从 P 波和雷电波极化分析看青藏高原东北部 CHINArray-II 传感器的方位问题

IF 2.6 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Seismological Research Letters Pub Date : 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1785/0220230328
Shanshan Wu, Zhen Guo, Bin Luo, Lei Qin, Chenglong Wu, Zigen Wei, Pengfei Ren, Haiying Yu
{"title":"从 P 波和雷电波极化分析看青藏高原东北部 CHINArray-II 传感器的方位问题","authors":"Shanshan Wu, Zhen Guo, Bin Luo, Lei Qin, Chenglong Wu, Zigen Wei, Pengfei Ren, Haiying Yu","doi":"10.1785/0220230328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Accurate sensor orientation is important in providing reliable data used for seismological analysis such as P-wave receiver function analysis, shear-wave splitting, and ambient noise analysis. In this study, we used three distinct P-wave and Rayleigh-wave polarization analysis methods to estimate actual sensor orientation of 660 stations from CHINArray-II in northeastern margin of Tibetan plateau. We found that ∼42.12%–45.76% of the stations are well oriented with the absolute misorientation angle <3°, 42.42%–45.45% of the stations are fairly oriented with the absolute misorientation angle ranging from 3° to 10°, and 8.94%–11.82% of the stations are oriented with the absolute misorientation angle >10°. We further compared the results of some seismological analyses before and after sensor misorientation correction, such as Rayleigh-wave ellipticity (horizontal-to-vertical ratio) and P-wave receiver functions analysis. We found that when the sensor misorientation angle is large, it may lead to incorrect seismological results. With the same sensor misorientation, its influence on different seismological analysis is also different.","PeriodicalId":21687,"journal":{"name":"Seismological Research Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensor Misorientation of CHINArray-II in Northeastern Tibetan Plateau from P- and Rayleigh-Wave Polarization Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Shanshan Wu, Zhen Guo, Bin Luo, Lei Qin, Chenglong Wu, Zigen Wei, Pengfei Ren, Haiying Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1785/0220230328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Accurate sensor orientation is important in providing reliable data used for seismological analysis such as P-wave receiver function analysis, shear-wave splitting, and ambient noise analysis. In this study, we used three distinct P-wave and Rayleigh-wave polarization analysis methods to estimate actual sensor orientation of 660 stations from CHINArray-II in northeastern margin of Tibetan plateau. We found that ∼42.12%–45.76% of the stations are well oriented with the absolute misorientation angle <3°, 42.42%–45.45% of the stations are fairly oriented with the absolute misorientation angle ranging from 3° to 10°, and 8.94%–11.82% of the stations are oriented with the absolute misorientation angle >10°. We further compared the results of some seismological analyses before and after sensor misorientation correction, such as Rayleigh-wave ellipticity (horizontal-to-vertical ratio) and P-wave receiver functions analysis. We found that when the sensor misorientation angle is large, it may lead to incorrect seismological results. With the same sensor misorientation, its influence on different seismological analysis is also different.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seismological Research Letters\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seismological Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1785/0220230328\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seismological Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1785/0220230328","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确的传感器方位对于提供用于地震学分析(如 P 波接收函数分析、剪切波分裂和环境噪声分析)的可靠数据非常重要。在本研究中,我们使用了三种不同的 P 波和雷利波极化分析方法来估算位于青藏高原东北边缘的 CHINArray-II 中 660 个台站的实际传感器方位。我们发现,42.12%~45.76%的台站方位良好,绝对偏差角为 10°。我们进一步比较了一些地震学分析结果,如雷波椭圆度(水平-垂直比)和 P 波接收函数分析等。我们发现,当传感器错向角较大时,可能会导致地震学结果错误。同样的传感器偏角,对不同地震学分析的影响也是不同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sensor Misorientation of CHINArray-II in Northeastern Tibetan Plateau from P- and Rayleigh-Wave Polarization Analysis
Accurate sensor orientation is important in providing reliable data used for seismological analysis such as P-wave receiver function analysis, shear-wave splitting, and ambient noise analysis. In this study, we used three distinct P-wave and Rayleigh-wave polarization analysis methods to estimate actual sensor orientation of 660 stations from CHINArray-II in northeastern margin of Tibetan plateau. We found that ∼42.12%–45.76% of the stations are well oriented with the absolute misorientation angle <3°, 42.42%–45.45% of the stations are fairly oriented with the absolute misorientation angle ranging from 3° to 10°, and 8.94%–11.82% of the stations are oriented with the absolute misorientation angle >10°. We further compared the results of some seismological analyses before and after sensor misorientation correction, such as Rayleigh-wave ellipticity (horizontal-to-vertical ratio) and P-wave receiver functions analysis. We found that when the sensor misorientation angle is large, it may lead to incorrect seismological results. With the same sensor misorientation, its influence on different seismological analysis is also different.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seismological Research Letters
Seismological Research Letters 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
12.10%
发文量
239
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Follow the Trace: Becoming a Seismo‐Detective with a Campus‐Based Raspberry Shake Seismometer Nominations for the Next Joyner Lecturer Due 30 June Imaging Urban Hidden Faults with Ambient Noise Recorded by Dense Seismic Arrays Microseismic Event Location with Dual Vertical DAS Arrays: Insights from the FORGE 2022 Stimulation New Empirical Source‐Scaling Laws for Crustal Earthquakes Incorporating Fault Dip and Seismogenic‐Thickness Effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1