to the MacNaab score, postoperative surgical complications/adverse events (≤30 days), and history of any previous surgery. Furthermore, we measured different radiological parameters to determine the grade of stenosis or discopathy.

Results: Once the learning curve was completed, patients' satisfaction increased to 94%, with only a small percentage (6%) of patients unsatisfied 30 days after the operation. Perioperatively, 33.5% of the patients experienced mild to moderate transitory paresthesia. Univariate analysis showed a tendency toward a higher risk of failure in those patients with degenerative listhesis (odds ratio [OR] 4.8, 95% CI 0.97-23.9, P=0.055) as well as those with severely degenerated discs (OR 8.7, 95% CI 0.96-79.4, P=0.054). Conversely, the chances of failure seemed to be lower in patients with severe foraminal stenosis.

Conclusions: FETLD proved its efficacy in treating several degenerative spine conditions or was useful for avoiding previous scarring in patients already operated on to the same extent. Therefore, FETLD can be safely used in patients with comorbidities, the elderly, and when the invasiveness of an open technique is not suitable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgical sciences
Journal of neurosurgical sciences CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences publishes scientific papers on neurosurgery and related subjects (electroencephalography, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropathology, stereotaxy, neuroanatomy, neuroradiology, etc.). Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of ditorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of intra-operative skull fixation techniques on cervical sagittal parameters. Normal pressure hydrocephalus treatment: is it time to rethink? Roxadustat protects oxidative stress and tissue injury in the brain induced by ischemic stroke via the HIF-1α/NRF2 axis. Follow-up neuroimaging after non-perimesencephalic, angiogram-negative subarachnoid hemorrhage. Tuberculum sellae meningiomas: surgical outcomes in 65 patients, review of the literature and proposal for an anatomical and radiological classification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1