Marie Bayot, Anke Boone, Lode Godderis, Anne-Laure Lenoir
{"title":"全科医生职业倦怠的多维因素:横断面调查。","authors":"Marie Bayot, Anke Boone, Lode Godderis, Anne-Laure Lenoir","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>GPs are particularly vulnerable to job burnout. Tailored prevention and intervention strategies are needed.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate organisational, interpersonal, and individual factors contributing to exhaustion and disengagement at work among GPs.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study in a sample of Belgian GPs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 358 doctors (73% females, 301 with complete data) completed an online anonymous questionnaire assessing job burnout, psychosocial characteristics of the work environment, perceived social support in the private domain, emotional competence, and self-compassion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GPs reported moderate levels of exhaustion and disengagement. Regression models showed that included factors jointly explained 69% of the variance in exhaustion and 63% in disengagement. Exhaustion was significantly predicted by female sex (<i>β</i> effect size = -0.1), high perceived emotional demands (<i>β</i> = 0.19), as well as low self-compassion (<i>β</i> = -0.14) and low emotional competence (<i>β</i> = 0.09). Disengagement was significantly predicted by low seniority (<i>β</i> = -0.12) and limited opportunities for development (<i>β</i> = -0.16). Both exhaustion and disengagement were predicted by low perceived quality of work (<i>β</i> = -0.19 and -0.14, respectively), meaning of work (<i>β</i> = -0.17 and -0.31, respectively), and role clarity (<i>β</i> = 0.09 and 0.12, respectively), as well as high perceived work-life conflict (<i>β</i> = 0.46 and 0.21, respectively). Moreover, GPs working in a multidisciplinary group reported lower levels of exhaustion and disengagement than those working in a monodisciplinary group or a solo practice, and this difference was associated with factors such as work-life conflict.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Organisational, interpersonal, and intrapersonal factors interact to predict a substantial part of burnout in general practice. The most significant risk factors were perceived work-life conflict and poor meaning of work. Policymakers should work to support more sustainable practices based on the specific needs and constraints reported by GPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300977/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multidimensional factors of burnout in general practice: a cross sectional survey.\",\"authors\":\"Marie Bayot, Anke Boone, Lode Godderis, Anne-Laure Lenoir\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>GPs are particularly vulnerable to job burnout. Tailored prevention and intervention strategies are needed.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate organisational, interpersonal, and individual factors contributing to exhaustion and disengagement at work among GPs.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study in a sample of Belgian GPs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 358 doctors (73% females, 301 with complete data) completed an online anonymous questionnaire assessing job burnout, psychosocial characteristics of the work environment, perceived social support in the private domain, emotional competence, and self-compassion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GPs reported moderate levels of exhaustion and disengagement. Regression models showed that included factors jointly explained 69% of the variance in exhaustion and 63% in disengagement. Exhaustion was significantly predicted by female sex (<i>β</i> effect size = -0.1), high perceived emotional demands (<i>β</i> = 0.19), as well as low self-compassion (<i>β</i> = -0.14) and low emotional competence (<i>β</i> = 0.09). Disengagement was significantly predicted by low seniority (<i>β</i> = -0.12) and limited opportunities for development (<i>β</i> = -0.16). Both exhaustion and disengagement were predicted by low perceived quality of work (<i>β</i> = -0.19 and -0.14, respectively), meaning of work (<i>β</i> = -0.17 and -0.31, respectively), and role clarity (<i>β</i> = 0.09 and 0.12, respectively), as well as high perceived work-life conflict (<i>β</i> = 0.46 and 0.21, respectively). Moreover, GPs working in a multidisciplinary group reported lower levels of exhaustion and disengagement than those working in a monodisciplinary group or a solo practice, and this difference was associated with factors such as work-life conflict.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Organisational, interpersonal, and intrapersonal factors interact to predict a substantial part of burnout in general practice. The most significant risk factors were perceived work-life conflict and poor meaning of work. Policymakers should work to support more sustainable practices based on the specific needs and constraints reported by GPs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJGP Open\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300977/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJGP Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multidimensional factors of burnout in general practice: a cross sectional survey.
Background: GPs are particularly vulnerable to job burnout. Tailored prevention and intervention strategies are needed.
Aim: To investigate organisational, interpersonal, and individual factors contributing to exhaustion and disengagement at work among GPs.
Design & setting: We conducted a cross-sectional study in a sample of Belgian GPs.
Method: A total of 358 doctors (73% females, 301 with complete data) completed an online anonymous questionnaire assessing job burnout, psychosocial characteristics of the work environment, perceived social support in the private domain, emotional competence, and self-compassion.
Results: GPs reported moderate levels of exhaustion and disengagement. Regression models showed that included factors jointly explained 69% of the variance in exhaustion and 63% in disengagement. Exhaustion was significantly predicted by female sex (β effect size = -0.1), high perceived emotional demands (β = 0.19), as well as low self-compassion (β = -0.14) and low emotional competence (β = 0.09). Disengagement was significantly predicted by low seniority (β = -0.12) and limited opportunities for development (β = -0.16). Both exhaustion and disengagement were predicted by low perceived quality of work (β = -0.19 and -0.14, respectively), meaning of work (β = -0.17 and -0.31, respectively), and role clarity (β = 0.09 and 0.12, respectively), as well as high perceived work-life conflict (β = 0.46 and 0.21, respectively). Moreover, GPs working in a multidisciplinary group reported lower levels of exhaustion and disengagement than those working in a monodisciplinary group or a solo practice, and this difference was associated with factors such as work-life conflict.
Conclusion: Organisational, interpersonal, and intrapersonal factors interact to predict a substantial part of burnout in general practice. The most significant risk factors were perceived work-life conflict and poor meaning of work. Policymakers should work to support more sustainable practices based on the specific needs and constraints reported by GPs.