与电子病历的更多联系:2019-2023 年学术初级保健医生的电子病历工作量趋势》(More Tethered to EHR: EHR Workload Trends Among Academic Primary Care Physicians, 2019-2023)。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Annals of Family Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1370/afm.3047
Brian G Arndt, Mark A Micek, Adam Rule, Christina M Shafer, Jeffrey J Baltus, Christine A Sinsky
{"title":"与电子病历的更多联系:2019-2023 年学术初级保健医生的电子病历工作量趋势》(More Tethered to EHR: EHR Workload Trends Among Academic Primary Care Physicians, 2019-2023)。","authors":"Brian G Arndt, Mark A Micek, Adam Rule, Christina M Shafer, Jeffrey J Baltus, Christine A Sinsky","doi":"10.1370/afm.3047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to evaluate recent trends in primary care physician (PCP) electronic health record (EHR) workload.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This longitudinal study observed the EHR use of 141 academic PCPs over 4 years (May 2019 to March 2023). Ambulatory full-time equivalency (aFTE), visit volume, and panel size were evaluated. Electronic health record time and inbox message volume were measured per 8 hours of scheduled clinic appointments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the pre-COVID-19 pandemic year (May 2019 to February 2020) to the most recent study year (April 2022 to March 2023), the average time PCPs spent in the EHR per 8 hours of scheduled clinic appointments increased (+28.4 minutes, 7.8%), as did time in orders (+23.1 minutes, 58.9%), inbox (+14.0 minutes, 24.4%), chart review (+7.2 minutes, 13.0%), notes (+2.9 minutes, 2.3%), outside scheduled hours on days with scheduled appointments (+6.4 minutes, 8.2%), and on unscheduled days (+13.6 minutes, 19.9%). Primary care physicians received more patient medical advice requests (+5.4 messages, 55.5%) and prescription messages (+2.3, 19.5%) per 8 hours of scheduled clinic appointments, but fewer patient calls (-2.8, -10.5%) and results messages (-0.3, -2.7%). While total time in the EHR continued to increase in the final study year (+7.7 minutes, 2.0%), inbox time decreased slightly from the year prior (-2.2 minutes, -3.0%). Primary care physicians' average aFTE decreased 5.2% from 0.66 to 0.63 over 4 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Primary care physicians' time in the EHR continues to grow. While PCPs' inbox time may be stabilizing, it is still substantially higher than pre-pandemic levels. It is imperative health systems develop strategies to change the EHR workload trajectory to minimize PCPs' occupational stress and mitigate unnecessary reductions in effective physician workforce resulting from the increased EHR burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":50973,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Family Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11233089/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More Tethered to the EHR: EHR Workload Trends Among Academic Primary Care Physicians, 2019-2023.\",\"authors\":\"Brian G Arndt, Mark A Micek, Adam Rule, Christina M Shafer, Jeffrey J Baltus, Christine A Sinsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1370/afm.3047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to evaluate recent trends in primary care physician (PCP) electronic health record (EHR) workload.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This longitudinal study observed the EHR use of 141 academic PCPs over 4 years (May 2019 to March 2023). Ambulatory full-time equivalency (aFTE), visit volume, and panel size were evaluated. Electronic health record time and inbox message volume were measured per 8 hours of scheduled clinic appointments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the pre-COVID-19 pandemic year (May 2019 to February 2020) to the most recent study year (April 2022 to March 2023), the average time PCPs spent in the EHR per 8 hours of scheduled clinic appointments increased (+28.4 minutes, 7.8%), as did time in orders (+23.1 minutes, 58.9%), inbox (+14.0 minutes, 24.4%), chart review (+7.2 minutes, 13.0%), notes (+2.9 minutes, 2.3%), outside scheduled hours on days with scheduled appointments (+6.4 minutes, 8.2%), and on unscheduled days (+13.6 minutes, 19.9%). Primary care physicians received more patient medical advice requests (+5.4 messages, 55.5%) and prescription messages (+2.3, 19.5%) per 8 hours of scheduled clinic appointments, but fewer patient calls (-2.8, -10.5%) and results messages (-0.3, -2.7%). While total time in the EHR continued to increase in the final study year (+7.7 minutes, 2.0%), inbox time decreased slightly from the year prior (-2.2 minutes, -3.0%). Primary care physicians' average aFTE decreased 5.2% from 0.66 to 0.63 over 4 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Primary care physicians' time in the EHR continues to grow. While PCPs' inbox time may be stabilizing, it is still substantially higher than pre-pandemic levels. It is imperative health systems develop strategies to change the EHR workload trajectory to minimize PCPs' occupational stress and mitigate unnecessary reductions in effective physician workforce resulting from the increased EHR burden.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Family Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11233089/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3047\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估初级保健医生(PCP)电子健康记录(EHR)工作量的最新趋势:这项纵向研究观察了 141 名学术初级保健医生在 4 年内(2019 年 5 月至 2023 年 3 月)的电子健康记录使用情况。对门诊全职当量(aFTE)、就诊量和小组规模进行了评估。对每 8 小时预约门诊的电子健康记录时间和收件箱信息量进行了测量:结果:从 COVID-19 流行前的一年(2019 年 5 月至 2020 年 2 月)到最近的研究年(2022 年 4 月至 2023 年 3 月),初级保健医生每 8 小时预定门诊预约在电子健康记录中花费的平均时间增加了(+28.4 分钟,7.8%),订单时间也增加了(+23.1 分钟,占 58.9%)、收件箱(+14.0 分钟,占 24.4%)、病历审查(+7.2 分钟,占 13.0%)、笔记(+2.9 分钟,占 2.3%)、计划预约日的计划外时间(+6.4 分钟,占 8.2%)和计划外时间(+13.6 分钟,占 19.9%)。初级保健医生在预约门诊的每 8 小时内收到了更多的患者医疗建议请求(+5.4 条,55.5%)和处方信息(+2.3 条,19.5%),但收到的患者电话(-2.8 条,-10.5%)和结果信息(-0.3 条,-2.7%)较少。在研究的最后一年,电子病历的总使用时间继续增加(+7.7 分钟,2.0%),但收件箱时间比前一年略有减少(-2.2 分钟,-3.0%)。4 年间,全科医生的平均 aFTE 从 0.66 下降到 0.63,降幅为 5.2%:结论:初级保健医生使用电子病历的时间持续增长。虽然初级保健医生的收件箱时间可能趋于稳定,但仍大大高于大流行前的水平。医疗系统必须制定策略来改变电子病历的工作量轨迹,以最大限度地减轻初级保健医生的职业压力,并减少因电子病历负担加重而导致的不必要的有效医生队伍减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
More Tethered to the EHR: EHR Workload Trends Among Academic Primary Care Physicians, 2019-2023.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate recent trends in primary care physician (PCP) electronic health record (EHR) workload.

Methods: This longitudinal study observed the EHR use of 141 academic PCPs over 4 years (May 2019 to March 2023). Ambulatory full-time equivalency (aFTE), visit volume, and panel size were evaluated. Electronic health record time and inbox message volume were measured per 8 hours of scheduled clinic appointments.

Results: From the pre-COVID-19 pandemic year (May 2019 to February 2020) to the most recent study year (April 2022 to March 2023), the average time PCPs spent in the EHR per 8 hours of scheduled clinic appointments increased (+28.4 minutes, 7.8%), as did time in orders (+23.1 minutes, 58.9%), inbox (+14.0 minutes, 24.4%), chart review (+7.2 minutes, 13.0%), notes (+2.9 minutes, 2.3%), outside scheduled hours on days with scheduled appointments (+6.4 minutes, 8.2%), and on unscheduled days (+13.6 minutes, 19.9%). Primary care physicians received more patient medical advice requests (+5.4 messages, 55.5%) and prescription messages (+2.3, 19.5%) per 8 hours of scheduled clinic appointments, but fewer patient calls (-2.8, -10.5%) and results messages (-0.3, -2.7%). While total time in the EHR continued to increase in the final study year (+7.7 minutes, 2.0%), inbox time decreased slightly from the year prior (-2.2 minutes, -3.0%). Primary care physicians' average aFTE decreased 5.2% from 0.66 to 0.63 over 4 years.

Conclusions: Primary care physicians' time in the EHR continues to grow. While PCPs' inbox time may be stabilizing, it is still substantially higher than pre-pandemic levels. It is imperative health systems develop strategies to change the EHR workload trajectory to minimize PCPs' occupational stress and mitigate unnecessary reductions in effective physician workforce resulting from the increased EHR burden.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Family Medicine
Annals of Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Family Medicine is a peer-reviewed research journal to meet the needs of scientists, practitioners, policymakers, and the patients and communities they serve.
期刊最新文献
Prehospital Clinical Decision-Making for Medication Administration for Behavioral Emergencies. Rapid Antigen Testing in School Health Offices for Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A. Assessment and comparison of the ILI case definition in clinical and school-based community settings: ORCHARDS/IISP. Efficacy and Safety of BB-12 Supplemented Strawberry Yogurt For Healthy Children on Antibiotics (PLAY ON). Exploratory Pilot Studies to Demonstrate Mechanisms of Preventing Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea and the Role for Probiotics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1